The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and GraceSoft’s Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s priorities. Both aim to boost direct bookings, but they do so through different approaches—Amadeus offers an extensive, feature-rich platform with strong market presence, while GraceSoft emphasizes simplicity and ease of setup. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, market focus, and the importance you place on features versus user experience.
Amadeus’s booking engine is backed by a broader ecosystem, boasting more recent reviews and a larger user base, giving it a clear advantage in reliability and ongoing support. The question remains: which system fits your hotel’s specific needs better?
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine addresses complex needs with a comprehensive suite of features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual capabilities, and integrations with advanced marketing tools. Its broad regional presence and over 90 reviews in the last six months demonstrate ongoing engagement and development. GraceSoft, on the other hand, remains a smaller player with no recent reviews, which raises concerns about support and innovation.
While Amadeus is favored for its extensive feature set and market penetration, GraceSoft appears more suitable for hotels seeking a straightforward, budget-friendly solution. However, the lack of recent feedback on GraceSoft limits insight into its current performance. Given the recent activity and larger review base, Amadeus clearly holds a stronger position for hotels seeking proven reliability.
If your hotel needs a full-featured booking engine integrated into a broader revenue management and marketing ecosystem, go with Amadeus. Its robust functionality, including automated reporting, rate management, and multi-channel distribution, makes it ideal for mid-to-large hotels or chains aiming to optimize direct revenue.
If your hotel is smaller or just getting started with online bookings, and you prioritize ease of use over advanced features, GraceSoft might seem appealing. However, the absence of recent reviews and a limited integrations count suggest it may not keep pace with evolving industry demands. For most hotels actively seeking growth, Amadeus offers a more dependable, scalable choice.
Amadeus’s platform scores a solid 4.25/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface once users are familiar with its complexity. Onboarding is rated at 4.01/5, reflecting a generally smooth setup process, though some users note a learning curve due to the platform’s extensive features. Customer support ratings are moderate (3.22/5), indicating room for improvement in responsiveness.
GraceSoft, with no recent reviews, does not have publicly available usability ratings, making it difficult to judge its user-friendliness. Its smaller scale suggests a simpler interface, but without current data, confidence in its ease of use remains uncertain. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 36 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, automated reporting, multi-currency/language support, loyalty integrations, and several payment options like Apple Pay and Google Pay. These capabilities support complex marketing, upselling, and revenue strategies.
GraceSoft provides a straightforward booking and reservation management tool but lacks the extensive feature list of Amadeus. Its smaller set of features limits customization and advanced marketing options. The clear edge goes to Amadeus for feature depth and flexibility.
Amadeus’s customer support receives mixed reviews, with a score of 3.22/5. Some users report attentive service, while others find responses slow or inconsistent. Given its size and complexity, ongoing support can be variable, which is typical for large enterprise solutions.
GraceSoft lacks recent review data, leaving support quality uncertain. Its smaller scale might imply more personalized assistance, but this remains unverified. For reliability and tracked support quality, Amadeus’s established presence gives it an advantage. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus integrates with 107 verified partners, including notable systems like Priority Software, Orange Hotel Marketing, and RevControl. It supports a wide array of third-party systems, facilitating seamless connections with PMS, GDS, CRM, and marketing tools.
GraceSoft’s integration count is just one verified partner, limiting its connectivity options. This restricts scalability and integration with other systems a busy hotel might rely on. For a scalable, integrated environment, Amadeus clearly leads. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s hotel reviews indicate a high overall rating of 4.39/5, with independent hotels rating it 4.36/5 and boutique/hotel chains giving it 4.5-4.61/5. Recent reviews praise its revenue-driving features and ease of management, though some mention support delays.
There are no recent reviews for GraceSoft, making it impossible to gauge current hotel sentiment. Given the available data, Amadeus enjoys stronger ratings from properties of all sizes. Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for both solutions are not publicly disclosed, which is typical for enterprise software. Amadeus’s pricing is likely based on custom packages, considering its scale and feature set, while GraceSoft probably offers more straightforward or tiered pricing.
Without specific numbers, your best approach is to contact vendors directly for quotes aligned with your hotel’s size and needs.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, low-cost booking engine without extensive feature requirements or if your hotel operates primarily domestically with minimal technical support.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced features, extensive integrations, or plans to scale significantly.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine stands out with its extensive feature set, broad market presence, and high hotel ratings, especially given its recent review activity. Its capabilities support complex revenue strategies, internationalization, and system integrations, making it suitable for mid-to-large hotels and chains.
GraceSoft, while potentially easier for small properties or those new to online bookings, lacks recent reviews and a broad feature set, limiting its appeal for hotels with growth ambitions or complex needs. Its simpler platform might suit very small hotels or vacation rentals without extensive technical requirements.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel seeks a proven, scalable solution with a comprehensive feature list and international support. If your hotel prioritizes ease and simplicity over advanced capabilities, GraceSoft might suffice—but proceed cautiously given the limited recent feedback.
In conclusion, for most hotels actively looking to grow and optimize their direct booking channels, Amadeus remains the more reliable and feature-rich choice, backed by recent reviews and widespread use.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Gracesoft Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 107 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Gracesoft Booking Engine 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Gracesoft Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 71,GraceSoft 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案