项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #55 0 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 7 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #42 2 条评价 | #23 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #52 1 条评价 | #22 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #45 1 条评价 | #19 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #22 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #19 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | #19 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing between Amenitiz Booking Engine and Roiback involves evaluating your hotel’s specific needs in direct booking technology. While both platforms aim to boost your direct reservations, they differ sharply in complexity, features, and market perception. Amenitiz offers a straightforward, easy-to-integrate booking tool, whereas Roiback provides a feature-rich, scalable platform with a larger user base and more recent reviews. Which aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions?
Both products solve the core problem of increasing direct bookings and reducing OTA dependency. However, Amenitiz’s focus is primarily on small and boutique hotels needing quick, simple setup, while Roiback targets mid-size to larger properties seeking comprehensive features. Which approach suits your hotel’s scale and sophistication?
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick deployment, and lower complexity, Amenitiz is appealing. Its intuitive interface, integrated channel management, and basic booking functionalities make it ideal for small, independent properties like B&Bs and boutique hotels. On the other hand, Roiback’s platform offers over 35 distinct features, including detailed analytics, loyalty integrations, and multi-lingual support, making it suitable for larger or more technically advanced hotels aiming for extensive customization and automation. Which product matches your operational capacity?
Given Amenitiz’s limited review count (only 2, with no recent feedback), confidence in its ongoing support and feature development is lower. Conversely, Roiback’s 43 reviews, including 2 in the past six months, and a 9/5 NPS score, indicate a more active, engaged user community. Are you comfortable with a less proven platform, or do you want a solution backed by recent, larger-scale feedback?
Amenitiz scores a modest 2.75/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting a simple interface designed for smaller teams. Its onboarding process lacks detailed recent feedback, and some users find the platform does not always adapt well to complex hotel structures. Roiback, by contrast, boasts a 4.49/5 rating, with reviews praising its user-friendly interface, speedy onboarding, and effective customer support. Hotels appreciate the clarity of its rate grid and the ease of managing complex rate plans. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s platform significantly outshines Amenitiz in features, offering 35 unique capabilities compared to Amenitiz’s zero exclusive features. Roiback includes functionalities like urgency messaging, special offers, booking abandonment recovery, multi-room bookings, and extensive payment options such as Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Stripe. Amenitiz’s core offering mainly centers around basic booking and synchronization, lacking advanced marketing or upselling features. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s support team receives high praise, with a 4.72/5 rating and reviews emphasizing their responsiveness, expertise, and ongoing strategic advice. Customers report that their team effectively helps with integrations, troubleshooting, and optimizing revenue strategies. Amenitiz’s support scores only 2.25/5, with reviews indicating frustration over slow responses and limited assistance. Hotels value proactive, personalized support — making Roiback the clear winner here. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback boasts 27 verified integrations, including popular channel managers, PMS systems, and marketing tools, with seamless connectivity and regular updates. Amenitiz’s smaller ecosystem includes only 5 verified partners, limiting its flexibility for hotels with complex tech stacks. While Amenitiz covers Lightspeed and CheKin, Roiback’s broader range supports hotels seeking extensive third-party integrations. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s recent reviews and high NPS score (9/10) reflect a more satisfied user base, especially among larger hotels and resorts. Hotels in the luxury, city center, and resort segments tend to give higher ratings to Roiback’s features and support, despite some technical hiccups. Amenitiz’s two reviews, both negative, offer little confidence in current user satisfaction. Given recent feedback, Roiback’s reputation is stronger. Edge: Roiback.
Amenitiz does not publicly disclose pricing, but it is generally positioned as a budget-friendly, small business solution, often with a freemium or tiered model. Roiback charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no mention of additional setup costs. Its pricing aligns with features suited for mid-sized hotels seeking comprehensive solutions. Would you prefer a transparent, predictable monthly fee or a more customized quote?
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive customization, multi-channel marketing, or detailed performance reporting.
Not ideal if you are a very small property with minimal online booking needs.
The core difference between these solutions lies in complexity and target market. Amenitiz is a basic, easy-to-implement booking engine focused on small hotels needing straightforward online reservations. Roiback offers a more extensive, customizable platform designed for hotels aiming to optimize revenue through detailed analytics and marketing tools.
Choose Amenitiz if your hotel values simplicity, quick deployment, and budget-conscious options. Opt for Roiback if your property requires a scalable, feature-rich system supported by recent positive reviews and a large user base.
For hotels with limited technical resources or smaller operations, Amenitiz can serve as an entry point. But if your hotel is poised for growth, wants advanced features, and values ongoing support, Roiback is the more reliable choice.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amenitiz Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amenitiz Booking Engine 提供 5 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 29 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amenitiz Booking Engine:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amenitiz 的 HT Score 为 0,ROIBACK 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐