HiRUM HMS vs. RMS:
Welke past bij u?

The Decision

Choosing the right hotel management software can transform your operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both HiRUM HMS and RMS aim to streamline management tasks, but they cater to different hotel profiles and organizational needs. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and regional presence—each product offers distinct strengths.

While HiRUM boasts a smaller review base and more limited global reach, RMS offers a broader feature set and a larger, more recent review pool. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans and operational requirements?

Is HiRUM HMS or RMS Better for Hotels?

Both HiRUM HMS and RMS aim to simplify hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scope, user experience, and regional presence. HiRUM, developed in Australia, is primarily used by smaller properties and resorts, emphasizing ease of trust accounting and integration with online booking channels like HiSITE. RMS, by contrast, is a globally trusted platform serving thousands of hotels, including large chains and multi-property groups across multiple continents.

The key difference is in their scale: HiRUM has a limited global footprint with only two countries covered and 27 reviews, mostly older, reflecting a niche user base. RMS has a presence in over 70 countries, with more than 224 recent reviews, showing active, current user engagement. Do you prioritize a smaller, local system or a globally proven platform?

RMS vs HiRUM: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel is a small to mid-sized property seeking a straightforward, Australian-based solution with high ease of use and excellent customer support, HiRUM fits well. Its simple interface and focus on trust accounting make it ideal for resorts and boutique hotels in Australia and nearby regions.

However, if your hotel is part of a larger chain, expanding internationally, or requires extensive integrations and advanced revenue management features, RMS is the clearer choice. RMS’s broad feature set—including channel management, booking engine, guest CRM, and multi-lingual support—makes it more adaptable for diverse and growing hotel portfolios.

Is HiRUM or RMS Easier to Use?

HiRUM scores a remarkable 4.63/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its user-friendly navigation and straightforward setup. Many users highlight its simple processes, especially for trust accounting and end-of-month reporting, which reduces training time.

RMS, while slightly behind with a 4.3/5 score, still receives praise for its intuitive reservation management and seamless integration with third-party channels. However, some users note that frequent software updates can cause brief disruptions, and the system’s extensive features may require a learning curve.

Edge: HiRUM.

Which Has Better Features: HiRUM or RMS?

RMS offers a significantly larger suite of features—74 unique functionalities—covering channel management, booking engine, revenue management, integrated CRS, POS, guest CRM, and more. This extensive toolkit supports multi-property management, automation, and guest engagement at scale.

HiRUM, with its focus on core property management and trust accounting, provides essential hotel operations features but lacks many advanced modules available in RMS. If your hotel needs comprehensive automation and third-party integrations, RMS has the edge.

Edge: RMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: HiRUM or RMS?

HiRUM’s customer support stands out with a 4.78/5 rating, and reviews frequently commend its responsive, knowledgeable Australian-based team. Hoteliers appreciate their proactive approach and detailed assistance, especially for onboarding and troubleshooting.

RMS’s support, rated at 4.52/5, is also well-regarded, with users noting helpful and responsive staff. Some reviews mention occasional delays or frustration with software updates causing temporary disruptions. Overall, HiRUM’s support feels slightly more personalized and attentive.

Edge: HiRUM.

Which Has More Integrations: HiRUM or RMS?

RMS boasts 112 verified integrations, nearly nine times HiRUM’s 13. Both platforms connect with popular partners like TrustYou, SiteMinder, Revinate, and Airbnb. RMS’s broader partner network includes additional hotel-specific tools such as Criton, Sage, and STR, facilitating extensive automation and multi-channel distribution.

HiRUM’s integrations are fewer but focus on core hospitality tools, mainly Australian and regional partners. If extensive integrations with global OTAs and revenue tools are critical, RMS wins.

Edge: RMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: HiRUM or RMS?

RMS enjoys a higher overall rating—4.56/5 based on 224 recent reviews—indicating a highly satisfied user base. Its users, especially from larger, multi-property hotels, frequently praise its automation, integration, and scalability.

HiRUM’s rating is 3.5/5 from just 27 reviews, with consistent comments about ease of use and value, but limited recent feedback makes it less reliable for current performance insights. RMS’s larger, more recent review base gives it the clear edge.

Edge: RMS.

How Much Do HiRUM and RMS Cost?

HiRUM does not publicly disclose pricing, but it is typically sold as a licensed, on-premise solution, implying higher upfront costs and ongoing maintenance. RMS charges a fixed monthly fee of $700, with no mention of additional implementation or setup costs.

Your actual expenditure on HiRUM may vary depending on customization and support packages, but RMS’s transparent, subscription-based pricing makes budgeting easier.

What Type of Hotel Should Use HiRUM?

• Hotels that primarily operate within Australia or nearby regions.
• Resorts and boutique properties seeking a simple, reliable PMS.
• Hotels that prioritize trust accounting and direct control over data.
• Properties with staff comfortable with on-premise solutions and less need for extensive integrations.
• Small to mid-sized hotels aiming for ease of use and local support.

Not ideal if your hotel plans rapid international growth or requires extensive third-party integrations. Larger chains or properties aiming for scalability and automation may find HiRUM limiting.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RMS?

• Hotels with multiple properties or planning expansion across regions.
• Large or chain hotels requiring extensive automation and integrations.
• Properties seeking advanced revenue management and channel distribution.
• Hotels that need customizable rates and guest engagement tools.
• Businesses looking for real-time insights and automated workflows.

Not ideal if your hotel is small, operates in a single region, or prefers a simple, on-premise solution without cloud-based features.

RMS vs HiRUM: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference lies in their scope: RMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform suitable for larger, multi-property hotels, while HiRUM offers a focused, regional solution tailored for smaller properties and resorts.

Choose HiRUM if your hotel values high ease of use, strong support, and trust accounting, especially within Australia. RMS is the better option if you need a scalable, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and international presence.

If your hotel is growing or managing multiple properties across regions, RMS’s broader capabilities and recent reviews make it the safer, more future-proof choice. Conversely, for smaller, regional operations seeking straightforward management, HiRUM remains a dependable, user-friendly option.

This comparison aims to clarify your decision, but always consider your specific operational needs and future plans before committing. Both products excel in different areas, so aligning their strengths with your hotel’s priorities will ensure the best fit.