The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
549件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、Hotelloのユーザーはを最も評価し、HOTELTIMEのユーザーはuser interface and learning curve, テクニカルサポート, reporting and analyticsを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
テクニカルサポート
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
モバイル最適化
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #5 219件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #3 238件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #2 46件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #8 7件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #5 239件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #3 241件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #4 143件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #4 49件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | — | #52 4件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #2 384件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | — | #5 111件のレビュー |
| 中東 ▾ | — | #1 21件のレビュー |
Choosing between Hotello PMS by Hotello and HotelTime PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ substantially in features, market presence, and user feedback. Hotello, acquired by Mews, is a less-established product with no recent reviews and no publicly available ratings, which makes it difficult to gauge its current performance. HotelTime, on the other hand, boasts over 430 reviews, a high overall rating of 4.83/5, and recent positive feedback from a global client base.
The core challenge lies in evaluating whether to trust a newer, less-reviewed solution or opt for a proven, feature-rich platform with widespread adoption and recent satisfied users. Which system aligns better with your operational goals and guest experience priorities?
Hotello PMS positions itself as a cloud-based product with a focus on design elegance and reliability, claiming to simplify hotel management and improve guest interaction. However, with no recent reviews or ratings available, its actual performance and customer satisfaction are unverified. HotelTime, meanwhile, is a mature platform with over 430 reviews, a 4.83/5 score, and a recent NPS score of 9.26/10, demonstrating strong user confidence and ongoing customer advocacy.
Hotello claims to be adaptable and human-centric, but it lacks publicly available evidence of recent user experiences or case studies. HotelTime’s latest reviews highlight its ease of access, automation features, and continuous updates, making it a safer choice for hoteliers seeking dependable performance. Are you comfortable betting on a product with no recent customer feedback, or do you prefer a platform with proven satisfaction and ongoing support?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based PMS with a focus on reliability and a clean interface, Hotello might appeal—though its lack of recent reviews makes this a gamble. Conversely, HotelTime suits properties seeking a comprehensive, feature-rich solution that supports large operations and offers extensive integrations, proven by its robust review base and high ratings.
For small to medium hotels prioritizing ease of use, HotelTime’s current customer satisfaction makes it the clear choice. Larger resorts or chains that need advanced automation, reporting, and multi-property management will benefit more from HotelTime’s proven capabilities. Which system offers the track record and features needed for your property’s scale and complexity?
HotelTime’s user interface scores a 4.66/5 and is praised for its intuitiveness by recent reviews, with users highlighting simplified reservation management and real-time reporting. Hotello’s interface, lacking recent ratings and reviews, remains unverified but emphasizes design elegance and developer focus on human-centered workflows.
HotelTime’s onboarding process is rated 4.63/5, with reviews emphasizing quick setup and ongoing support, whereas Hotello offers no recent user feedback to assess ease of use. Edge: HotelTime. If operational simplicity and proven user satisfaction are what matter most, HotelTime’s recent reviews clearly favor it.
HotelTime offers 51 features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, online check-in, automated night audits, and more than 10 modules designed for operational efficiency. Hotello, by comparison, claims to be a reliable cloud solution but provides no publicly available list of features or recent updates, making it difficult to assess its scope.
HotelTime’s extensive feature set is demonstrated by its broad partner integrations and proven automation tools. Hotello’s claims of adaptability and simplicity are uncorroborated by recent data. Edge: HotelTime. For a feature-rich, well-supported platform, HotelTime clearly leads.
Recent reviews of HotelTime consistently praise its support team for responsiveness and helpfulness, with a 4.73/5 customer support rating and comments like, “The support staff is always on the other end of the phone.” Hotello’s customer support rating and reviews are unavailable, placing it at a disadvantage in this critical area.
HotelTime’s onboarding and support are frequently cited as key strengths, essential for smooth implementation and ongoing success. Edge: HotelTime. If reliable support is a priority—especially for remote or complex operations—HotelTime’s recent positive feedback makes it the smarter choice.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified partners, including key integrations with STR, TrustYou, Amadeus, and a host of third-party systems like Profitroom and Bookboost. Hotello has only 16 verified integrations, with some notable partners like Sage, Innspire, and Rate Yield.
Given the importance of seamless connectivity in modern hotel operations, HotelTime’s broader and more current integration ecosystem makes it the superior choice. Edge: HotelTime. If your hotel relies on extensive third-party systems, HotelTime’s ecosystem will serve you better.
HotelTime’s latest reviews indicate a 4.83/5 overall rating from 433 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, automation, and support. In contrast, Hotello has no recent reviews or ratings to reflect current user sentiment, making it impossible to gauge satisfaction.
HotelTime’s high volume of recent reviews confirms ongoing customer confidence across various hotel types, from boutique to resorts. Edge: HotelTime. For proven, high-rated satisfaction, HotelTime is the clear leader.
Hotello’s pricing details are unavailable, with no indication of trial, subscription model, or setup fees. HotelTime charges a base price of $600, with no free tier or trial, but its transparent pricing and extensive feature set justify the value.
Without concrete data, Hotello’s costs remain uncertain, which complicates budget planning. HotelTime’s clear pricing structure offers better upfront transparency. Edge: HotelTime for clarity and value.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Hotello PMS offers a promising concept: a cloud-based platform tailored to reliability and guest management. However, with no recent reviews or customer satisfaction data, its true performance remains unverified—making it a risky choice for hotels that value proven results.
HotelTime excels in delivering a feature-rich, well-supported platform with thousands of satisfied users and recent positive reviews. Its extensive integrations, automation, and support make it ideal for hotels seeking a reliable, scalable PMS that improves operational efficiency.
If your hotel needs a well-established, comprehensive system with a track record of customer satisfaction, HotelTime is the clear choice. Hotello may appeal to properties willing to take a chance on a less-tested product, but for assured performance, HotelTime remains the safer bet.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時... サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時サポートが提供され、ユーザー エクスペリエンスがさらに向上すると指摘されています。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews)とHotelTime PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews)は16件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、HotelTime PMSは58件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。HotelTime PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews):いいえ。HotelTime PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。HotelloのHT Scoreは0、HOTELTIMEは91です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー