The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 108 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
myCloud Hospitality PMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 108 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 4 | 104 |
在分析了 108 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 ,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户友好性, 与 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
|
+
详细报告
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
|
−
系统缓慢
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #56 1 条评价 | #14 67 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #19 29 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #26 2 条评价 | #27 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #26 0 条评价 | #34 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #50 1 条评价 | #16 48 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #42 2 条评价 | #14 49 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #34 3 条评价 | #12 35 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #51 0 条评价 | #36 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #37 1 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #38 2 条评价 | #50 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #41 0 条评价 | #7 93 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical to streamlining your hotel operations, boosting revenue, and maintaining guest satisfaction. Both Amadeus Property Management by Amadeus and myCloud Hospitality PMS aim to serve this purpose, but their approaches and capabilities differ substantially. Amadeus offers a long-standing, robust solution with extensive distribution features, while myCloud provides a cloud-based, user-friendly platform with a broad range of integrations. Which product best aligns with your hotel’s needs?
Both solutions address core hotel management needs like reservations, check-ins, and operations, but their target audiences and feature sets diverge. Amadeus has a deep history in the industry, emphasizing distribution and advanced property management for mid-chain and independent hotels, yet it suffers from an outdated interface and limited recent reviews. myCloud, by comparison, boasts a modern, cloud-native platform with glowing recent reviews, highlighting its ease of use and extensive integrations. Do you need a traditional, distribution-heavy system or a more flexible, easy-to-navigate platform?
If your hotel is a mid-chain or independent property looking for strong distribution capabilities, Amadeus’s extensive distribution integrations and multi-channel reach make it a compelling choice. Conversely, if operational simplicity, modern features, and exceptional support are priorities, myCloud’s high user ratings, recent reviews, and cloud infrastructure make it the better fit. Smaller hotels and chains with limited IT resources will benefit most from myCloud’s straightforward setup and ease of use.
Amadeus’s user rating of 3.5/5 and a lack of recent reviews suggest a complex system that may require significant training. Its onboarding process scores 3.75/5, and review comments include concerns about service quality and software stability. myCloud, with a 4.79/5 ease-of-use rating and recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, garners strong support for quick staff adoption. The recent feedback highlights that myCloud’s modern design simplifies daily tasks.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
Amadeus offers only 1 exclusive feature—on-premises deployment—limiting its modern capabilities. myCloud boasts 42 unique features, including multi-currency support, integrated CRS, booking engine, guest CRM, mobile app, digital registration, contactless check-in, and real-time reporting—features highly valued by hotels seeking automation and guest engagement. The sheer breadth of features in myCloud, especially those focusing on guest experience and operational automation, clearly surpasses Amadeus.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
Amadeus’s support ratings sit at 3.63/5, with reviews citing inconsistent service and unresolved issues, such as overselling rooms and long-standing problems. MyCloud’s support scores an impressive 4.83/5, with many reviews emphasizing their responsiveness and proactive assistance. Hoteliers repeatedly mention their satisfaction with the quick, helpful responses from the myCloud team, making support a clear strength for myCloud.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
Amadeus has verified partnerships with 104 providers, including major players like Profitroom, SiteMinder, Revinate, and D-Edge, emphasizing its strength in distribution and revenue tools. myCloud offers 29 integrations, including key partners such as Sage, Vertical Booking, and STAAH, with shared integrations like SiteMinder and Revinate. While Amadeus’s larger partner network supports broader distribution, myCloud’s integrations are well-chosen for operational efficiency and guest engagement.
Edge: Amadeus Property Management.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 2.5/5 and a review count of only 4 suggest limited recent feedback, with negative comments about service quality and software stability. myCloud’s rating of 4.81/5 from 95 reviews, including recent feedback, demonstrates high satisfaction across hotel segments like boutique, resort, and branded hotels. The recent, plentiful reviews for myCloud reinforce its reputation and reliability among hoteliers.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose pricing, but historically, it has involved implementation fees and possibly custom quotes, making it less transparent. myCloud charges a fixed monthly fee of $900, offering predictable costs without hidden charges. This straightforward pricing model appeals to properties seeking clarity and simplicity in budgeting.
Not ideal if: You prefer a modern, cloud-native system with quick setup or have limited IT staff. The outdated interface and mixed support quality may hinder smaller properties or those seeking innovation.
Not ideal if: You operate large, complex properties requiring extensive distribution or on-premises solutions. Also, if you rely heavily on custom reporting or need a mobile app, you may see limitations.
Amadeus Property Management offers a long-established, distribution-focused platform suited for mid-sized or independent hotels with substantial distribution needs. Its strengths lie in extensive integrations and demand-generation features, but its outdated interface and support issues are drawbacks. myCloud Hospitality PMS provides a modern, intuitive system with high hotel ratings, excellent support, and innovative features, making it an attractive choice for smaller or digitally-savvy properties.
If your hotel values ease of use, recent positive feedback, and rapid deployment, myCloud is the clear leader. For properties needing extensive distribution channels and revenue management capabilities, Amadeus remains a solid, though less flexible, choice. Your decision should hinge on your hotel’s size, technological preferences, and operational priorities.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus Property Management 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享 17 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 31 项功能存在差异。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然这不是一个独特的功能,但出色的客户支持是一个反复出现的主题。用户一致称赞支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,强调他们在迅速解决问题方面发挥的作用。
酒店经营者一致称赞 mycloud PMS 直观且用户友好的界面。这种易用性有助于快速培训员工并顺利开展日常运营,即使没有丰富技术知识的员工也能轻松使用。
用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增... 用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增加了收入机会。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论指出,缺乏移动应用程序是一个重大缺陷。用户表示需要一款移动应用程序来随时随地管理操作,他们认为这将进一步提高系统的灵活性和可用性。
有些用户报告称,mycloud PMS 偶尔会变慢,通常将其归因于互联网连接问题。虽然基于云的特性是有益的,但这也意味着系统的性能可能会受到网络速度的影响。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus Property Management 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus Property Management 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 提供 29 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。myCloud Hospitality PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus Property Management:否。myCloud Hospitality PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,myCloud Hospitality PMS 的为 74。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问