The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 399 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and On premise.
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
基于 HTR 上 399 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 4 | 395 |
在分析了 399 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 ,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 客户支持, 运营效率, 数据和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
数据和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #56 1 条评价 | #4 145 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #9 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #26 2 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #26 0 条评价 | #5 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #50 1 条评价 | #7 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #42 2 条评价 | #7 70 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #34 3 条评价 | #7 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #51 0 条评价 | #11 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #37 1 条评价 | #1 386 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #38 2 条评价 | #57 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #41 0 条评价 | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel’s operations, guest experiences, and revenue. Both Amadeus Property Management and ThinkReservations PMS aim to streamline tasks and boost profitability, but they diverge significantly in features, user reviews, and overall market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, segment, and specific operational needs—so which platform truly fits your property?
Amadeus Property Management is a longstanding enterprise solution rooted in global distribution and large-scale hotel operations, offering a broad array of advanced features like revenue management and guest CRM. ThinkReservations, on the other hand, is tailored for small to mid-sized properties, primarily inns, B&Bs, and boutique hotels, focusing on ease of use, integrated booking, and guest communication.
Both systems aim to enhance operational efficiency, but Amadeus’s extensive integrations and distribution channels make it suitable for properties seeking global reach. Conversely, ThinkReservations emphasizes a simple, fast deployment with a strong focus on guest engagement and revenue uplift through upselling.
Despite their differences, the real deciding factor is the weight of user feedback—Amadeus’s reviews are scarce and dated, while ThinkReservations benefits from hundreds of recent, positive reviews. Are you leaning toward a proven, well-supported platform or a modern, highly-rated system?
If your hotel is a small inn, B&B, or boutique property that prioritizes simplicity, automation, and guest communication, ThinkReservations is the better choice. Its intuitive interface, strong support network, and features like booking engine, guest messaging, and automated reminders make it ideal for properties with limited staff and a focus on direct-booking profitability.
If your hotel operates at a larger scale—luxury, branded, or city-center hotels—and requires advanced distribution, revenue management, and extensive integrations, Amadeus is better suited. Its comprehensive property management capabilities are designed to handle complex workflows, although its limited recent reviews and low overall ratings suggest potential support and usability issues for smaller teams.
In sum, choose ThinkReservations for ease, support, and direct revenue tools; select Amadeus for scalability, distribution, and sophisticated management—if you can accept the current support challenges.
ThinkReservations shines in usability, with a review score of 4.82/5 and a large volume of recent reviews praising its straightforward setup and clean interface. Users frequently mention how quickly staff adopt its features, citing onboarding ratings of 4.73/5 and effortless training.
Amadeus’s ease of use scores a modest 3.5/5, with some users citing a steep learning curve and inconsistent onboarding experiences. Its fewer reviews and recent activity also indicate less current user engagement.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations offers a broader set of features, with 24 unique functionalities such as EPoS, online check-in, guest messaging, and integrated payment terminals—features critical for operational automation and guest engagement. Amadeus’s 3 exclusive features include revenue management, on-premise deployment, and guest CRM, but they cover a narrower scope.
While Amadeus’s core offerings focus on distribution and property management, ThinkReservations delivers a comprehensive suite for small properties that want to upsell, communicate, and manage operations from a single platform.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations consistently garners praise for its support, with multiple recent reviews rating it 4.82/5. Users describe the team as accessible, responsive, and attentive, often citing quick responses and helpful onboarding.
Amadeus’s customer support scores a 3.63/5, with reviews pointing to inconsistent service, especially noted in the Netherlands, and frustration over unresolved issues after six years. One review explicitly states, “Terrible service in the Netherlands,” highlighting ongoing support challenges.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Amadeus’s integration library exceeds 104 verified partners, including major OTAs, revenue tools, and marketing platforms such as TripAdvisor, Expedia, and Profitroom. ThinkReservations connects with 16 verified partners, including Airbnb, TrustYou, and Stripe, but offers fewer overall integrations.
Shared integrations include key OTAs like Expedia and Tripadvisor, but Amadeus's extensive list supports larger, more complex hotel ecosystems. If your hotel relies on numerous third-party tools, Amadeus’s extensive network offers an advantage.
Edge: Amadeus.
ThinkReservations overwhelmingly receives higher ratings, with a 4.88/5 score based on 356 reviews, mainly from small properties like B&Bs and inns. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, excellent support, and features that have directly increased revenues—up to 20-50% in upsell revenue.
Amadeus’s ratings are significantly lower at 2.5/5, with only 4 reviews, and no recent activity. The few reviews mention setup difficulties and support issues, indicating less user satisfaction.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose its pricing, but as a large enterprise solution, its model likely involves custom quotes, implementation fees, and higher ongoing costs. ThinkReservations charges a flat fee of $500 per month, with no setup or hidden fees, making it transparent and predictable.
For small to mid-sized hotels, ThinkReservations offers a cost-effective solution with clear pricing, while Amadeus’s pricing structure may be prohibitive unless your property requires extensive distribution and management capabilities.
Hotels that should consider Amadeus include:
Not ideal if:
ThinkReservations is ideal for:
Not ideal if:
Amadeus Property Management offers a comprehensive solution with a focus on distribution, revenue management, and CRM, ideal for large or international properties. However, its limited recent reviews and support issues make it less attractive for smaller hotels seeking straightforward management.
ThinkReservations excels in user satisfaction, support, and features tailored for small to medium properties, with a proven track record of increasing revenue, simplifying operations, and fostering guest engagement. Its high review scores and recent activity suggest a more reliable and modern option.
If your hotel values ease of use, support, and rapid deployment, choose ThinkReservations. For scalable distribution, complex management, and extensive integrations, Amadeus may be appropriate—but only if you’re prepared to navigate its higher costs and support gaps.
Note: This comparison is based on the latest available data, emphasizing recent reviews and user feedback. Always verify current pricing and feature availability with the vendors before making your decision.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus Property Management 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享 15 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 15 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管许多人已经认为它很优秀,但一些评论表示希望在周末提供额外支持,以便更好地处理紧急询问。
ThinkReservations 通过数字注册、夜间审计以及轻松管理预订和入住流程来帮助简化运营,使员工能够更加专注于与客人的互动。
该系统提供全面的数据和报告功能,使酒店经营者能够就定价、客人满意度和战略规划做出明智的决策。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了定价结构的问题,包括对渠道经理费用的不满以及 ThinkMessenger 等功能的高价格。
强制的两步验证对于一些用户来说是一个令人沮丧的地方,他们觉得它很麻烦并且希望降低安全设置。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus Property Management 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus Property Management 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus Property Management:否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,ThinkReservations 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问