The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 35 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
apaleo GmbH 表现出色 在 ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Payment Requests.
Lodgical Solution 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 35 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 5 |
在分析了 35 条经验证的评价后,apaleo GmbH 用户最看重其 频繁更新和社区参与, 定制化和灵活性, open api and integration,而 Lodgical Solution 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
频繁更新和社区参与
▾
|
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
|
−
团体和预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #42 7 条评价 | #51 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #27 19 条评价 | #55 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #41 1 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | #58 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | #52 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #40 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #30 5 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 26 条评价 | — |
When evaluating property management systems, your primary goal is to find a solution that simplifies your operations, enhances guest experiences, and fits your hotel’s specific needs. Both Apaleo Open PMS and Lodgical Solution aim to address these needs, but they do so with distinct approaches and strengths. Apaleo offers a flexible, API-first platform with a broad feature set and extensive integrations, while Lodgical emphasizes ease of use and straightforward management for a wide range of property types. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both products serve the core purpose of streamlining property management, but Apaleo’s open API architecture sets it apart. It allows your team to customize workflows, integrate third-party applications, and build a tech ecosystem tailored to your hotel’s needs. Conversely, Lodgical simplifies daily tasks with an intuitive interface designed for ease of use, especially suited for smaller properties or teams that want minimal tech hassle.
However, Apaleo’s recent reviews and high NPS score (9.69/5) reflect strong user satisfaction, especially among hotels seeking flexibility and scalability. Lodgical’s limited review count and lack of recent feedback mean less confidence in current user experiences. Given the recent data, Apaleo’s community-driven development and frequent updates make it the more reliable option for forward-looking hoteliers.
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, scalable platform capable of integrating with dozens of third-party systems, Apaleo is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set, including multi-currency support, GDPR compliance, and real-time reporting, makes it ideal for larger or multi-property groups looking for a flexible setup.
On the other hand, if your property is small to mid-sized, prioritizes straightforward operations, and values simplicity—particularly in guest communication and basic management—Lodgical might suit you better. Its features like native SMS messaging, email marketing, and an integrated booking engine are valuable for properties that want an all-in-one, easy-to-deploy system.
Apaleo’s user experience is rated at 4.9/5, with reviews praising its smooth, friendly interface and rapid onboarding process. Users highlight how easily staff can adopt the system despite its complex functionalities, thanks to its modern design and open API. However, some users note that advanced features require third-party integrations, which could introduce a learning curve.
Lodgical Solution also boasts a high ease-of-use rating at 4.8/5. Its interface is straightforward, with positive reviews emphasizing how quickly staff can master reservation handling and guest management. Its simplicity is especially appealing if your team prefers a more guided, less customizable experience.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo offers a broader array of features—16 exclusive functionalities such as automated night audits, multi-lingual support, transaction emails, and mobile apps—totaling 37 features when combined with shared capabilities. Many features, like the automated space optimization and GDPR compliance, cater to larger, multi-property groups that require advanced management tools.
Lodgical provides 8 unique features, including guest communication via SMS, native email marketing, a booking engine, and automated reminders. These are particularly useful for small hotels and independent properties seeking straightforward guest engagement tools.
While Apaleo’s feature set is more extensive, Lodgical’s core offerings focus on ease of communication and guest interaction. If your hotel needs advanced operational tools, edge: Apaleo. If simple guest-focused features suffice, edge: Lodgical.
Apaleo’s customer support is rated at 4.83/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and active community engagement. Users appreciate the platform’s frequent updates, transparent communication, and support network—critical for resolving complex integration issues.
Lodgical’s support is rated at 4.6/5, with reviewers highlighting the friendly, patient staff and helpful documentation. While its support is effective, there’s less mention of rapid response times or extensive community engagement.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo’s recent reviews and higher ratings—especially in ease of use, support, and value—indicate a stronger reputation among hotels, particularly in Europe and North America. Its 29 reviews in the last six months, with a 97% likelihood to recommend, reinforce its momentum and customer trust.
Lodgical has only 5 reviews, with no recent feedback and an 80% recommendation rate. Its limited review count and regional presence suggest less current market validation.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo’s pricing is transparent at $900 per month as a flat fee, with no mention of implementation or setup costs. Its approach caters to hotels willing to invest upfront for a flexible, scalable platform.
Lodgical’s pricing details are not publicly available, making direct comparison difficult. However, given its focus on smaller properties, it likely offers a more affordable or modular pricing structure.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with minimal tech integration needs, or prefers a simple, out-of-the-box system.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced integrations, multi-property management, or enterprise-level features.
Core Difference: Apaleo is a flexible, API-driven platform built for hotels needing customization and extensive integrations; Lodgical is a user-friendly, straightforward PMS designed for ease of use and basic management.
When to choose Apaleo: If your hotel requires a scalable, adaptable tech ecosystem, especially with multi-property management or complex workflows. Its broad feature set and recent positive reviews make it ideal for growth-oriented hotels.
When to choose Lodgical: If your property is small to mid-sized, values simplicity, and needs reliable core functionalities like guest communication and reservation handling without the complexity of extensive integrations.
Final verdict: For most hotels seeking a modern, well-supported system with ongoing updates, Apaleo’s recent reviews, higher ratings, and larger user base make it the stronger choice. Its community-driven development and extensive capabilities position it as the future-proof solution for ambitious hoteliers. Lodgical remains a solid option for properties that prioritize straightforward management and guest engagement, but its limited recent feedback and fewer features place it behind in competitive standing.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Apaleo Open PMS 和 Lodgical Solution 共享 21 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 12 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该平台致力于定期更新和社区参与,并广受好评,用户也非常重视平台对用户反馈和持续改进的关注。活跃的社区构建了一个支持网络,提升了用户体验。
用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务... 用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务。
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户重视基本的报告功能,但 Apaleo 的高级报告功能需求也十分明显。许多人发现当前的选项有限,因此不得不依赖其他工具进行更深入的分析。
Apaleo 的群组管理功能因其用户友好性而受到称赞,但一些评论指出仍有需要改进的地方,特别是在综合功能和直观性方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Apaleo Open PMS 和 Lodgical Solution 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Apaleo Open PMS 提供 120 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgical Solution 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Apaleo Open PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Apaleo Open PMS:否。Lodgical Solution:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。apaleo GmbH 的 HT Score 为 77,Lodgical Solution 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案