The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 1 条评价 | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #29 2 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #30 2 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #25 3 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #26 0 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #21 3 条评价 | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Alliants Guest App and STAY Guest App hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational goals, and guest experience priorities. Both platforms aim to enhance guest engagement and streamline hotel processes, but they diverge in features, user feedback, and market presence. While Alliants offers a highly rated, intuitive platform with extensive communication channels, STAY emphasizes operational efficiency, integration, and a broad hotel chain user base. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s vision?
Both Alliants and STAY focus on elevating guest experiences through digital tools, but they approach this goal differently. Alliants emphasizes personalized, multilingual communication, contactless check-in/out, and request management, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing guest interaction. Conversely, STAY concentrates on operational digitization—reducing queues, automating services, and integrating with existing hotel systems—favoring hotels seeking efficiency. Do you need a guest-centered app or an operational powerhouse?
Alliants’s recent reviews showcase a perfect 5/5 rating backed by only 3 reviews, mostly praising its communication channels and customization. In contrast, STAY’s 3/5 rating from over 200 reviews indicates mixed sentiment, especially around support and reporting. The more recent and numerous reviews favor STAY, making it the more reliable choice for current hotel standards. Which platform seems more aligned with your hotel’s priorities?
If your hotel needs a guest app that unifies communication, offers multilingual support, and enhances guest engagement, Alliants is the clear choice. Its high overall rating and recent reviews affirm its value for hotels emphasizing guest interaction, especially those in city centers or with diverse international guests.
However, if your hotel seeks to streamline operations, reduce front desk queues, and integrate deeply with your existing systems, STAY’s focus on operational efficiency makes it more suitable. Its broad hotel chain adoption and proven results in reducing wait times and increasing revenue suggest it’s better for hotels prioritizing internal process improvements.
In summary:
Choose Alliants if enhancing guest communication and personalization is your focus. Opt for STAY if boosting operational efficiency and integration are your top goals.
Alliants scores a 4.67/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Users find it straightforward to manage guest interactions and requests, with some feedback suggesting minor room for customization improvements.
STAY edges slightly ahead with a 4.78/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing its user-friendly CMS and simple implementation. Hotel staff report quick adoption and minimal learning curve, though some mention limited support hours.
Edge: STAY.
Alliants offers a robust suite of 10 unique features, including a smart vendor database, package management, mobile check-in, and a comprehensive request system. It also provides contactless check-in/out with mobile keys, multilingual communication, and payment options—features that STAY lacks.
STAY provides 4 exclusive features, notably its chatbot, automated replies, message routing, and a mobile app tailored for operational automation. While slightly fewer in number, these features focus on streamlining staff workflows rather than guest communication.
Edge: Alliants.
Alliants’s reviews commend its high support ratings, with a perfect 5/5 score and explicit praise for technical support and personalized engagement. Customers note the team’s proactive communication and operational understanding, enhancing trust.
STAY’s support is rated 4.83/5, with users appreciating responsiveness but citing some limitations in live support hours and slower reporting updates. While support is generally strong, Alliants’s recent reviews suggest a slightly more attentive and recent support experience.
Edge: Alliants.
STAY boasts 20 verified integrations, including major PMS and CRM systems like Hotelkit, SiteMinder, Mews, and Onity, providing broader connectivity. Alliants offers 13 verified partners, including key players like Oracle Hospitality, Nevaya, and Adyen, but fewer options overall.
Both platforms share six common partners, but STAY’s larger integration network makes it more adaptable to diverse hotel tech stacks. For hotels with complex systems, STAY’s extensive partner list provides a distinct advantage.
Edge: STAY.
Alliants’s reviews are limited, but the three recent reviews give it a perfect 5/5 score, indicating high satisfaction among early adopters in city center hotels. The lack of recent reviews limits broader insight.
STAY, with over 200 reviews and a 3/5 rating, reflects mixed experiences, especially around support and reporting. Nonetheless, its large user base and recent reviews suggest it’s more reflective of current hotel needs.
Edge: Alliants.
Alliants’s pricing begins at $200/month, with no freemium options, implementation fees, or trial periods, making it straightforward but potentially less flexible for smaller hotels.
STAY’s starting price is $300/month, also without freemium or setup fees, positioning it as a premium solution aligned with its broader operational features.
Both platforms are subscription-based, with no free trials, so your decision may depend on budget and value perception.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Alliants offers a highly rated, guest-centric app with extensive communication features, suited for hotels that focus on personalized guest engagement and multilingual support. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction ratings make it a reliable choice for properties emphasizing guest interaction and branding.
STAY shines in operational efficiency, providing a broad set of integrations and proven results in reducing queues and increasing revenue. Its larger hotel chain adoption and recent feedback make it the better choice for hotels prioritizing internal process improvements.
If your hotel’s main goal is to foster guest loyalty through communication and personalization, Alliants is the way to go. If streamlining operations and integrating with existing hotel systems is your priority, STAY is the smarter option. Ultimately, your decision should hinge on whether guest experience or operational efficiency drives your strategic focus.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Alliants Guest App 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Alliants Guest App 提供 13 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Alliants Guest App:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。alliants 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案