Clock HMS vs. Seekom/iBex:
Welke past bij u?

The Decision

Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and Seekom/iBex by Seekom hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both platforms serve as hotel management systems, but Clock’s broader feature set and recent review momentum make it a more compelling option for hotels seeking a comprehensive, scalable solution. Seekom offers solid core PMS features, but with a smaller review base and limited recent feedback, it may lack the depth your team requires.

Your decision should consider whether you prioritize a system with extensive integrations, advanced guest management, and ongoing support (Clock), or if a more straightforward PMS with basic channel management suffices (Seekom). Are you ready to handle a more feature-rich platform that can scale with your hotel’s growth?

Is Clock HMS or Seekom/iBex Better for Hotels?

Both Clock and Seekom aim to streamline hotel operations, but their core offerings diverge significantly. Clock provides a broad suite of features, including guest feedback management, direct billing, online check-in, and automated reminders, all integrated into one platform. Seekom offers essential PMS functions, plus an integrated channel manager, but with fewer unique features and partners.

Clock’s recent reviews (63 reviews, 5 in last 6 months) reflect higher confidence, with a 4.88/5 overall rating and a 9.48/5 NPS score, indicating strong user satisfaction. Seekom, with only 8 reviews and no recent feedback, lacks the same recent validation. Does your hotel need a feature-rich system that supports complex operations and guest engagement, or a simpler solution that covers basic needs?

Clock vs Seekom: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel operates in a competitive market, needs advanced guest engagement, automated revenue management, or plans to expand, Clock is the clear choice. It excels in offering over 39 features exclusive to its platform, such as guest messaging, digital registration, integrated ID scanners, and extensive reporting tools, making it ideal for hotels aiming to boost revenue and guest experience.

Seekom is better suited for small to medium properties, especially motels and budget hotels, where core PMS functions suffice. Its limited feature set and fewer integrations mean it’s a more straightforward, less complex option. If your focus is on managing basic operations efficiently, Seekom might fit—but for growth and scalability, Clock is superior.

Is Clock HMS or Seekom/iBex Easier to Use?

Clock’s UI boasts a high ease of use rating at 4.73/5, with many reviews emphasizing its user-friendly design and straightforward navigation. The onboarding process, rated at 4.71/5, is smooth with ongoing support, though initial setup may be complex for some users.

Seekom’s UI ranks significantly lower at 3.69/5, with reviews indicating that staff find the interface less intuitive and the learning curve steeper. The onboarding experience is rated at 3.75/5, and users suggest that navigating the system can be cumbersome, especially when managing multiple bookings or checking system updates.

Edge: Clock.

Which Has Better Features: Clock or Seekom?

Clock offers an extensive feature set—over 39 features exclusive to its platform—including guest feedback tools, online check-in/out, integrated ID scanners, real-time reporting, and task management. Its capabilities extend to automated reminders, group booking functions, and integrated payment terminals, providing a comprehensive management environment.

Seekom, with only 3 unique features—website development, native email marketing, and a revenue management module—lacks the breadth of Clock’s offerings. While it provides essential PMS and channel management, it doesn’t match Clock’s depth of operational tools.

Edge: Clock.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Clock or Seekom?

Clock’s customer support rate at 4.78/5, with reviews highlighting quick, efficient responses and dedicated support teams. Guests frequently note the support team’s responsiveness and willingness to help resolve issues, with comments like “excellent support and quick problem resolution” in recent reviews.

Seekom’s support scores at 4.38/5, with reviews praising their helpfulness but noting that some complex queries can take longer to resolve. The smaller team size and limited recent feedback make Clock’s support more credible and responsive in today’s context.

Edge: Clock.

Which Has More Integrations: Clock or Seekom?

Clock boasts 111 verified partners, including major OTAs, CRMs, and revenue tools—such as RateGain, RoomPriceGenie, and RevControl—offering broad connectivity. It also has no connection fees on integrations, which enhances value for hotels needing extensive system interoperability.

Seekom’s integration count is limited to 5 verified partners, with only four shared with Clock. It offers essential OTAs and channel management but lacks the extensive connectivity Clock provides, potentially limiting your hotel’s automation and data flow.

Edge: Clock.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Clock or Seekom?

Clock’s reviews are more recent and plentiful, with a 4.88/5 overall rating and a 9.48/10 NPS, indicating high satisfaction across diverse segments—independent, boutique, and city hotels. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and breadth of features, with comments like “a fabulous, cloud-based product” and “constant updates and improvements.”

Seekom, however, has fewer reviews—only 8—and a slightly lower overall rating at 4.86/5, all from motels and budget properties. While positive, the limited recent feedback suggests less current usability validation.

Edge: Clock.

How Much Do Clock HMS and Seekom/iBex Cost?

Clock charges a flat base fee of $600 per month, with no freemium tier, implementation fees, or per-room charges. This transparent pricing allows for predictable budgeting.

Seekom’s pricing is not publicly listed, with no trial information or detailed fee structure available. Its lack of transparency could lead to unforeseen costs, especially as your hotel scales.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Clock?

• Hotels that need a complete management system capable of handling reservations, guest engagement, and revenue optimization.
• Properties seeking extensive integrations with OTAs, CRMs, and revenue tools.
• Teams that value a user-friendly platform with advanced features like online check-in, guest messaging, and task automation.
• Hotels aiming for scalable solutions to grow operations with ongoing support.

Not ideal if you run a small, budget property with minimal operational complexity or limited budget for high-end features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Seekom?

• Small hotels, motels, or budget properties looking for reliable PMS and basic channel management.
• Teams that prefer a straightforward, cost-effective solution without extensive customization.
• Hotels with minimal guest engagement needs, focusing primarily on reservations and occupancy.
• Properties that operate within the European or Asian Pacific regions, where Seekom has a stronger regional presence.

Not ideal if you need advanced guest management features, integrations, or plan to scale significantly.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Clock is a comprehensive, feature-rich PMS platform suited for hotels that want to grow, innovate, and optimize revenue. Its extensive integrations, recent positive reviews, and advanced guest management set it apart from Seekom’s more basic offering.

Seekom remains a viable choice for small, budget properties prioritizing core PMS functions without the need for complex integrations or guest engagement tools. Its limited recent reviews and feature set make it less suitable for hotels aiming for expansion or sophisticated operations.

Ultimately, if your hotel wants a scalable, well-supported platform with proven performance, Clock is the clear winner. For simpler needs, Seekom can serve adequately, but it lacks the depth and recent validation of Clock.