プロジェクトダッシュボードは、認証済みのホテル運営者のみが利用できる無料ツールです。調査を効率化し、コミュニケーションの流れを簡素化することで、新しいテクノロジーの導入を容易にします。
要点
43件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
Porter はモバイル向けに最適化/レスポンシブなどの独自機能で際立っています。
ThinkReservations はcustomer support and account managementにおいて優れており、特にB&B・イン施設(5.0/5)に適しています。
HTRの43件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューに基づく並列評価。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推奨度 |
|
|
| 使いやすさ |
|
|
| カスタマーサポート |
|
|
| コストパフォーマンス |
|
|
| 開始価格 | 営業にお問い合わせ | 営業にお問い合わせ |
| 認証済みレビュー | 10 | 33 |
43件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、Porterのユーザーはを最も評価し、ThinkReservationsのユーザーはcustomer support and account management, direct bookings and revenue growth, ease of use and simple navigationを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
Customer support and account management
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct bookings and revenue growth
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of use and simple navigation
▾
|
|
|
+
Property operations workflows
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Customization and feature gaps
▾
|
|
|
−
Bugs and workflow delays
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別のウェブサイトデザインベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) | #16 4件のレビュー | #1 4件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | #20 5件のレビュー | #7 0件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) | — | #3 0件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) | — | #2 0件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | #21 5件のレビュー | #5 6件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー | #20 3件のレビュー | #5 0件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン | #21 2件のレビュー | #3 1件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 | #13 1件のレビュー | #5 0件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | #24 0件のレビュー | #1 15件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | #9 9件のレビュー | #12 0件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 | — | #8 0件のレビュー |
| 中東 | — | #10 0件のレビュー |
Porter and ThinkReservations serve distinct hotel website needs, with Porter focusing exclusively on premium hotel website design and direct booking optimization, while ThinkReservations offers an integrated website and booking platform combined with property management tools. Porter excels in providing customizable, multi-lingual hotel websites rich with conversion-focused features, suited for hotels prioritizing brand-centric web presence. ThinkReservations fits small inns and bed & breakfasts that seek an all-in-one system uniting website, booking engine, PMS, and guest communications.
Both products address the core challenge of increasing direct bookings and reducing OTA dependence by improving the guest booking experience. They help hotels convert more lookers into bookers through attractive, functional websites connected to booking engines, but their approach and scope differ significantly.
If you run a boutique hotel or resort in Europe or Asia-Pacific aiming for a highly customizable, feature-rich website that supports multiple languages and direct booking benefits, Porter is the better choice. This recommendation rests on Porter’s exclusive features such as white-label capability, SEO plugins, and customizable themes, supported by a strong 4.7/5 rating across 10 reviews including 5-star feedback on marketing knowledge and site speed. However, Porter’s limited recent review volume (no reviews in the last six months) means its current product iteration is less evidenced.
If your property is a small bed and breakfast or inn in North America with a need for an integrated PMS, booking engine, website, and guest communication platform, choose ThinkReservations. It has 33 reviews with 29 in the last six months, all rating it 5/5 recently, indicating strong current performance and user satisfaction. ThinkReservations is especially suited for properties seeking operational consolidation, as evidenced by its user base composed predominantly of bed & breakfasts (9%) and boutique hotels (6%), with glowing reviews highlighting revenue growth and ease of use.
Both platforms reduce OTA reliance, but ThinkReservations provides a broader operational toolset beyond the website, while Porter specializes in driving direct bookings through branded site design.
Porter and ThinkReservations receive identical ease of use ratings of 4.9/5, with onboarding ratings close at 4.7/5 for Porter and 4.8/5 for ThinkReservations. Reviewers of Porter praise the platform for a user-friendly content management system that allows straightforward updates to text and photos without technical expertise, which benefits marketing teams and front desk staff managing site content. ThinkReservations users highlight an uncluttered, intuitive interface that simplifies daily hotel operations and reduces the learning curve for staff.
Onboarding for both is rated highly, with Porter users appreciating professionalism and quick turnaround during website build processes, while ThinkReservations customers note responsive support and continuous updates that ease adoption. Staff adoption should be seamless with either platform, particularly for small to mid-sized hotels with limited technical resources.
Edge: Even.
Porter offers 15 unique hotel website features absent from ThinkReservations, including critical capabilities such as white-labeling, multi-lingual support, full theme customization, SEO plugins, and conversion widgets. These features empower marketing teams to tailor websites extensively to brand identity, optimize search engine ranking, and implement direct booking incentives—all key to boosting direct channel performance. For example, customizable attraction maps and blog post composer help engage guests pre-arrival, supporting both branding and guest experience.
ThinkReservations does not list any exclusive website design features beyond those shared, focusing instead on integration with PMS and booking workflows. While this integration is operationally valuable, it means ThinkReservations lacks the broad range of website customization and marketing tools Porter provides.
Edge: Porter.
Porter scores a perfect 5/5 for customer support, while ThinkReservations follows closely with 4.9/5, both supported by robust onboarding scores. Porter reviewers commend the team’s flexibility, hospitality industry knowledge, and responsiveness, with one remarking, "I really call them our partner," highlighting a collaborative relationship that extends beyond technical support to marketing guidance.
ThinkReservations users value rapid phone support and knowledgeable account managers familiar with innkeeping challenges. However, some reviews mention delays in bug fixes and minor workflow issues, such as messaging lags, indicating occasional friction in support responsiveness for technical problems.
Given the marginal rating difference and positive feedback from both sides emphasizing approachable and expert support, the customer support experience is comparably strong.
Edge: Even.
ThinkReservations has 17 verified integrations, more than double Porter’s 7, with no overlap between their partner lists. ThinkReservations connects to major OTAs like Airbnb and Expedia, guest experience platforms such as TrustYou, and property management adjuncts like INTELITY and Whistle. These integrations suit hotels seeking a unified operational ecosystem, particularly in markets reliant on wide distribution and guest service technologies.
Porter’s integrations focus on digital marketing and booking optimization tools including SiteMinder, Revinate, Mews, and booking boosters like RoomRaccoon, targeting hotels emphasizing direct booking and marketing automation. Porter’s partnerships support conversion and distribution mix health but lack OTA channel breadth.
Hotels requiring broad channel connectivity and operational integration will prefer ThinkReservations; those prioritizing marketing and conversion optimization tools will lean toward Porter.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations leads with a 5/5 overall rating based on 33 reviews, 29 of which are from the last six months, indicating consistent current satisfaction. Porter’s 4.7/5 rating is solid but based on only 10 reviews with no recent feedback, reducing confidence that the rating reflects the current product state.
Segment ratings reinforce this: ThinkReservations scores a perfect 5/5 with 27 reviews from bed & breakfasts and 4.9/5 for boutique hotels (15 reviews), whereas Porter’s boutique hotel segment rates it 4.7/5 from 5 reviews. ThinkReservations also achieves 5/5 in city center hotels and 4.9/5 in resorts, while Porter’s resort rating is 4.5/5 from 3 reviews.
The volume, recency, and consistency of ThinkReservations reviews suggest higher satisfaction, especially among small inns and boutique properties. Porter’s ratings remain credible but less current and less voluminous.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Neither Porter nor ThinkReservations publish pricing publicly. Both do not offer freemium or free trial options, nor do they charge flat monthly or per-room fees openly. Implementation fees are not listed for either product.
Prospective buyers must contact vendors directly for cost details. This lack of transparency complicates direct price comparison but is common in customized hotel website services and integrated PMS/website platforms.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between Porter and ThinkReservations rests in scope and specialization. Porter delivers a premium hotel website design platform with 15 unique, hotel-specific features focused on brand customization, SEO, and conversion optimization. ThinkReservations offers an integrated booking and property management platform with a website, emphasizing operational consolidation and direct booking growth for smaller properties, especially bed & breakfasts.
Choose Porter if your hotel prioritizes a customizable, multi-lingual website with marketing plugins and conversion tools to enhance direct bookings. Porter’s strong customer support and design flexibility benefit boutique and resort hotels aiming for a distinct web presence. However, the lack of recent reviews and integration breadth may limit appeal for hotels seeking all-in-one solutions.
Choose ThinkReservations if your hotel seeks a proven all-in-one system with a 5/5 current rating from 29 recent reviews. Its integrated PMS, booking engine, and guest communication tools simplify small property operations while increasing direct bookings and revenue. It suits bed & breakfasts and inns that value responsive support and operational workflow consolidation but may require more website design freedom.
This comparison places Porter as the specialized website design leader and ThinkReservations as the integrated platform champion, making the choice dependent on your hotel’s operational complexity and marketing focus.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ウェブサイトデザイン の料金はわかりにくいことが多いです。各ベンダーの公開料金データから判明している情報をまとめました。施設の規模に合わせたカスタム見積もりを必ずご依頼ください。
|
|
|
|---|
これらは各ベンダーが設定した機能で、機能グループごとに整理されており、ベンダーダッシュボードに表示されるデータと同じです。グループを展開すると、機能を並べて比較できます。
| 機能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Design & Content Management
|
|
|
| ドラッグアンドドロップページビルダー | ||
| ホテルのウェブサイトテンプレート | ||
| ホワイトラベル機能 | ||
| 完全にカスタマイズ可能なテーマ | ||
| ブログ投稿作成者 | ||
| カスタマイズ可能な観光スポットマップ | ||
| ウェブサイトのパーソナライゼーション | ||
|
▾
Conversion
|
|
|
| GoogleAMPマークアップ | ||
| 店頭/バウチャーの機能 | ||
| モバイル向けに最適化/レスポンシブ | ||
| ウィジェットを確認する | ||
| 予約エンジン | ||
| ポップアップとアラート | ||
| カスタマイズ可能な観光スポットマップ | ||
| ウェブサイトのパーソナライゼーション | ||
|
▾
Internationalization
|
|
|
| 多言語 | ||
|
▾
Analytics
|
|
|
| Google Analytics Connection | ||
|
▾
SEO & Traffic
|
|
|
| ソーシャルメディアの統合 | ||
| GoogleAMPマークアップ | ||
| モバイル向けに最適化/レスポンシブ | ||
| 多言語 | ||
| SEOプラグイン | ||
| カスタマイズ可能な観光スポットマップ | ||
|
▾
Security & Compliance
|
|
|
| セキュリティプロトコル(SSL / HTTPS) | ||
| ADA準拠 | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| 店頭/バウチャーの機能 | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| 変換ウィジェット |
高評価の分野
独自の機能
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
Support is a major strength in the reviews, with users praising phone access, knowledgeable staff, and responsive account managers. Hotel operators sa... Support is a major strength in the reviews, with users praising phone access, knowledgeable staff, and responsive account managers. Hotel operators say the team understands innkeeping needs and helps resolve questions or issues quickly, which reduces operational friction.
Users repeatedly say ThinkReservations improves the booking funnel and drives more direct reservations, which translates into stronger revenue and les... Users repeatedly say ThinkReservations improves the booking funnel and drives more direct reservations, which translates into stronger revenue and less reliance on OTAs. Several reviews cite measurable gains in conversion rate, bookings, and overall revenue after switching to the platform.
The software is often described as easy to use, user-friendly, and uncluttered, making daily hotel operations less complicated. Reviewers value how qu... The software is often described as easy to use, user-friendly, and uncluttered, making daily hotel operations less complicated. Reviewers value how quickly they can find what they need and how the system supports efficient workflow without a steep learning curve.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
A recurring critical theme is that some users want more customization, such as color-coding room types, customizable UI, and more configurable email w... A recurring critical theme is that some users want more customization, such as color-coding room types, customizable UI, and more configurable email workflows. Reviewers generally like the product, but these comments suggest some properties may outgrow the default setup or need more tailoring.
A smaller but important set of reviews mentions occasional bugs or delays, especially in search engine fixes, messaging response timing, and room bloc... A smaller but important set of reviews mentions occasional bugs or delays, especially in search engine fixes, messaging response timing, and room block functionality. These issues do not dominate the feedback, but they matter for hotels that depend on fast guest communication and smooth booking operations.
高評価の分野
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。Porter - Premium Hotel WebsitesとThinkWeb Websitesは多くの主要なWebsite Design機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Porter - Premium Hotel Websitesは7件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、ThinkWeb Websitesは17件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Porter - Premium Hotel Websitesは使いやすさで4.9/5対4.9/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Porter - Premium Hotel Websites:いいえ。ThinkWeb Websites:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料プランを提供していません。ほとんどのWebsite Designベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — 契約する前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。PorterのHT Scoreは0、ThinkReservationsは84です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
お客様の施設に合わせたカスタム提案