The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 171 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
DJUBO blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support , met exclusieve functies zoals Payment Requests and Online Check-in.
Visual Matrix PMS blinkt uit als het gaat om technical support challenges , met exclusieve functies zoals Guest Messaging and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 171 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 19 | 152 |
Na analyse van 171 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen DJUBO-gebruikers vooral de , terwijl Visual Matrix PMS-gebruikers de technical support challenges, gebruiksvriendelijke interface, comprehensive reporting tools benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
Gebruiksvriendelijke interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
Systeemsnelheid en beschikbaarheid van functies
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Hotelmanagementsoftware-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #31 3 beoordelingen | #18 23 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #43 0 beoordelingen | #2 117 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | — | #11 5 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) | #25 0 beoordelingen | #16 1 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 2 beoordelingen | #12 38 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | #31 2 beoordelingen | #16 17 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | #39 0 beoordelingen | #1 124 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf ▾ | #31 0 beoordelingen | #4 44 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | #33 0 beoordelingen | #7 141 beoordelingen |
| Europa | — | #32 1 beoordelingen |
| Azië-Pacific | #10 3 beoordelingen | #18 2 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten | #16 0 beoordelingen | — |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly impact your operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both DJUBO and Visual Matrix PMS aim to streamline your hotel’s daily tasks, but their approaches and strengths differ. DJUBO offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform that consolidates multiple functions, while Visual Matrix PMS specializes in operational efficiency with robust features and integrations. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
DJUBO is a cloud-based, all-in-one platform designed to unify your PMS, channel manager, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office functions. It’s built for hotels seeking a centralized system that reduces reliance on multiple disconnected tools, delivering real-time control across operations. Visual Matrix PMS, on the other hand, focuses on optimizing core hotel tasks with an emphasis on automation, staff coordination, and seamless integrations, especially suitable for understaffed properties or those needing quick operational boosts.
The key divergence lies in their scope: DJUBO consolidates many functionalities into one system, while Visual Matrix PMS emphasizes operational speed and ease of use with extensive integrations. DJUBO, with a perfect overall rating of 5/5 and more recent active reviews, clearly demonstrates strong adoption and confidence among hoteliers. Visual Matrix PMS boasts a broader user base, particularly in branded hotels, with a 3.75/5 overall score based on more reviews and a more established presence.
Are you looking for an all-in-one solution that reduces complexity, or a specialized PMS that integrates well with existing tools? Your choice depends on your hotel’s scale, staff capacity, and operational priorities.
If your hotel needs a single platform to handle reservations, channel management, POS, revenue, and accounting, DJUBO is the better fit. Its broad feature set, including unique offerings like online check-in and payment requests, makes it appealing for independent hotels and multi-property groups seeking streamlined management.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, staff automation, and extensive integrations with third-party systems, Visual Matrix PMS is ideal. Its focus on automation tools like housekeeping, shift planning, and guest messaging—paired with a large partner network—serves understaffed or tech-savvy properties well. For branded hotels looking for a flexible, well-supported platform, Visual Matrix often meets those needs better.
In summary, choose DJUBO when you need a comprehensive, all-in-one management suite. Opt for Visual Matrix PMS if your focus is operational automation, staff coordination, and extensive third-party integrations.
DJUBO scores a remarkable 4.95/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users highlight how quickly staff can adapt to DJUBO, citing the platform's simplicity despite its wide scope, and appreciate its user-friendly design across multiple modules. Training sessions are rated highly, reducing the learning curve for new team members.
Visual Matrix PMS also earns a strong 4.43/5 in usability, with many users citing its familiar interface and ease of navigation. However, some mention that system speed issues and feature bloat can hamper workflows, especially during peak times. Support and onboarding are generally rated well, but the speed limitations are a common concern among users.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers 42 features, including unique capabilities like online check-in and payment requests, not available in Visual Matrix PMS. These features support guest self-service and streamlined payments, which are increasingly important in modern hospitality.
Visual Matrix PMS boasts 40 shared features, with 15 additional exclusive functionalities like guest messaging, integrated payment terminals, drag-and-drop tape charts, and guest CRM. Its automation tools, such as shift planning and GDPR compliance, enhance operational control and staff management.
While both systems are rich in features, DJUBO’s unique offerings around payments and check-in give it a slight edge for properties focused on guest experience. Visual Matrix PMS’s automation and extensive integrations make it a strong choice for operational efficiency.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO is rated 4.76/5 for customer support, with reviews emphasizing its supportive staff and ongoing upgrades. One reviewer highlighted, “The support team is always available and very professional,” reflecting its strong reputation for responsiveness.
Visual Matrix PMS has a support rating of 4.34/5, with users appreciating knowledgeable tech support and helpful weekly tips. Some reviewers mention occasional difficulties in reaching support quickly during critical moments, but overall, support is considered reliable.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO features 3 verified integration partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but its ecosystem is relatively limited. This might restrict your ability to connect with specialized third-party tools if your hotel requires extensive custom integrations.
Visual Matrix PMS offers 23 verified partners, including Hotel Investor Apps, SiteMinder, SkyTouch, and LaaSie.ai. Its broader ecosystem allows more flexible connections with booking engines, POS systems, and revenue tools, making it suitable for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
DJUBO has a higher review count (19 reviews), with an outstanding overall rating of 5/5 and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, comprehensive features, and excellent support, especially in the last six months.
Visual Matrix PMS, with 143 reviews and a 3.75/5 rating, has a more extensive history of user feedback. Its recent reviews highlight its operational strengths but also point to speed issues and some missing functionalities. Its higher review volume suggests a mature product with steady user experience.
Considering recency and scores, DJUBO’s reviews lend it a significant edge for current hotelier confidence.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO does not publicly list specific pricing, indicating a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. It operates on a subscription model without a free tier or trial, making its cost structure less transparent upfront.
Visual Matrix PMS charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no free trial or tier, and no mention of additional costs. Pricing appears straightforward but may be prohibitive for smaller properties or those seeking flexible plans.
In absence of clear, comparable data, your best bet is to request quotes directly from vendors to assess value based on your hotel’s requirements.
Not ideal if you require extensive third-party integrations or highly specialized billing features. Smaller boutique hotels might find DJUBO’s comprehensive approach too broad or costly.
Not ideal if speed and system responsiveness are critical during peak times or if your property relies heavily on advanced billing functionalities absent in the platform.
DJUBO stands out as a highly rated, all-in-one platform with a perfect review score and recent positive feedback. It suits independent hotels and multi-property groups that want unified control over their operations without juggling multiple tools.
Visual Matrix PMS excels in operational automation, extensive integrations, and support for understaffed hotels. Its broad feature set and established presence make it ideal for branded hotels and properties seeking a flexible, automation-driven system.
If simplicity, ease of use, and comprehensive functionality are your priorities, DJUBO is the clear choice. If your focus is on operational efficiency, automation, and extensive third-party connections, Visual Matrix PMS will serve you better.
For most hotels actively evaluating these options today, DJUBO’s more recent reviews and higher satisfaction ratings position it as the more reliable and scalable solution.
Prijzen voor Hotelmanagementsoftware zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Djubo en Visual Matrix PMS 40 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Berichten voor werknemers | ||
| Betalingsverzoeken | ||
| Drag-n-drop-lintdiagram | ||
| Gastberichten | ||
| Gecentraliseerd gebruikers- en rollenbeheer | ||
| Gecentraliseerde berichten | ||
| Geïntegreerde betaalterminal en kaartlezer | ||
| Online inchecken |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 5 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Wat hoteliers waarderen
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
Het intuïtieve ontwerp van Visual Matrix verkort de leercurve, waardoor het toegankelijk is voor nieuwe medewerkers. Sommige gebruikers melden echter... Het intuïtieve ontwerp van Visual Matrix verkort de leercurve, waardoor het toegankelijk is voor nieuwe medewerkers. Sommige gebruikers melden echter aanvankelijke problemen bij de overstap van andere systemen.
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Djubo en Visual Matrix PMS delen veel kern-Hotel Management Software-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Djubo biedt 3 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Visual Matrix PMS er 23 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Djubo scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.9/5 vs 4.4/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Djubo: Nee. Visual Matrix PMS: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Hotel Management Software-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. DJUBO heeft een HT Score van 0 en Visual Matrix PMS heeft 80. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen