The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 23 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
roommaster blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support .
Shiji Group blinkt uit , met exclusieve functies zoals Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments and Recurring Payments.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 23 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $300/mo | From $200/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 23 | 0 |
Hoe elk product scoort onder Software voor betalingsverwerking-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #2 6 beoordelingen | — |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #3 7 beoordelingen | #9 0 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) | #4 1 beoordelingen | #5 0 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) | #4 0 beoordelingen | — |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 7 beoordelingen | #7 0 beoordelingen |
| Luxe | #5 0 beoordelingen | #6 0 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten | #4 1 beoordelingen | #6 0 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf | #4 0 beoordelingen | — |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | #4 14 beoordelingen | #7 0 beoordelingen |
| Europa | #5 0 beoordelingen | #8 0 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten | #3 0 beoordelingen | — |
Choosing between roommaster Payments by roommaster and Shiji Astral Payments by Shiji Group hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both promise to streamline payment processes, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market reach. Your team needs a solution that not only fits your operational model but also offers reliable support and integrations. So, which payment platform is the better fit for your hotel?
Both products aim to improve transaction efficiency, reduce manual work, and handle complex payment scenarios. However, roommaster Payments is more focused on integrating directly within PMS systems, especially for North American markets, whereas Shiji Astral Payments emphasizes broad payment method support and global scalability. Do you prioritize regional reliability or international features?
roommaster Payments is designed primarily for hotels that want a straightforward, integrated payment solution within their existing PMS environment. Its strength lies in automating deposits, pre-authorizations, and reconciliation, especially for properties in North America and regions where it has established its presence. The reviews highlight solid ease of use and strong customer support, but recent user feedback criticizes stability issues and system errors, especially after recent cloud platform upgrades.
Conversely, Shiji Astral Payments offers a broader set of features, supporting multiple currencies, a wide range of payment methods (including Apple Pay, Google Pay, Alipay, WeChatPay), and comprehensive security protocols. It is a cloud-native platform, ideal for hotels seeking global reach and multiple payment channels. However, it lacks user reviews, making it harder to gauge real-world performance and support quality. Which of these priorities aligns with your hotel’s operational goals?
If your hotel needs a reliable, easy-to-implement solution with proven support in North America and a focus on simplifying payment workflows within a PMS, go with roommaster Payments. Its 20 reviews, mostly recent, and high support ratings (4.45/5) demonstrate strong user satisfaction in stability and support.
If your hotel operates across multiple regions, handles numerous currencies, and requires a diverse array of payment methods, Shiji Astral Payments is the better choice. Its extensive feature set—supporting over a dozen payment types and integrations with POS systems—makes it suitable for larger, international properties. However, the lack of user reviews indicates a need for careful evaluation before deployment.
roommaster Payments boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.4/5, supported by reviews praising its straightforward interface and simple onboarding process. Users report that staff can adapt quickly, and the system integrates well with the PMS, streamlining daily operations. However, recent reviews mention stability issues and system outages that hinder usability.
Shiji Astral Payments, being cloud-based, typically offers a modern interface with intuitive features, but no user reviews are available to confirm this. Its extensive payment method support might introduce complexity, especially during initial setup, which could impact staff adoption. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Shiji Astral Payments supports 15 unique features, including multi-currency settlements, dynamic currency conversion, and acceptance of diverse payment methods like AliPay, WeChatPay, and Apple Pay. Its integrations with POS and PMS systems further extend its capabilities, making it suitable for hotels seeking extensive flexibility.
roommaster Payments offers 13 shared features, focusing on core payment functions such as deposits, pre-authorizations, and dispute management. It does not support as many payment methods or currencies but excels in automating reconciliation and reducing manual effort within PMS environments. Edge: Shiji Astral Payments.
roommaster Payments benefits from a support rating of 4.45/5, with reviews frequently praising their responsiveness and helpfulness. Users report that support technicians are knowledgeable and available, often resolving issues quickly. However, some recent feedback indicates system outages and stability concerns that complicate support interactions.
Shiji Astral Payments, lacking review data, makes it difficult to assess support quality. Given its global scale, it likely offers 24/7 support; yet, without user feedback, hotel teams should proceed cautiously, especially during initial implementation. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments integrates with 56 verified partners, including major vendors like Sage, GuestCentric, and Revinate. Its integrations focus on PMS, revenue management, and distribution channels, enabling a cohesive workflow for many North American hotels.
Shiji Astral Payments supports 64 verified partners, including popular systems like Oaky, Adyen, and SALTO. Its broader partner network reflects its aim to serve international markets with diverse needs. Both systems are well-connected, but Shiji’s wider partner ecosystem offers slightly more flexibility for varied hotel operations. Edge: Shiji Astral Payments.
roommaster Payments has accumulated 20 reviews in the last six months, with a high overall rating of 4.45/5 and an NPS score of 8.4/10, indicating strong recent satisfaction. Hoteliers in North America rate it highly for support and ease of use, despite some concerns about stability.
Shiji Astral Payments has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Its international footprint and feature set are promising, but without recent feedback, hoteliers should approach cautiously. Therefore, edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments is priced at a flat $300 monthly fee, with no free trial or tiered pricing structures publicly available. Its cost is straightforward, but some users feel it is high given recent stability issues.
Shiji Astral Payments charges a base price of $200 per month, with no trial info provided. Its pricing suggests a more flexible or scalable model, likely reflecting its extensive features. Without detailed rates, your team should request customized quotes based on your hotel’s transaction volume and regional needs.
Not ideal if your hotel operates across multiple countries or needs a wide array of payment methods, as the platform’s international features are limited.
Not ideal if your hotel operates solely within North America with simple payment processing needs, as the platform’s extensive features may be unnecessary and more complex.
In essence, the core difference lies in the focus: roommaster Payments offers a reliable, North America-centric payment solution with high support ratings, while Shiji Astral Payments provides a versatile, globally oriented platform with extensive payment method options.
Choose roommaster Payments if your hotel values proven support, ease of use, and seamless PMS integration within North America, especially if stability is your priority. Opt for Shiji Astral Payments if your hotel operates internationally, needs multiple currencies, and wants a broad array of payment options—despite the lack of recent user reviews.
If your hotel prioritizes regional stability and support, roommaster Payments should be your go-to. However, if your operation demands flexibility, currency support, and global scalability, Shiji Astral Payments might be the better long-term investment.
In conclusion:
Your decision should reflect your operational landscape, regional needs, and support expectations.
Prijzen voor Software voor betalingsverwerking zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $200/mo |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen roommaster Payments en Shiji Astral Payments 13 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepteert AliPay | ||
| Accepteert American Express | ||
| Accepteert Mastercard | ||
| Accepteert Paypal | ||
| Betalingen in meerdere valuta's | ||
| Dynamische valutaconversie (DCC) |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 3 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 3 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Having a single PMS across our properties has allowed us to standardize operations while maintaining flexibility for individual hotel needs. This has significantly simplified train..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. roommaster Payments en Shiji Astral Payments delen veel kern-Payments Processing Software-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. roommaster Payments biedt 56 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Shiji Astral Payments er 64 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. roommaster Payments scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.2/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
roommaster Payments: Nee. Shiji Astral Payments: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Payments Processing Software-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. roommaster heeft een HT Score van 0 en Shiji Group heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen