The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 172 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Guestnet blinkt uit in customer support , met exclusieve functies zoals Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
Liverton blinkt uit , met exclusieve functies zoals Hotel Website Check-in Portal and Lobby Kiosk.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 172 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $500/mo | From $500/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 165 | 7 |
Na analyse van 172 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Guestnet-gebruikers vooral de user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, positieve gastervaring, terwijl Liverton-gebruikers de benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
Positieve gastervaring
▾
|
|
|
+
Aanpassing en flexibiliteit
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Integratie met externe systemen
▾
|
|
|
−
Pushmeldingen en waarschuwingen
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Hotelgast-apps-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #2 56 beoordelingen | — |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #2 85 beoordelingen | #22 4 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) | #17 2 beoordelingen | #15 2 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) | #23 0 beoordelingen | #14 1 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 52 beoordelingen | #24 2 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 66 beoordelingen | #19 3 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | #7 18 beoordelingen | #19 2 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf ▾ | #3 14 beoordelingen | — |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika | #13 3 beoordelingen | #21 0 beoordelingen |
| Europa ▾ | #2 158 beoordelingen | — |
| Azië-Pacific | #16 0 beoordelingen | — |
As a hotelier weighing Guestnet by Guestnet and Guest Services by Liverton, your main challenge is selecting a platform that elevates your guest experience while streamlining operations. Both products aim to modernize guest interactions through digital touchpoints, but they differ significantly in features, user feedback, and overall market presence. Guestnet’s high review count and recent positive feedback make it the more reliable choice today.
Are you prioritizing wider adoption and proven success, or are you seeking a highly customizable platform with a broader feature set? Let’s compare each product’s strengths and weaknesses to help you decide.
Guestnet and Guest Services target similar problems—enhancing guest engagement and operational efficiency through digital interfaces—but they diverge in their approach and maturity. Guestnet is a comprehensive, fully integrated guest app designed to support communication, upselling, and information sharing without requiring app downloads, which fosters high guest adoption. Meanwhile, Liverton’s Guest Services offers extensive in-room features like digital check-in, room selection, and F&B ordering, emphasizing in-room convenience.
Guestnet’s platform has a higher review volume (152 reviews, 51 in the last six months) and a superior recent rating, indicating broader hotel trust and ongoing support. Liverton’s smaller review base (7 reviews, none in the last six months) limits confidence in its current performance and market standing. Given the recent activity and higher ratings, Guestnet is the safer bet for reliable, well-supported digital guest engagement.
If your hotel needs a versatile, easy-to-integrate guest communication platform that enhances pre-arrival, stay, and post-stay interactions—especially with a focus on automation and multi-channel messaging—Guestnet is the clear choice. Its high NPS score (9.51/5) and 152 reviews, including recent ones, show consistent user satisfaction, especially among luxury and boutique hotels.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes a robust in-room experience with features like digital check-in, room selection, F&B ordering, and in-room service requests, Liverton’s platform aligns better. Its feature set includes device-agnostic check-in, digital compendium, and QR-based ordering, suited for properties aiming to modernize in-room services.
For most hotels, especially those valuing proven support and broader market confidence, Guestnet is the recommended solution. Its track record of recent positive reviews and higher ratings make it the more dependable choice.
Guestnet’s UI boasts a 4.74/5 ease of use rating, with many reviewers emphasizing its intuitive design and quick staff onboarding. Guests find it straightforward and engaging, with many noting how it simplifies communication and service access, leading to high adoption.
Liverton’s platform scores slightly lower at 4.57/5, with some users mentioning the need for further clarity during implementation. While both are rated highly, the larger review base for Guestnet provides stronger evidence of a smoother, more consistent user experience.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet offers 12 unique features, including request management, room service ordering, guest profiles, and multi-lingual support. However, it lacks in-room check-in, keyless entry, and F&B ordering directly from guests’ devices.
Liverton presents 20 features, including self-check-in/out, device-agnostic solutions, ID verification, PCI compliance, and door lock integration. It provides advanced in-room functionalities, such as dynamic menu pricing, pre-arrival upselling, and multiple payment options, making it more feature-rich for in-room and check-in processes.
While Liverton’s broader feature set is compelling, its limited recent reviews and smaller user base make Guestnet’s more streamlined, proven feature set the safer choice.
Edge: Liverton.
Guestnet’s support ratings are notably higher at 4.82/5, with many reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Customers describe their support team as "always available and helpful," with quick problem resolution and ongoing assistance.
Liverton’s support scores 4.29/5, and reviewers mention that while the team is technically knowledgeable, some technical issues and onboarding challenges have been experienced. Given the more extensive recent positive feedback, Guestnet’s support is more reliable and consistent.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet boasts 20 verified integration partners, including major names like Mews, Shiji, ASA Hotelsoftware, and Websline. It also connects with key hotel management systems and third-party apps, offering flexibility for diverse property ecosystems.
Liverton has 8 verified partners, including RMS, Cloudbeds, and Oracle Hospitality, but fewer integrations overall. While Liverton’s integrations cover key systems, Guestnet’s broader partner network provides greater flexibility and future-proofing.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s recent reviews reflect a very high satisfaction level, with a 9.51/5 NPS score and 95% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across luxury, boutique, and resort segments praise its ease of use, support, and automation.
Liverton’s ratings are limited, with only 7 reviews and no recent feedback, making it difficult to gauge current hotel satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of Guestnet reviews, it clearly enjoys stronger hotel trust and advocacy.
Edge: Guestnet.
Both products are priced at a base fee of $500, with no additional implementation or monthly per-room charges, making them comparable in cost. Since neither offers a freemium or trial, your decision hinges on value and fit rather than price.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Guestnet’s core advantage is its proven, high-volume, recent reviews, and extensive integrations. Its platform is well-suited for hotels prioritizing guest communication and operational automation without in-room focus.
Guest Services offers a broader feature set aimed at in-room digital experiences, including check-in, keyless entry, and F&B ordering. Its comprehensive functionalities make it ideal for hotels seeking to modernize in-room services and optimize guest in-room interactions.
For most hotels, especially those valuing support and a mature ecosystem, Guestnet remains the safer, more tested choice. If in-room technology and direct guest engagement are your top priorities, then Liverton’s platform warrants consideration.
Guestnet by Guestnet is the more reliable and widely adopted digital guest app, with a higher review count, recent positive feedback, and strong integration options. Its focused feature set and excellent support make it ideal for hotels looking to improve communication, streamline operations, and boost guest satisfaction.
While Liverton’s Guest Services offers a compelling suite of in-room features—especially for properties emphasizing in-room convenience—the smaller review base and lack of recent feedback make its current performance less certain.
In conclusion, if your goal is to choose a proven, well-supported platform with a broad hotel user base, Guestnet is the clear choice. However, if your property’s primary need is cutting-edge in-room technology and advanced upselling, Liverton could be worth exploring further once it garners more recent reviews and market traction.
Prijzen voor Hotelgast-apps zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $500/mo |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Guestnet en Guest Services by SmartStay 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Apparaat agnostisch | ||
| Eenvoudige kamerselectie | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Hotellijst | ||
| Incheckportaal van hotelwebsite | ||
| Lobbykiosk | ||
| Lokale aanbevelingen | ||
| Roomservice bestellen | ||
| Verzoekbeheer | ||
| Web applicatie | ||
| Zelf inchecken | ||
| Zelfbediening Afrekenen |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 20 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 7 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
Veel recensenten melden een grotere tevredenheid onder gasten door de snelle toegang tot hoteldiensten en -voorzieningen via Guestnet. Dit leidt tot p... Veel recensenten melden een grotere tevredenheid onder gasten door de snelle toegang tot hoteldiensten en -voorzieningen via Guestnet. Dit leidt tot positieve feedback en mogelijk tot meer terugkerende gasten.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Reviewers zijn positief over de integratie van Guestnet met lokale toerismegegevens en hotelbeheersystemen. Sommigen geven echter aan dat er behoefte... Reviewers zijn positief over de integratie van Guestnet met lokale toerismegegevens en hotelbeheersystemen. Sommigen geven echter aan dat er behoefte is aan verdere integratie om de automatisering te verbeteren en handmatige taken te verminderen.
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Guestnet en Guest Services by SmartStay delen veel kern-Hotel Guest Apps-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Guestnet biedt 20 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Guest Services by SmartStay er 8 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Guestnet scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Guestnet: Nee. Guest Services by SmartStay: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Hotel Guest Apps-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Guestnet heeft een HT Score van 96 en Liverton heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen