The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
887件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、Hogatexのユーザーはを最も評価し、Mewsのユーザーはease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibilityを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
| Hogatex |
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
オンボーディングとサポート
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
レポート作成と分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #3 329件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #1 397件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #3 45件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #3 49件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #1 483件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #5 220件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #2 170件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #1 130件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | — | #8 106件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #1 660件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | — | #10 17件のレビュー |
| 中東 ▾ | — | #28 8件のレビュー |
Choosing between Hogatex PMS by Hogatex and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel's specific needs, operational scale, and growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline property management, but Hogatex offers a nearly nonexistent online presence and zero reviews, indicating it might not be a viable option for modern hoteliers. Mews, on the other hand, has over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with an impressive 4.62 out of 5 rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend—making it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven, current technology.
If your priority is a system backed by active user feedback and ongoing innovation, Mews clearly leads. Hogatex’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s either nascent or inactive, raising doubts about its support and future development. Are you comfortable navigating an untested system, or do you prefer a platform with extensive community validation?
Hogatex presents as a property management solution, but with no available reviews or recent activity, it's difficult to gauge its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Mews, by contrast, boasts 758 reviews, with 98 in the last six months, emphasizing its active development and customer engagement—factors critical for today’s hotel operators. The stark difference suggests Mews is the safer, more tested option, especially for hotels seeking modern, scalable management.
Hogatex’s absence of a review base means you lack insight into real-world performance, support quality, or feature reliability. Meanwhile, Mews’s high review count and recent feedback highlight a well-established platform trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide. Which would you rather rely on for your hotel’s future?
Mews scores 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, with a notable 4.27 for customer support, reflecting a user-friendly interface and reliable onboarding. Hogatex, with a rating of zero, offers no data to support its ease of use or staff adoption—raising questions about implementation clarity.
Most Mews users praise the platform’s intuitive design, quick setup, and minimal training requirements, citing the onboarding process as smooth and staff adoption high. Hogatex’s lack of review data suggests it may lack the user-focused design needed for efficient adoption. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive suite with 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online booking engine, integrated channel manager, mobile apps, and advanced reporting—features crucial for modern hotel management. Hogatex provides none of these, indicating a likely limited or non-existent feature set.
The depth and breadth of Mews’s features enable it to serve diverse hotel types, from boutique to large chains, with capabilities that support revenue growth and operational control. Hogatex’s minimal feature offering suggests it’s either very early-stage or not designed for comprehensive hotel management. The clear edge goes to Mews.
Mews scores 4.27 out of 5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and proactive onboarding. Hogatex has no reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its support quality, responsiveness, or user satisfaction.
In the hospitality industry, reliable support is vital for smooth operations and quick resolution of issues. Mews’s active support team and positive reviews demonstrate its commitment, whereas Hogatex’s silence indicates a potential risk. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with 336 verified partners, including industry-leading channel managers, payment providers, and revenue tools, offering a flexible, connected tech ecosystem. Hogatex, with zero verified partnerships, likely has limited or no integrations, restricting its utility in a multi-channel environment.
The extensive integrations of Mews allow hotels to customize their tech stack, automate workflows, and optimize revenue. Hogatex’s lack of integrations suggests it’s not built for the interconnected, modern hospitality landscape. Edge: Mews.
With over 750 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, Mews is clearly favored by hoteliers across various segments, from boutique hotels to large chains. Hogatex, with no reviews or ratings, cannot be rated, indicating no proven user satisfaction.
Hotels that have adopted Mews often praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, boosting confidence in its reliability and scalability. Hogatex’s lack of feedback means hoteliers must rely on assumptions rather than proven performance. Edge: Mews.
Hogatex pricing is unavailable, which raises concerns about transparency and potential costs. Mews charges a $900 monthly fee, with no implementation or hidden fees, providing clarity upfront.
While Mews’s cost may seem significant, its comprehensive features and active support justify the investment, especially considering the ROI and efficiency gains reported. Hogatex’s price is unknown, making it difficult to evaluate value. Edge: Mews.
Given Hogatex’s limited feature set and no active reviews, it’s best suited for properties with minimal management complexity or those willing to develop their own solution.
Mews excels across multiple segments, from luxury to budget, and is suited for properties aiming to modernize and grow.
Mews is a well-established, feature-rich platform trusted by thousands of hotels globally, with active development and support evidenced by recent reviews. Hogatex, with no reviews or recent activity, is unlikely to meet the needs of modern hoteliers or support growth.
If your hotel values a proven, highly-rated system that integrates seamlessly and offers ongoing innovation, Mews is the clear choice. Hogatex’s limited data and feature set suggest it’s not suitable for hotels looking to scale or improve operational efficiency.
Choose Mews if you want a reliable, customizable platform with proven support and community trust. Opt for Hogatex only if your hotel has very specific, minimal needs and you’re prepared to manage its limitations without the backing of a vibrant user base or active development.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収... Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収益分析において、より詳細なデータ分析を求める声がユーザーから上がっている。
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。Hogatex PMSとMews PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Hogatex PMSは0件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Mews PMSは336件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Mews PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Hogatex PMS:いいえ。Mews PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。HogatexのHT Scoreは0、Mewsは99です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー