The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 435 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and intuitive design 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping Mobile App.
myCloud Hospitality PMS 表现出色 在 支持团队 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 435 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 328 | 107 |
在分析了 435 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and intuitive design, 预订和客房管理, 集成与自动化,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户友好性, 与 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Design
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
预订和客房管理
▾
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
+
培训和入职
▾
|
+
详细报告
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能更新和可用性
▾
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
系统缓慢
▾
|
|
−
连接性和同步性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #14 67 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #19 29 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #27 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #34 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #16 48 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #14 49 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #12 35 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #36 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #50 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #7 93 条评价 |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Clock PMS and myCloud Hospitality PMS boils down to your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth plans. Clock PMS offers an extensive suite of features designed for busy-day, high-volume hotels, while myCloud caters more to small and medium-sized properties seeking streamlined operations and integrations. Both systems aim to improve efficiency, but their core strengths diverge significantly.
Clock PMS has accumulated more reviews—251 in total, with recent feedback from the last six months—making its user experience more current and validated. myCloud, with only 95 reviews and fewer recent comments, has a smaller but still positive user base. Is your priority a well-established, feature-rich system with extensive support, or a more flexible, cloud-based platform tailored for smaller hotels?
Both Clock PMS and myCloud Hospitality PMS solve core hotel management problems: reservations, front desk operations, invoicing, and OTA synchronization. Clock’s broader feature set and extensive integrations give it an edge when managing complex, multi-property, or high-volume operations. myCloud, with its focus on automation and cloud accessibility, suits hotels prioritizing simplicity and real-time data access.
Clock’s all-in-one platform includes advanced modules like event management, restaurant POS, and activity bookings, making it ideal for hotels that run multiple revenue streams. myCloud emphasizes seamless integration with OTAs, digital check-in, and contactless features—perfect for small to mid-sized properties aiming to modernize guest experiences. Do you need a comprehensive system capable of handling diverse services, or a straightforward platform that streamlines core functions?
If your hotel needs a robust, multi-functional system with extensive customization and a strong regional presence, Clock PMS is the better pick. Its higher review count and recent positive feedback suggest it’s trusted by a wide array of operators. For hotels focused on automation, cloud access, and integrations with popular third-party tools, myCloud is a compelling alternative, especially given its ease of use and detailed reports.
Hotels with larger portfolios or complex operational requirements will benefit more from Clock’s broad feature set and deeper integrations. Smaller or newer hotels seeking quick setup, mobile-friendly features, and simplicity should lean toward myCloud. Which profile best matches your hotel’s growth stage and operational complexity?
Clock PMS scores slightly higher in user-friendliness with a 4.78/5 rating versus myCloud’s 4.79/5, but the difference is negligible. Clock’s onboarding score (4.71/5) indicates a straightforward setup process, with reviews praising its intuitive interface that simplifies training. Users also highlight Clock’s rapid responsiveness and proactive support.
myCloud’s interface is similarly rated highly, with users emphasizing its user-friendliness and quick learning curve. The absence of a mobile app, however, is a notable drawback for myCloud, which some users find limits on-the-go management. Edge: Clock.
Clock PMS offers 56 shared features, plus two unique modules—housekeeping mobile app and shift planning—designed for operational flexibility. Its features support event management, activity bookings, and restaurant POS, vital for complex properties. myCloud, with three exclusive features—guest CRM, SMS communication, and voice-to-text notes—focuses on guest engagement and automation.
Clock’s extensive feature set makes it more suitable for properties with diverse needs, while myCloud excels in streamlining guest communication and digital management. For a hotel with multiple services and operational complexity, Clock is the clear leader. For smaller hotels emphasizing guest interaction, myCloud’s features are advantageous. Which feature set aligns with your hotel’s priorities?
Edge: Clock.
Clock PMS maintains a 4.75/5 support rating, with reviews praising its timely help and regular updates. Hoteliers note that “the support team responds quickly and effectively,” contributing to smoother daily operations. However, some mention that occasional error messages are cryptic and could benefit from clearer troubleshooting guidance.
myCloud Hospitality PMS edges out slightly with a 4.83/5 rating, with reviewers emphasizing their satisfaction with support responsiveness and proactive assistance. One user notes, “The support team is always available and helpful,” which enhances confidence during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Edge: myCloud.
Clock PMS has a higher overall rating of 4.8/5, based on 251 reviews, compared to myCloud’s 4.81/5 from 95 reviews. Recent reviews (last 6 months) favor Clock, indicating current active user satisfaction. Independent hotels and boutique properties particularly praise Clock’s ease of use and comprehensive features.
myCloud’s user base, mainly small hotels and resorts, appreciates its simplicity and integration capabilities. Given the higher review count and more recent feedback, Clock’s reputation and rating are more reliable indicators of ongoing customer satisfaction.
Edge: Clock.
Clock’s pricing starts at $600, with no mention of additional or hidden fees, making it straightforward. myCloud charges $900, also with no visible setup or recurring fees, but the higher price might reflect its cloud-based infrastructure and integration capabilities.
Neither system offers a free trial, so consider your budget and the value of features when deciding. Clock’s lower cost combined with more reviews suggests it may provide better value for larger or more complex hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Clock PMS is a well-established, feature-rich platform designed for hotels with complex operations and multiple revenue streams. Its extensive integrations, ongoing updates, and robust support make it ideal for larger or multi-property hotels seeking comprehensive management.
myCloud Hospitality PMS, with its focus on automation, cloud access, and ease of use, suits small to medium hotels aiming for efficiency and modern guest experiences. Its lower price point and simplicity appeal to properties that want quick, reliable management without heavy customization.
If your property demands a versatile, scalable system with in-depth features, Clock PMS is the clear choice. If you need an intuitive, cloud-first platform focused on automation and ease, then myCloud Hospitality PMS fits better.
In conclusion, for hotels prioritizing extensive functionality and proven reliability, Clock is the recommended solution. For those valuing straightforward operation and digital guest engagement, myCloud offers a compelling alternative.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees... Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees and enhances operational efficiency. The software's straightforward navigation and learnability make it ideal for fast-paced environments.
评论者经常提到,Clock PMS+ 提供了高效的预订和客房管理工具。它将预订、客房管理和宾客沟通等各种运营环节整合到一个平台上,从而节省时间并减少错误。
用户非常欣赏 Clock PMS+ 的广泛集成和自动化功能,它可以与其他系统无缝连接,节省重复性任务的时间,并增强日常运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好... 一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好地适应这些更新。
一些用户指出,虽然 Clock PMS+ 提供了全面的报告,但在数据收集和呈现方式方面仍有改进的空间,这可以增强收入管理和战略规划。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然这不是一个独特的功能,但出色的客户支持是一个反复出现的主题。用户一致称赞支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,强调他们在迅速解决问题方面发挥的作用。
酒店经营者一致称赞 mycloud PMS 直观且用户友好的界面。这种易用性有助于快速培训员工并顺利开展日常运营,即使没有丰富技术知识的员工也能轻松使用。
用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增... 用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增加了收入机会。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论指出,缺乏移动应用程序是一个重大缺陷。用户表示需要一款移动应用程序来随时随地管理操作,他们认为这将进一步提高系统的灵活性和可用性。
有些用户报告称,mycloud PMS 偶尔会变慢,通常将其归因于互联网连接问题。虽然基于云的特性是有益的,但这也意味着系统的性能可能会受到网络速度的影响。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 提供 29 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。myCloud Hospitality PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 88,myCloud Hospitality PMS 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案