The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
887件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、Jarasのユーザーはを最も評価し、Mewsのユーザーはease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibilityを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
オンボーディングとサポート
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
レポート作成と分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #3 329件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #1 397件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #3 45件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #3 49件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #1 483件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #5 220件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #2 170件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #1 130件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | — | #8 106件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #1 660件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | — | #10 17件のレビュー |
| 中東 ▾ | — | #28 8件のレビュー |
Choosing between Jaras by Jaras and Mews PMS depends heavily on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scope. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in features, scalability, and user experience. Where Jaras offers a centralized, reservation-focused platform, Mews emphasizes automation, integrations, and a broader ecosystem. Do you prioritize comprehensive automation or a unified reservation hub?
Jaras excels in unit management, financial workflows, and its on-premise option, but it has zero reviews in recent months, suggesting limited data on current performance. Conversely, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with recent feedback confirming a high satisfaction rate. Would you trust a product with more momentum and proven user confidence?
Jaras is a cloud-native platform designed to manage reservations, automation, and financial workflows across hotels, resorts, and serviced apartments. It consolidates core operations into a single dashboard but lacks the extensive third-party integrations and advanced features found in Mews.
Mews is a highly adaptable, cloud-based PMS supporting diverse hotel types, with over 336 verified integrations and advanced modules like guest CRM, online check-in, and automated night audits. Its recent reviews praise ease of use, automation, and global reach, making it a strong choice for hotels aiming for digital transformation.
Do you need a straightforward reservation system, or do you want a comprehensive, scalable platform capable of integrating with your entire tech stack?
If your hotel needs a flexible solution with extensive integrations, automation, and proven scalability, go with Mews. Its large user base, recent reviews, and industry accolades show it’s well-positioned for both independent and large property portfolios.
If you require a reservation-centric system with on-premise options and simpler workflows, Jaras might fit, especially if your operations are focused on unit management without complex integrations. However, keep in mind the limited recent user feedback on Jaras, which raises questions about ongoing support and feature updates.
For hotels prioritizing rapid growth, guest experience, and operational efficiency, Mews is the safer, more future-proof choice.
Mews receives a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on over 98 recent reviews, with users describing its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Support for staff adoption is emphasized, with many users citing quick setup times and minimal training.
Jaras, on the other hand, has no recent reviews, so its ease of use is less validated. Its on-premise feature might suggest a more traditional interface, but without current user feedback, usability remains uncertain.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 44 exclusive features, including multi-lingual/multi-currency support, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated payment terminals, automated night audits, and a marketplace with 1,000+ apps. Its comprehensive suite caters to modern hotel needs, from revenue management to guest engagement.
Jaras provides only one unique feature—on-premise deployment—while its core offerings focus on reservation management and automation. It does not match Mews’ breadth of features or third-party ecosystem.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores a 4.27/5, with recent reviews highlighting their quick response times, helpful onboarding, and proactive problem-solving. Many users note the availability of 24/7 live chat and dedicated onboarding teams as key strengths.
Jaras has no recent reviews, making it impossible to assess current support quality. Past feedback suggests limited support during implementation, but current data is lacking.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular tools like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable seamless connection to revenue management, channel distribution, and POS systems.
Jaras has no verified partners listed, indicating a limited or non-existent integration ecosystem. This restricts flexibility and scalability for hotels relying on third-party tools.
Edge: Mews.
With over 758 reviews, Mews’s 4.62/5 rating reflects strong, consistent satisfaction across hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and city-center properties. Recent reviews praise its user-friendly design and automation features, with some calling it “the most intuitive cloud platform on the market.”
Jaras has no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge current hotel perceptions. Its unknown status suggests it’s not widely adopted or trusted compared to Mews’ proven track record.
Edge: Mews.
Jaras charges a flat $1,000 monthly fee with no free trial, freemium, implementation, or per-room charges. Its pricing model appears straightforward but may lack flexibility for smaller properties.
Mews costs $900 per month, with no mention of implementation or additional fees; no trial info is available. Its slightly lower price point, combined with extensive features, offers a good value for scalable hotel operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews’s strengths lie in its vast feature set, global presence, and active user community, making it a reliable choice for hotels aiming to modernize operations. Its recent reviews reflect high satisfaction, ease of use, and a broad ecosystem that supports growth.
Jaras’s core offering is reservation automation and on-premise solutions, but with no recent feedback, its ability to compete today is uncertain. It might suit smaller hotels with very specific needs but lacks the proven scalability and integration Mews provides.
If you want a future-ready platform with extensive integrations and proven support, Mews is the clear winner. Choose Jaras only if your hotel’s focus is on centralized reservation management without complex integrations, and you’re prepared for limited recent user input.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収... Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収益分析において、より詳細なデータ分析を求める声がユーザーから上がっている。
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。JarasとMews PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Jarasは0件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Mews PMSは335件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Mews PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Jaras:いいえ。Mews PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。JarasのHT Scoreは0、Mewsは100です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー