The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 371 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Agilysys Hospitality Solutions 表现出色 在 用户友好型设计 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 371 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 43 | 328 |
在分析了 371 条经验证的评价后,Agilysys Hospitality Solutions 用户最看重其 用户友好型设计, 全面的功能, 定制和解决方案,而 Clock 用户则强调 ease of use and intuitive design, 预订和客房管理, 集成与自动化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好型设计
▾
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Design
▾
|
|
+
全面的功能
▾
|
+
预订和客房管理
▾
|
|
+
定制和解决方案
▾
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
|
+
培训支持
▾
|
+
培训和入职
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
发展和支持问题
▾
|
−
功能更新和可用性
▾
|
|
−
System Integration
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
成本效益
▾
|
−
连接性和同步性
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #54 2 条评价 | #11 117 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #41 9 条评价 | #7 157 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #25 4 条评价 | #17 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #6 11 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #45 9 条评价 | #8 165 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #29 13 条评价 | #11 80 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #48 3 条评价 | #8 62 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #9 27 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #21 24 条评价 | #17 30 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 228 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #27 1 条评价 | #11 13 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #17 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and overall profitability. Agilysys PMS by Agilysys Hospitality Solutions and Clock PMS by Clock are both established players in this space, each claiming to streamline hotel management. While both aim to improve your team’s workflow, they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market focus. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both products promise to cover core PMS functions like reservations, guest profiles, invoicing, and front desk operations. However, Agilysys emphasizes its deep integration within the hospitality ecosystem, while Clock promotes its all-in-one, cloud-based approach designed for busy-day management. So, which system offers the right fit to help your hotel thrive?
Agilysys PMS is designed to serve complex hotel environments, particularly resorts, casinos, and larger properties, with a focus on extensive integration and detailed guest profiles. Its platform is built on a solid reputation, with a track record spanning over 60 years, but it has fewer reviews overall—42, with only 12 recent ones in the last six months.
In contrast, Clock PMS boasts a significantly higher review count—251 reviews, with only 6 in the past six months—making its recent feedback more relevant and reliable. It scores higher in user ratings, with a 4.8/5 overall and a 84/100 on the HotelTechReport (HTR) Score, compared to Agilysys’s 3.22/5 and 73.2/100, respectively. Support and onboarding are notably better for Clock, with ratings of 4.75/5 and 4.71/5, versus Agilysys’s 3.92/5 and 3.69/5.
Both systems address core hotel management needs, but Clock’s more recent and more numerous reviews suggest it provides a more current and user-validated experience. Given the trend, Clock’s superior ratings and review volume make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today.
If your hotel operates at a high volume, requires frequent updates, and values ease of onboarding and support, Clock PMS is likely the better fit. Its extensive feature set—including online check-in, guest portals, automated payments, and real-time synchronization—caters well to dynamic environments like city hotels, hostels, and B&Bs.
On the other hand, if your hotel is a luxury resort, casino, or a property with complex integrations and a need for highly customized solutions, Agilysys may serve you better. Its robust system handles large-scale operations and complex guest profiles, but it’s less favored for ease of use and recent updates.
For properties seeking quick deployment, high responsiveness, and a modern interface, Clock’s focus on user experience and ongoing development make it the clear choice. Conversely, Agilysys suits properties that prioritize extensive integration and tailored solutions over simplicity.
Clock PMS receives a higher ease-of-use rating—4.78/5 compared to Agilysys’s 4.36/5—reflecting its modern, intuitive interface and streamlined workflows. Users praise Clock’s simple onboarding, quick staff training, and clear navigation, with many reviews highlighting how new employees pick it up easily.
Agilysys, while considered user-friendly, has a more complex setup with a larger number of buttons and sub-menus, leading to a steeper learning curve. Some users mention that Agilysys’s interface can be overwhelming initially, especially for seasonal staff or smaller teams.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Agilysys offers a total of 52 shared features with Clock but includes 2 exclusive functionalities: SMS guest communication and mobile notes & tasks. These focus on guest engagement and staff mobility, which are vital for full-service properties.
Clock, however, provides an additional 6 unique features, including EPoS, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, gift vouchers, and a cloud-based platform. Its extensive set of integrations, online check-in, guest portals, and automation tools are particularly valuable for mid-sized and smaller hotels aiming for modern, guest-centric operations.
Overall, Clock’s broader feature set and flexibility give it the edge in operational versatility.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS consistently receives higher support ratings—4.75/5—thanks to its proactive, responsive team, and a reputation for rapid problem resolution. Users highlight its ongoing updates and attentive customer service as major strengths.
Agilysys’s support scores lower at 3.92/5, with reviews mentioning slower responses and some frustration over delays in feature enhancements. While Agilysys offers dedicated solutions for large properties, its support responsiveness lags behind Clock’s.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s overall score of 84/100 and a 95% likelihood to recommend reflect its recent popularity among hoteliers, especially in boutique, city, and B&B segments. Its reviews emphasize ease of use, speed, and support, particularly from independent and boutique properties.
Agilysys’s lower ratings—73/100 on the HTR Score and a 79% recommendation—are based on fewer reviews and older feedback, with some users citing system crashes and limited support responsiveness.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Agilysys PMS charges a base price of $1,000, with no free trial or transparent monthly or per-room fees. Its pricing structure suggests it might be more suitable for larger properties with complex needs and budgets for implementation.
Clock PMS costs $600 upfront, with no ongoing connection fees or hidden charges. Its transparent, lower entry price makes it appealing for a wide range of hotel sizes, especially smaller properties seeking affordability and ease of setup.
Not ideal if you seek quick deployment, modern UI, or high responsiveness from support.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on complex, highly customized solutions or operates in a very niche, luxury segment requiring specialized systems.
At its core, Agilysys offers a comprehensive, large-scale PMS designed for properties with complex operational needs. Its strengths lie in deep integrations, detailed guest profiles, and tailored solutions, making it ideal for resorts and casinos.
Clock PMS, by contrast, is a modern, cloud-based system that excels in ease of use, rapid deployment, and ongoing support. Its extensive feature set, competitive pricing, and highly positive recent reviews make it the preferred choice for most small to medium-sized hotels.
Choose Agilysys if your property requires extensive customization, scalability, and integration with specialized systems. Opt for Clock if you need a straightforward, reliable platform that enhances operational efficiency and guest experience with minimal fuss.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $600/mo |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统用户友好,易于操作,这对于季节性员工的酒店来说至关重要,因为它可以减少培训时间。这对于快速员工入职至关重要。
该产品提供一系列功能,包括处理完整的客人旅程和前台、水疗、销售等服务的各种模块,所有这些都来自单一供应商。
该公司以根据具体业务挑战定制解决方案并积极响应客户反馈而闻名。定制解决方案可满足独特的房地产需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到,增强功能请求延迟,支持响应速度变慢,影响了服务质量。客户期望更快的沟通和更新。
Agilysys Versa is praised for seamlessly integrating various systems, which improves operational efficiency. This integration covers F&B, Sales, PMS,... Agilysys Versa is praised for seamlessly integrating various systems, which improves operational efficiency. This integration covers F&B, Sales, PMS, and more, helping streamline operations.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees... Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees and enhances operational efficiency. The software's straightforward navigation and learnability make it ideal for fast-paced environments.
评论者经常提到,Clock PMS+ 提供了高效的预订和客房管理工具。它将预订、客房管理和宾客沟通等各种运营环节整合到一个平台上,从而节省时间并减少错误。
用户非常欣赏 Clock PMS+ 的广泛集成和自动化功能,它可以与其他系统无缝连接,节省重复性任务的时间,并增强日常运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好... 一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好地适应这些更新。
一些用户指出,虽然 Clock PMS+ 提供了全面的报告,但在数据收集和呈现方式方面仍有改进的空间,这可以增强收入管理和战略规划。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Agilysys PMS 和 Clock PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Agilysys PMS 提供 23 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Clock PMS 提供 111 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Agilysys PMS:否。Clock PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Agilysys Hospitality Solutions 的 HT Score 为 72,Clock 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案