The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
887件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、LMPMのユーザーはを最も評価し、Mewsのユーザーはease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibilityを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
| LMPM |
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
オンボーディングとサポート
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
レポート作成と分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #3 329件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #1 397件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #3 45件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #3 49件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #1 483件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #5 220件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #2 170件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #1 130件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | — | #8 106件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #1 660件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | — | #10 17件のレビュー |
| 中東 ▾ | — | #28 8件のレビュー |
Choosing between LMPM by LMPM and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature set, and user feedback. Do you prioritize a system with a proven track record and extensive integrations, or a niche solution tailored for vacation rentals with automation focus?
LMPM is a largely unreviewed system, offering minimal data and no recent feedback to support its claims, whereas Mews boasts over 750 recent reviews with a near-perfect rating. Given this, which platform provides the confidence and features your hotel needs to thrive today?
LMPM appears to be a property management system designed for vacation rentals, promising automation and real-time insights. However, with zero recent reviews and no rating available, there’s no clear evidence of its performance or user satisfaction. Conversely, Mews has a 4.62 out of 5 rating based on 758 reviews, with nearly 100 in the last six months alone—indicating ongoing development and strong user confidence.
While LMPM may claim to simplify operations, the absence of user feedback raises questions about its reliability and feature completeness. Mews, on the other hand, is a recognized leader in the space, especially for hotels seeking a robust, cloud-based platform. Is a vendor with proven reviews and active user engagement the safer choice for your hotel’s future?
If your hotel needs a flexible, well-supported PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. Its extensive marketplace and proven track record make it suitable for a range of property types, from boutique to large-scale operations. If you have very specific, niche needs for vacation rentals and prefer a system tailored solely for that segment, LMPM might seem appealing—though the lack of recent user feedback makes this a risky proposition.
For hotels prioritizing reliable support, continuous innovation, and proven scalability, Mews is the clear leader. LMPM’s limited data and unverified claims make it difficult to recommend confidently, especially when choosing a critical system that impacts daily operations and guest experiences.
Mews scores 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, based on more than 750 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training requirements. Reviews for LMPM provide no recent data or ratings, leaving its usability unverified and potentially unreliable.
Given the overwhelming user feedback, Mews’ user interface is modern, straightforward, and adaptable to staff needs. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated CRS, automated reminders, task management, real-time reporting, and extensive payment options. LMPM, by contrast, lists no features or integrations, leaving its functional scope entirely unknown.
Mews’ feature depth and active development cycle provide hotels with tools to optimize operations and guest engagement. Without verified features, LMPM cannot compete. Edge: Mews.
Mews has a 4.27 out of 5 rating for customer support, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users note that support is generally prompt, with issues resolved swiftly, despite occasional bugs.
LMPM’s support quality cannot be assessed as there are no recent reviews or ratings available. Given Mews’ active support ecosystem and positive feedback, it is the safer option. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, offering extensive flexibility. LMPM has zero verified integrations, limiting its connectivity and scalability.
This broad ecosystem allows hoteliers to customize workflows, automate processes, and connect with third-party solutions effortlessly. Without integrations, LMPM’s utility is severely limited. Edge: Mews.
Mews’ reviews are 4.62/5, based on 758 recent reviews, with a 93% likelihood to recommend and a high NPS score of 9.12/5. Hoteliers across segments—boutiques, hostels, city hotels—consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
LMPM’s lack of reviews and ratings means no data exists on user satisfaction. The recent, extensive feedback for Mews underscores its value and reliability. Edge: Mews.
LMPM does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a bespoke or undocumented fee structure. Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no implementation fee, but it’s a fixed fee typical for enterprise-grade PMS.
While Mews’s cost might seem higher, the value comes from its features, integrations, support, and proven track record. The opacity of LMPM’s pricing makes it difficult to evaluate its value proposition.
Given the lack of recent review data, LMPM is better suited for very small, uncomplicated setups where risk tolerance is high.
Mews supports a diverse range of hotel types, from boutique to large chains, with proven success in streamlining operations and enhancing guest experiences.
Mews stands out as a mature, well-supported, and feature-rich PMS with a large, active user base. Its extensive integrations, positive recent reviews, and proven track record make it the safer choice for hotels looking to modernize and grow.
LMPM’s limited data, unverified claims, and absence of recent reviews place it at a significant disadvantage. Unless your property operates in a highly niche market with minimal integration needs, Mews is the recommended platform to support your hotel’s future.
In conclusion, if confidence, functionality, and ongoing support are priorities, go with Mews. It offers the reliability and tools your hotel needs to succeed in today’s competitive landscape.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収... Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収益分析において、より詳細なデータ分析を求める声がユーザーから上がっている。
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。LMPMとMews PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。LMPMは0件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Mews PMSは335件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Mews PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
LMPM:いいえ。Mews PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。LMPMのHT Scoreは0、Mewsは100です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー