项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 140 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
apaleo GmbH 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping Mobile App.
myCloud Hospitality PMS 表现出色 在 客户支持与问题解决 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 140 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $900/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 110 |
在分析了 140 条经验证的评价后,apaleo GmbH 用户最看重其 频繁更新和社区参与, 定制化和灵活性, open api and integration,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 用户则强调 客户支持与问题解决, 易用性 / 直观导航, 入职培训与培训。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
频繁更新和社区参与
▾
|
+
客户支持与问题解决
▾
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
+
易用性 / 直观导航
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
入职培训与培训
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
报告和后台可见性
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
产品开发速度与移动访问差距
▾
|
|
−
团体和预订管理
▾
|
−
渠道管理器 / 预订同步
▾
|
|
−
性能与速度问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #42 7 条评价 | #14 67 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #27 19 条评价 | #19 29 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #41 1 条评价 | #27 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 3 条评价 | #34 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | #16 48 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #14 49 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #40 4 条评价 | #12 35 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | #36 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #38 2 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 26 条评价 | #50 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #7 93 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel hinges on your specific operational needs, budget, and growth plans. Both Apaleo Open PMS and myCloud Hospitality PMS aim to streamline your hotel operations, optimize revenue, and improve guest experiences, but they approach these goals differently. Apaleo is known for its open API and extensive integrations, while myCloud emphasizes ease of use, automation, and a cloud-first approach.
Your decision ultimately depends on whether you prioritize flexibility and customization or ease of implementation and automation. Which of these systems aligns better with your hotel’s future ambitions?
Both Apaleo and myCloud PMS serve the core functions of reservations, billing, and guest management, but they diverge significantly in their architecture and focus. Apaleo’s API-first platform provides an open environment that allows for extensive customization, integrating dozens of third-party tools, making it suitable for hotels that want a tailored tech ecosystem. Conversely, myCloud offers a pre-built, cloud-based solution optimized for quick deployment with many automation features, ideal for hotels seeking straightforward management.
Recent reviews suggest Apaleo’s flexibility is a major advantage for hotels with complex operational needs or those looking to build a unique tech stack. myCloud, with its rapid onboarding and simplified interface, appeals more to hotels that prefer a plug-and-play solution. Do you need a highly customizable platform or a fast, integrated setup?
If your hotel needs a flexible, integrative system that can be customized to fit specific workflows and connect with a broad range of third-party tools, go with Apaleo. Its open API and extensive partner network make it perfect for larger, tech-savvy hotels or chains aiming for a personalized and scalable tech stack.
On the other hand, if your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick deployment, and automation features that reduce manual work, choose myCloud Hospitality PMS. It is well-suited for small to medium-sized hotels that want a reliable, cloud-based solution with strong integration capabilities and detailed reporting.
In summary, for hotels looking for customization and community-driven development, Apaleo is the clear choice. For hotels seeking speed, simplicity, and automation, myCloud Hospitality PMS is the superior option.
Both platforms score highly on ease of use: Apaleo with a 4.9/5 rating, and myCloud with a 4.79/5. Apaleo’s interface is friendly, and onboarding is quick, with many users praising its minimal downtime and straightforward navigation. Reviewers note that staff can adopt Apaleo rapidly, even without extensive technical expertise, thanks to its intuitive design.
MyCloud also boasts a user-friendly interface, with many reviewers highlighting its simplicity and smooth flow, especially for front-office staff. However, some users mention that a dedicated mobile app would improve usability further. Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo offers a core set of 36 shared features plus one exclusive feature: a Housekeeping Mobile App. It excels in custom workflows, API access, and third-party integrations, with unique functionalities like its App Store ecosystem that extend its capabilities.
myCloud, however, brings a richer feature set with 23 unique functionalities including multi-currency, EPoS, revenue management, guest CRM, digital check-in, mobile keys, and integrated messaging. It provides a more comprehensive out-of-the-box solution aimed at automating numerous operational aspects.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS due to its broader feature set, especially for automation and guest experience enhancements.
Both platforms are praised for their support: Apaleo with a 4.83/5 rating and myCloud also with 4.83/5. Apaleo’s community and support team are frequently commended for responsiveness, with users sharing that they receive timely and helpful assistance.
myCloud’s support is equally regarded, with reviews emphasizing the personal attention and prompt responses from their team, especially noting the willingness to help resolve issues quickly. Given identical support ratings, the choice here may depend on your preference for community engagement versus direct support.
Edge: Tie.
Apaleo boasts a significantly larger partner network with 120 verified integrations, including top names like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Hotelkit. Its open API facilitates connections across a wide array of solutions, making it highly adaptable for complex tech ecosystems.
myCloud has 29 verified integrations, with popular partners like Booking.com, Expedia, and Salesforce. While smaller, its ecosystem covers essential tools, especially for automation and revenue management.
Edge: Apaleo due to its extensive and versatile integration library.
Apaleo has a higher overall rating at 0/5, but this appears to be an error; however, it does have 29 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its stability, community, and flexibility. The NPS score is 9.69/10, indicating strong recommendation among users.
myCloud’s ratings are higher at 4.81/5 from 95 reviews, with recent feedback praising its user-friendliness, support, and automation capabilities. It’s especially popular among independent and boutique hotels.
Given the larger review volume and more recent feedback, myCloud’s rating is more indicative of current user satisfaction. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
Both systems are priced at a flat rate of $900, with no mention of additional implementation or monthly fees. This parity simplifies budgeting, but you should consider the value and features offered at this price point.
Apaleo’s core strength lies in its open architecture, enabling extensive customization and integration, making it ideal for larger or more tech-savvy hotels. Its flexibility and community support often appeal to hotels with complex operational needs or growth plans.
myCloud excels in simplicity, automation, and out-of-the-box functionality, making it perfect for hotels that want fast deployment, ease of use, and a broad set of integrated features. Its detailed reporting and guest engagement tools support hotels focused on operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
If your hotel values a tailored, scalable solution with a developer-friendly environment, choose Apaleo. For hotels seeking a straightforward, reliable platform that automates routine tasks and offers rich features immediately, myCloud PMS is the better option.
This comparison should help you determine which PMS aligns better with your hotel’s strategic objectives, operational style, and technical capacity.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $900/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
该平台致力于定期更新和社区参与,并广受好评,用户也非常重视平台对用户反馈和持续改进的关注。活跃的社区构建了一个支持网络,提升了用户体验。
用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务... 用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务。
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然用户重视基本的报告功能,但 Apaleo 的高级报告功能需求也十分明显。许多人发现当前的选项有限,因此不得不依赖其他工具进行更深入的分析。
Apaleo 的群组管理功能因其用户友好性而受到称赞,但一些评论指出仍有需要改进的地方,特别是在综合功能和直观性方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持是评论中最强的积极因素之一,用户表示团队知识丰富、响应迅速、能够快速解决问题。多条评论提到直接协助模块、故障排除和账户支持,这降低了依赖PMS日常运... 支持是评论中最强的积极因素之一,用户表示团队知识丰富、响应迅速、能够快速解决问题。多条评论提到直接协助模块、故障排除和账户支持,这降低了依赖PMS日常运营的酒店的运营中断。
评审者一致认为MyCloud PMS易于学习和操作,简化了培训负担,即使是前台经验有限的员工也能使用。这种易用性被定位为生产力提升,因为团队可以更快、更顺畅地完... 评审者一致认为MyCloud PMS易于学习和操作,简化了培训负担,即使是前台经验有限的员工也能使用。这种易用性被定位为生产力提升,因为团队可以更快、更顺畅地完成日常任务。
该平台因快速入职和帮助酒店上线而受到称赞,这对于需要快速部署的酒店来说非常有价值。与此同时,用户希望培训能超越前台、客房服务和预订,让酒店团队能更好地... 该平台因快速入职和帮助酒店上线而受到称赞,这对于需要快速部署的酒店来说非常有价值。与此同时,用户希望培训能超越前台、客房服务和预订,让酒店团队能更好地使用配置、费率加载和报告。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一些用户希望更快地推出新功能和改进,建议产品可以通过更快的开发周期变得更具竞争力。其他用户指出缺乏移动应用或移动友好访问,这限制了需要在大屏幕之外进行... 一些用户希望更快地推出新功能和改进,建议产品可以通过更快的开发周期变得更具竞争力。其他用户指出缺乏移动应用或移动友好访问,这限制了需要在大屏幕之外进行操作的员工的可用性。
一个经常提及的运营优势是预订渠道、渠道管理器与PMS之间的顺畅同步,这有助于减少手动工作并支持更快的预订处理。主要的缺点是偶尔会出现同步失败,尽管评论者... 一个经常提及的运营优势是预订渠道、渠道管理器与PMS之间的顺畅同步,这有助于减少手动工作并支持更快的预订处理。主要的缺点是偶尔会出现同步失败,尽管评论者指出这些问题通常会被支持团队迅速解决。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Apaleo Open PMS 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Apaleo Open PMS 提供 122 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 提供 29 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Apaleo Open PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Apaleo Open PMS:否。myCloud Hospitality PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。apaleo GmbH 的 HT Score 为 75,myCloud Hospitality PMS 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐