The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 178 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Form autofill and Flexible dates.
roommaster 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Pooled inventory and Gift Vouchers.
基于 HTR 上 178 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 95 | 83 |
在分析了 178 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 增加收入, 客户服务,而 roommaster 用户则强调 用户友好型设计, 安全自动交易, 用于网络预订的ai聊天机器人。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
用户友好型设计
▾
|
|
+
增加收入
▾
|
+
安全自动交易
▾
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
用于网络预订的AI聊天机器人
▾
|
|
+
高级报告和分析
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
−
手续费
▾
|
|
−
复杂性和可用性问题
▾
|
|
|
−
功能实现滞后
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | #16 29 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #14 33 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | #21 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #26 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | #16 33 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | #20 14 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #22 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #4 61 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | #32 3 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | #24 0 条评价 |
You're evaluating two hotel booking engines: Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and roommaster booking engine. Both are designed to convert website visitors into direct bookings, yet they approach this goal differently. Amadeus’s iHotelier is more established in global markets with deeper integration options, while roommaster emphasizes ease of use and customization for small to medium hotels. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operational needs and growth plans?
Both products aim to improve your direct booking rate and revenue, but their strengths and weaknesses vary. The key question is whether you prioritize a platform with a larger market presence and more advanced features or one with a more affordable, user-friendly interface.
Amadeus’s iHotelier offers a broader feature set, with 36 features compared to roommaster’s 27, including integrations like Google Hotel Ads, Tripadvisor Bookings, and multiple online payment options. It is also used by a diverse range of hotel types, from luxury resorts to city center hotels, with a significant presence in Europe, Asia Pacific, and North America.
In contrast, roommaster focuses on simplicity and affordability, with a user base primarily in North America. Its 56 verified partners include small hotels and motels, and it’s praised for quick onboarding and straightforward management. However, customers report that support can sometimes lag, especially when resolving issues.
The choice hinges on your hotel’s size, geographical focus, and feature requirements. Do you need a highly scalable, global solution with extensive integrations, or a straightforward, budget-conscious system that’s easy to implement and manage?
If your hotel needs a mature platform with proven global reach, advanced integrations, and robust analytics, go with Amadeus. Its extensive partner network and market presence make it ideal for large or multi-property hotels looking to boost direct bookings and leverage market intelligence tools.
If your hotel values an easy-to-use interface, quick deployment, and a lower price point, roommaster is the better pick. It suits smaller hotels or properties preferring a customizable system that emphasizes operational simplicity and direct channel growth without the complexity of larger systems.
For hotels with a focus on sophisticated marketing and multi-channel distribution, Amadeus provides richer features. Conversely, if your team prioritizes ease of use and immediate results, roommaster offers a more straightforward experience.
Roommaster scores higher on ease of use, with a 4.43/5 rating versus Amadeus’s 4.25/5, and reviews highlight its straightforward, intuitive interface. Customers report that staff can quickly learn and adapt without extensive training, contributing to faster implementation.
Amadeus’s platform, while feature-rich, is often described as more complex, with some users noting a steeper learning curve. Its onboarding process is rated slightly lower at 4.01/5, and support responsiveness can vary, impacting staff adoption.
Edge: roommaster.
Amadeus boasts 36 features, including unique options like Google Hotel Ads Bookings, Tripadvisor Bookings, Apple Pay, and flexible date management, providing a comprehensive booking solution. It also offers form autofill, availability blocks, and promotional tools aimed at increasing conversions.
Roommaster offers 27 features, with notable capabilities like pooled inventory, gift vouchers, social media integration, room substitutions, and meal plans, which are absent in Amadeus. Its built-in upselling tools and real-time pricing sync support direct revenue growth.
The decision depends on your hotel’s need for specific features. For extensive online marketing and flexible payment options, Amadeus has an edge; for personalized guest experiences and upselling, roommaster shines.
Edge: Amadeus.
Roommaster’s support ratings are significantly higher, with a 4.16/5 overall compared to Amadeus’s 3.22/5. Customers praise roommaster’s quick, helpful responses and ease of troubleshooting, which enhances user confidence.
Amadeus’s support receives mixed reviews. While some users appreciate the dedicated account managers, many cite delayed responses and difficulty resolving issues promptly. This inconsistency can hinder smooth adoption for your team.
Edge: roommaster.
Amadeus has verified partnerships with 104 providers, nearly double roommaster’s 56, including key integrations with site management, analytics, and global distribution channels like SiteMinder and RevControl. Its extensive network supports complex, multi-channel distribution.
Roommaster’s integrations are fewer, with shared partners like GuestRevu and TrustYou, but it lacks many of the advanced marketing and analytics integrations found in Amadeus. Its focus is on core PMS and booking engine systems.
If extensive third-party integrations are critical to your operations, Amadeus offers a clear advantage. For simpler, streamlined connections, roommaster is sufficient.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating is 4.39/5, with 93 reviews, mostly from independent and boutique hotels. Its recent reviews, however, are scarce, limiting current data.
Roommaster holds a slightly lower overall rating of 4.31/5, based on 70 reviews, mainly from small hotels and motels. Recent reviews indicate strong satisfaction with support and ease of use.
Given the greater number of reviews and recent feedback, Amadeus’s higher rating reflects its broader adoption and more recent performance.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus does not publish specific pricing details, but its model typically involves a custom quote based on property size and needs. It’s often considered a premium solution with higher implementation costs.
roommaster charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no additional implementation or trial fees. Its transparent pricing makes it accessible for small to medium hotels seeking predictable expenses.
Your decision may involve weighing the value of extensive features, integrations, and global presence versus straightforward, predictable costs.
Amadeus suits hotels aiming for scalability and a comprehensive digital strategy, especially in competitive markets.
roommaster works well for those prioritizing ease of use and immediate revenue gains without complexity.
Amadeus – iHotelier® is a highly capable booking engine that excels in global reach, extensive integrations, and advanced marketing features. Its depth makes it ideal for larger, multi-property, or international hotels driven by data and revenue optimization.
roommaster offers a simplified, budget-friendly alternative with a strong focus on ease of use, quick deployment, and core functionalities. It’s perfect for small to mid-sized hotels that want to boost direct bookings without the complexity of larger systems.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform with global support. Opt for roommaster if your priority is operational simplicity, affordability, and rapid results.
In conclusion, your decision should balance your hotel’s size, growth ambitions, and specific feature needs. Both platforms can help you increase direct bookings, but aligning their strengths with your goals is key.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 roommaster booking engine 共享 27 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Google Pay | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| 表单自动填充 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该预订引擎的界面因其简洁性而备受赞誉,酒店员工能够高效地学习和使用系统。直观的布局提升了整体用户体验,有助于提高用户接受度和满意度。
安全交易是其核心优势之一,可确保预订流程顺畅无阻,并保障客户数据安全。此功能最大限度地减少了对第三方预订平台的依赖,从而增加了直接收入来源。
人们对将人工智能聊天功能集成到预订引擎中抱有乐观预期。这项功能有望通过在预订过程中提供即时、智能的互动来提升宾客体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然交易的自动化安全性值得赞赏,但处理费用带来的成本问题也引起了用户关注。用户建议降低成本,以提升引擎的价值主张。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 roommaster booking engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster booking engine 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。roommaster booking engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。roommaster booking engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,roommaster 的为 81。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问