The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 553 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 ,而 HOTELTIME 用户则强调 user interface and learning curve, 技术支援, reporting and analytics。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
移动优化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #56 1 条评价 | #5 219 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #3 238 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #26 2 条评价 | #2 46 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #26 0 条评价 | #8 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #50 1 条评价 | #5 239 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #42 2 条评价 | #3 241 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #34 3 条评价 | #4 143 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #51 0 条评价 | #4 49 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #37 1 条评价 | #52 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #2 384 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #41 0 条评价 | #5 111 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #1 21 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that balances usability, features, support, and cost. Amadeus Property Management by Amadeus and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME aim to streamline hotel operations, but they serve different segments and offer contrasting strengths. Your decision hinges on your hotel's size, complexity, and growth plans—are you looking for an all-in-one, scalable system or a highly feature-rich platform with extensive integrations?
Both products promise to improve operational efficiency, yet their market presence, reviews, and feature sets differ significantly. Which one aligns better with your current needs and future ambitions?
Amadeus Property Management (Amadeus) is a longstanding, comprehensive system designed primarily for midscale and independent hotels seeking distribution and management integration. Its interface is considered user-friendly and reliable but is limited in features compared to HotelTime, especially in automation, guest engagement, and additional modules.
HotelTime PMS (HOTELTIME) is a cloud-based, fully featured platform with a much larger user base, offering 17 shared features and 34 exclusive ones, including guest CRM, EPoS, online check-in, and digital registration. HOTELTIME’s recent reviews, numbering 27 in the last six months, demonstrate strong ongoing support and product updates, with a higher likelihood to recommend (93% versus Amadeus’s 78%). Are you prioritizing extensive features and recent support, or do you need a more straightforward system?
If your hotel needs a scalable, easy-to-manage system with a strong global presence and recent positive reviews, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. Its platform caters well to properties of all sizes, especially resorts and boutique hotels, with 27 recent reviews and a 4.83/5 overall rating, reflecting current user satisfaction.
In contrast, if your hotel primarily requires distribution and standard management functions without extensive automation, and you prefer an established vendor with deep industry roots, Amadeus might suffice. However, its low review count and lack of recent feedback make it less reliable as a current solution. For most hotels seeking modern features and active support, HotelTime is the stronger pick.
Amadeus scores a 3.5/5 for ease of use, with some users citing a learning curve due to its complex setup for certain modules. Onboarding reviews are moderate, and some users report difficulties in adapting to its interface, especially in smaller teams.
HotelTime excels with a 4.66/5 rating, praised for its intuitive design and straightforward navigation. Recent reviews describe the system as “simple and clear,” with onboarding rated 4.63/5 and staff finding it quick to learn, even for non-technical users.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers significantly more features—34 exclusive modules—compared to Amadeus’s single unique feature, on-premise deployment. HOTELTIME provides advanced functionalities like guest CRM, EPoS, online check-in, automated reminders, and integrated payment terminals, which are absent in Amadeus.
Amadeus’s core strength lies in distribution integration and property management basics, with only 17 shared features. For hotels prioritizing automation, guest engagement, and a broad tech ecosystem, HotelTime’s extensive feature set clearly surpasses Amadeus.
Edge: HotelTime.
HOTELTIME consistently receives higher support ratings—4.73/5—compared to Amadeus’s 3.63/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick responses and proactive assistance. Users praise HOTELTIME’s support team as “helpful and efficient,” especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Amadeus’s support, while rated at 3.63/5, has mixed reviews, with some clients citing slow response times and unresolved issues over several years. With more recent positive feedback, HotelTime’s support is the preferred choice for ongoing assistance.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews far exceeds Amadeus’s 2.5/5 based on only 4 reviews, with no recent feedback. The recent surge in HOTELTIME reviews, along with a 93% likelihood to recommend, indicates strong user satisfaction.
Amadeus’s reviews are sparse and mixed, with one high rating (4.5/5) and a significant low rating (0.5/5), mostly from long-time or dissatisfied clients. Given the volume and recency, HotelTime enjoys a clear reputation advantage among hoteliers.
Edge: HotelTime.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose pricing details, but it typically involves custom quotes and potential implementation fees. Its lack of a free trial or transparent pricing can be a barrier for smaller hotels or those with limited budgets.
HotelTime charges a flat monthly fee of around $600, with no implementation or hidden costs, offering straightforward budgeting for most properties. This transparent pricing, combined with recent positive reviews, makes HOTELTIME’s value proposition more accessible.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks extensive automation, mobile features, or modern integrations, given Amadeus’s limited feature set and support.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with very basic needs or prefers on-premise software with limited cloud functionality.
Amadeus Property Management primarily serves midchain and independent hotels needing distribution and core management capabilities, but its limited recent support and feature updates weaken its position. Its core advantage lies in distribution network strength and industry longevity.
HotelTime PMS is a feature-rich, cloud-based platform with a large, recent review base and high user satisfaction, making it ideal for hotels seeking automation, integrations, and ongoing support. Its extensive modules and recent growth suggest it is better equipped for modern hotel management.
If your hotel values active support, recent user reviews, and a broad feature set, HotelTime is the clear choice. For properties focused solely on distribution and basic management, Amadeus may still fit, but its limited recent feedback poses risks.
In summary, HotelTime PMS offers a more current, highly rated, and feature-rich solution suitable for most modern hoteliers. Amadeus, while established, lags behind in support, innovation, and recent user satisfaction, making it less attractive for hotels aiming to grow and innovate in today’s competitive environment.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
虽然支持团队的响应速度和乐于助人的态度值得赞赏,但一些评论指出,延长技术支持时间将进一步提升用户体验,确保随时都能获得帮助,特别是对于国际用户而言。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus Property Management 和 HotelTime PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus Property Management 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelTime PMS 提供 58 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelTime PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus Property Management:否。HotelTime PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,HOTELTIME 的为 92。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问