The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 15 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
AeroGuest blinkt uit , met exclusieve functies zoals PMS Integration.
Hoteza blinkt uit in ROI and onboarding , met exclusieve functies zoals Lobby Kiosk.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 15 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 13 | 2 |
Hoe elk product scoort onder Contactloos inchecken-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) | #15 1 beoordelingen | #20 0 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #8 9 beoordelingen | #11 2 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) | #17 1 beoordelingen | #22 0 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) | #11 2 beoordelingen | #9 0 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 10 beoordelingen | #12 2 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | #11 5 beoordelingen | #12 1 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten | #19 1 beoordelingen | #16 0 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf | #16 0 beoordelingen | #17 0 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika | #12 0 beoordelingen | — |
| Europa ▾ | #8 12 beoordelingen | #11 1 beoordelingen |
| Azië-Pacific | — | #8 0 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten | #8 1 beoordelingen | #6 0 beoordelingen |
Choosing the right contactless check-in system for your hotel hinges on understanding each product’s strengths and limitations. AeroGuest Check-in by AeroGuest and Hoteza Check-In by Hoteza both aim to streamline arrivals, reduce queues, and enhance guest experiences, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, segment, and technological needs.
AeroGuest boasts broader adoption, more recent reviews, and a higher overall rating, making it a compelling choice if your priority is proven reliability and extensive integrations. Hoteza, despite fewer reviews, offers a highly rated, easy-to-use platform with strong support and customization options. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s operational goals?
Both AeroGuest and Hoteza focus on contactless check-in, reducing manual front-desk interactions and providing a smoother arrival experience. AeroGuest’s platform emphasizes automation with integrations to over 14 PMS systems, allowing full pre-arrival check-in and room selection, which is ideal for hotels seeking high levels of operational automation. Conversely, Hoteza’s solution is web-based and app-free, designed for quick, straightforward implementation, often favored by smaller or mid-sized hotels needing a simple, reliable solution.
While AeroGuest has a broader market footprint, including regions like North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, Hoteza maintains a strong presence mainly in North America, South America, and Europe. Both products aim to reduce queues and manual input, but AeroGuest’s more extensive integration ecosystem and broader geographic reach make it more adaptable for large or international hotels. Do you prioritize a globally proven solution or a straightforward, easy-to-deploy system?
If your hotel operates in a large market or requires integration with multiple PMS and third-party systems, AeroGuest is the better fit. Its 26 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and SiteMinder, provide seamless integration, making it ideal if automation and data flow are critical to your operations. AeroGuest’s high review count (11 reviews in the last six months) and 5/5 overall rating reflect proven customer satisfaction.
If your hotel is smaller, values simplicity, or wants a solution with a quick setup and high ease of use, Hoteza should be your choice. With only 2 recent reviews but a perfect 5/5 ease-of-use rating and support, Hoteza appeals to hotels prioritizing straightforward implementation and dedicated support. Its cloud-based, app-free approach minimizes tech complexity, suitable for properties that prefer minimal integration efforts.
In summary, choose AeroGuest if you need advanced automation and extensive integrations; opt for Hoteza if you prefer simplicity and direct support. Your hotel’s size and technological infrastructure should guide this decision.
AeroGuest scores 4.77/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its seamless, mobile-first approach that lets guests check in, select rooms, and pay before arrival. Its onboarding process averages 4.6/5, and users highlight the platform’s intuitive nature, though some note room for improved chat features outside the backend.
Hoteza, rated slightly higher at 5/5, is praised for its straightforward, web-based interface, which requires no app download. Its onboarding is rated perfect, with users finding it quick to teach staff and guests. Given Hoteza’s focus on simplicity and quick setup, it’s favored for properties that want minimal training and hassle.
Edge: Hoteza.
Both platforms share 18 core features, such as digital check-in, payment processing, and multilingual support. AeroGuest offers additional capabilities like PMS integration, a feature only it possesses, allowing it to connect seamlessly with existing property systems.
Hoteza provides unique features like Lobby Kiosk and Automatic Translations, which are absent in AeroGuest. Its customizable, multilingual interface and digital signature options enhance international guest handling. Overall, AeroGuest’s extensive integrations and feature set make it more comprehensive for large properties, while Hoteza’s simplicity and specialized features suit smaller hotels.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s support team scores 4.77/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, reliable assistance and smooth onboarding. Customers describe AeroGuest support as "responsive and helpful," though some suggest more proactive communication on emerging trends.
Hoteza’s support is rated perfect at 5/5, with reviews praising its promptness and personalized attention. Hotel staff appreciate the straightforward, effective support that helps them implement the platform quickly, especially for international properties with multilingual needs.
Edge: Hoteza.
AeroGuest boasts 26 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality, and integrations with channel managers and mobile access systems. Shared integrations include Stayntouch, Mews, and Vingcard, but AeroGuest’s broader partner list indicates greater flexibility for complex setups.
Hoteza offers 20 verified partners, including hotelkit, Shiji Group, and Amadeus, focusing more on hospitality-specific solutions but with fewer total integrations. If extensive third-party connectivity is vital, AeroGuest’s larger partner ecosystem provides a clear advantage.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s 11 recent reviews and overall 5/5 rating underscore its strong customer satisfaction, especially among city center and boutique hotels. Reviewers appreciate its automation, ease of use, and integration capabilities, with one noting, “AeroGuest makes the check-in process effortless, reducing queues and administrative work.”
Hoteza’s limited reviews (2 recent) and perfect 5/5 ratings reflect a highly favorable perception among early adopters, mainly in North America and Europe. Its simplicity and dedicated support earn praise, though the smaller sample size suggests less widespread validation.
Given the larger review base and higher recent activity, AeroGuest holds the edge.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest charges a base fee of $400, with no mention of additional implementation, monthly, or per-room fees. Its straightforward pricing appeals to hotels seeking predictable costs without extra charges.
Hoteza’s base price is $600, also without additional charges, but often requires a longer-term commitment for full deployment. While slightly more expensive, Hoteza’s pricing reflects its comprehensive features and support.
If budget is a primary concern, AeroGuest’s lower price point offers more value for similar core functionality. However, consider whether additional features justify the extra cost.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
AeroGuest and Hoteza both aim to simplify contactless check-in, but AeroGuest’s extensive integrations, broader global presence, and larger review base give it a decisive advantage. Its focus on automation and scalability makes it suitable for larger, complex hotels.
Choose AeroGuest if your goal is high-level automation, proven performance, and extensive system connectivity. Its broad market reach and recent high ratings assure reliability and ongoing support.
Opt for Hoteza if your hotel is smaller, values ease of use, quick setup, and personalized support. Its app-free design and simplicity make it ideal for properties seeking to enhance guest experiences without heavy tech investments.
In conclusion, AeroGuest is the more proven, feature-rich platform for most large or international hotels. Hoteza is a strong contender for properties valuing simplicity, quick deployment, and personalized support.
Note: This comparison is based solely on available reviews, feature lists, and pricing data. Your specific needs and technical environment will ultimately determine the best fit.
Prijzen voor Contactloos inchecken zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen AeroGuest Check-in en Hoteza Check-In 18 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatische vertalingen | ||
| Lobbykiosk | ||
| PMS-integratie |
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. AeroGuest Check-in en Hoteza Check-In delen veel kern-Contactless Check-in-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. AeroGuest Check-in biedt 26 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Hoteza Check-In er 20 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Hoteza Check-In scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
AeroGuest Check-in: Nee. Hoteza Check-In: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Contactless Check-in-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. AeroGuest heeft een HT Score van 0 en Hoteza heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Aanbevelingen op maat, afgestemd op uw woning.