Apaleo Open PMS vs. Shiji Daylight PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 64 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 64 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

apaleo GmbH 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.

Shiji Group 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Apaleo Open PMS 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 64 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
78
75
推荐可能性
97%
90%
易用性
4.9/5
4.6/5
客户支持
4.8/5
4.6/5
性价比
4.8/5
4.5/5
起始价格 From $900/mo From $1,200/mo
经验证的评价 30 34

Apaleo Open PMS 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 64 条经验证的评价后,apaleo GmbH 用户最看重其 频繁更新和社区参与, 定制化和灵活性, open api and integration,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

apaleo GmbH apaleo GmbH Shiji Group Shiji Group
优点
+ 频繁更新和社区参与
+ 易于使用
+ 定制化和灵活性
+ 支持团队
+ Open API and Integration
+ 执行
+ App Store and Third-Party Integrations
+ 培训材料
缺点
报告功能
报告和分析
团体和预订管理
系统速度
集成能力

apaleo GmbH 对比 Shiji Group:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 apaleo GmbH apaleo GmbH Shiji Group Shiji Group
小型(10-24 间客房) #42 7 条评价 #53 2 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #27 19 条评价 #31 17 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #41 1 条评价 #11 13 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #14 3 条评价 #22 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 apaleo GmbH apaleo GmbH Shiji Group Shiji Group
精品酒店 #34 14 条评价 #33 17 条评价
豪华酒店 #43 4 条评价 #24 25 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #40 4 条评价 #22 19 条评价
长住酒店 #19 9 条评价 #45 2 条评价

按区域

细分市场 apaleo GmbH apaleo GmbH Shiji Group Shiji Group
北美 #38 2 条评价 #33 4 条评价
欧洲 #18 26 条评价 #30 8 条评价
亚太 #14 5 条评价
中东 #5 14 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and growth potential. Both Apaleo Open PMS by apaleo GmbH and Shiji Daylight PMS by Shiji Group aim to streamline hotel operations, but they approach this goal differently. Your decision should hinge on your hotel’s size, technological needs, and preferred level of customization, as both products address core PMS functions but diverge in features, integrations, and user experience.

Apaleo’s open API architecture makes it highly adaptable for hotels seeking tailor-made solutions, while Shiji’s more comprehensive feature set targets larger properties or hotel groups wanting an all-in-one platform. But which one better matches your hotel’s specific requirements?

Is Apaleo or Shiji Better for Hotels?

Both Apaleo and Shiji deliver cloud-based PMS solutions that centralize guest data and automate routine tasks, yet they differ in scope and flexibility. Apaleo’s platform is designed for hotels and serviced apartments that want to build their tech ecosystem through third-party integrations, giving it an edge in customization. Shiji offers a wider array of built-in features aimed at larger hotel groups, with many modules designed to provide end-to-end management from reservations to housekeeping.

While Apaleo’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, open API, and community support, Shiji’s strengths lie in its extensive feature library, particularly for larger hotels seeking a unified system. The question is whether your hotel prefers a modular, flexible system or a feature-rich, integrated platform.

Apaleo vs Shiji: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a flexible, API-first system that adapts easily to your existing tech stack, go with Apaleo. Its open architecture supports rapid customization, and its user-friendly interface suits hotels looking to automate workflows without sacrificing control over their technology environment. Conversely, if your hotel or group prioritizes a comprehensive, all-in-one PMS with extensive modules—such as advanced reporting, guest profiles, and automation—Shiji’s broader feature set makes it the better choice.

For boutique hotels or serviced apartments aiming for agility, Apaleo’s ability to connect with third-party apps is invaluable. Larger hotels or chains requiring a unified platform with multiple integrated modules should lean toward Shiji.

Is Apaleo or Shiji Easier to Use?

Apaleo’s ease of use is reflected in its high UI/UX rating of 4.9/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive, friendly interface. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.85/5, enabling hotel staff to adopt the system quickly, even with minimal prior experience. Users highlight the simplicity of navigating complex functionalities thanks to its clean design and open API, which minimizes training time.

Shiji’s user-friendliness is also well-rated at 4.63/5, with an emphasis on straightforward operation and accessible training materials. However, its broader feature set can introduce additional complexity, requiring more initial training.

Edge: Apaleo.

Which Has Better Features: Apaleo or Shiji?

Shiji offers a significantly larger feature set with 63 modules compared to Apaleo’s 2 exclusive features, such as its channel manager and mobile app. Shiji’s extensive modules include guest profiles, multi-lingual support, task management, online check-in/out, integrated CRM, and a housekeeping module—features that enhance operational automation and guest personalization.

Apaleo’s core strength is its open API, enabling integrations rather than providing a broad suite of built-in features. If your hotel values a customizable system with minimal preloaded modules, Apaleo’s flexibility is key. But for a comprehensive, ready-to-use platform, Shiji’s rich feature library is unmatched.

Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Apaleo or Shiji?

Based on recent reviews, Apaleo’s support team scores a high 4.83/5, with many users praising its responsiveness and community engagement. Reviewers often mention that Apaleo’s support is quick, friendly, and helpful, making onboarding and troubleshooting smoother.

Shiji’s support, rated at 4.53/5, is also highly regarded, with users appreciating the helpfulness and professionalism of their support staff. However, some reviews mention slower responses during peak times and room for improvement in support responsiveness.

Edge: Apaleo.

Which Has More Integrations: Apaleo or Shiji?

Apaleo leads with 120 verified partners, providing extensive options for connecting with revenue management, payment solutions, and other systems. Shared integrations include popular providers like SiteMinder, Revinate, and FLYR Hospitality. Its open API enables hotels to add custom integrations easily.

Shiji, with 64 verified partners, includes major industry players like Amadeus, Onity, and Goki. While it offers many integrations, the smaller partner count limits flexibility for custom or niche integrations.

Edge: Apaleo.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Apaleo or Shiji?

Apaleo’s recent reviews are more numerous and current, with 29 reviews in the last six months, compared to Shiji’s 32 overall but none recent. Apaleo’s high NPS score of 9.69/5 and 97% likelihood to recommend reflect strong user satisfaction, especially among boutique and serviced apartment hotels.

Shiji’s reviews tend to focus on larger hotel groups, with a rating of 8.94/5 for likelihood to recommend, but no recent reviews to gauge current performance. Given the recency and volume of feedback, Apaleo’s ratings are more representative of current user sentiment.

Edge: Apaleo.

How Much Do Apaleo and Shiji Cost?

Apaleo charges a base price of $900, with no additional implementation or monthly per-room fees, making it predictable and affordable for small to mid-sized hotels. Shiji’s base price is $1,200, which may include more modules but comes at a slightly higher upfront cost.

Pricing details for both products do not specify ongoing fees, but Apaleo’s lower base price combined with its flexible architecture suggests better value, especially for hotels seeking a modular setup.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Apaleo?

  • Hotels that want to customize their tech stack with third-party integrations.
  • Hotels seeking a flexible, API-first platform to scale operations.
  • Boutique hotels or serviced apartments aiming for agility and control.
  • Teams that prioritize quick onboarding and simple user interfaces.
  • Hotels looking to reduce costs while maintaining operational flexibility.

Not ideal if you require a large, built-in feature suite from the start or need extensive out-of-the-box modules.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Shiji?

  • Hotels or groups that prefer an all-in-one, feature-rich PMS.
  • Larger hotels or chains seeking centralized management with multiple modules.
  • Properties that benefit from integrated guest profiles, automation, and detailed reporting.
  • Hotels prioritizing a proven platform used by major brands.
  • Hotels looking for extensive reporting and automation tools out of the box.

Not ideal if you prefer a modular, API-driven approach or have limited technical resources to manage complex integrations.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference between Apaleo and Shiji is their approach: Apaleo offers a flexible, API-first system designed for customization, while Shiji provides a comprehensive, feature-packed platform for large-scale hotel operations. Both products support cloud-based management, but your choice depends on your hotel’s size, tech needs, and growth plans.

If your hotel values agility, customization, and lower initial costs, Apaleo is the clear choice. Its recent reviews confirm it’s well-liked for ease of use, support, and ongoing community engagement, making it the more current and highly-rated solution.

On the other hand, if you need a broad range of modules integrated into a single platform with extensive automation and reporting, Shiji’s larger feature set is advantageous. Its appeal is strongest among larger hotel groups that want a ready-made, unified management solution.

In summary, for most hotels seeking a flexible, modern PMS with recent positive feedback and active support, Apaleo stands out. It’s better suited for hotels aiming for lightweight customization and operational efficiency, whereas Shiji remains ideal for those needing a deep, all-encompassing system with extensive features.

Apaleo Open PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

apaleo GmbH apaleo GmbH Shiji Group Shiji Group
Starting Price From $900/mo From $1,200/mo

Apaleo Open PMS 有哪些 Shiji Daylight PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Apaleo Open PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 35 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 apaleo GmbH apaleo GmbH Shiji Group Shiji Group
任务管理
多种语言
宾客资料
平板电脑/自助值机
移动应用
网上值机
集中用户和角色管理
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 53 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:apaleo GmbH 对比 Shiji Group(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
apaleo GmbH mk | hotels 中型
+ Routine questions are now handled automatically, cutting guest call volume by 50%
+ Within just two months, the team saved over 70 hours that would otherwise have been spent on repetitive inquiries.
+ The system was up and running quickly, with a visible impact on daily operations and guest satisfaction within the very first month.

"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."

Arno Sonderfeld
Arno Sonderfeld
Company Leadership
Shiji Group Ruby Hotels 中型
+ Successfully went live with 21 hotels across Europe, with additional hotel openings planned in the near future.
+ Equipped with the level of API connectivity they needed to create connections between disparate data sets that would be impossible to achieve manually.
+ Mentions of Technology have increased by 2.5 points, Reception by 3 points and Service by 3.5 points.

"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."

Lucas Höfer
Lucas Höfer
Group Director of Systems and Innovation...
改善宾客体验
apaleo GmbH apaleo GmbH

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Shiji Group Sunborn London 小型
+ �s fully integrated tech stack, the team unified their data, simplified workflows, and elevated every touchpoint of the guest journey.
+ From seamless check-in and instant mobile ordering to real-time housekeeping updates, everything now runs faster, smoother, and with less effort.
+ Most importantly, technology now works in the background, freeing up staff to focus on what really matters: delivering memorable, personalized experiences that live up to Sunborn

"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."

V
Vasilis Giannios
Operations Manager, Sunborn London

apaleo GmbH 对比 Shiji Group:总结

apaleo GmbH
apaleo GmbH
4.9/5 来自 30 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

频繁更新和社区参与 95% 正面

该平台致力于定期更新和社区参与,并广受好评,用户也非常重视平台对用户反馈和持续改进的关注。活跃的社区构建了一个支持网络,提升了用户体验。

定制化和灵活性 94% 正面

用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务... 用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务。

Open API and Integration 100% 正面

Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告功能 50% 负面

虽然用户重视基本的报告功能,但 Apaleo 的高级报告功能需求也十分明显。许多人发现当前的选项有限,因此不得不依赖其他工具进行更深入的分析。

团体和预订管理 43% 负面

Apaleo 的群组管理功能因其用户友好性而受到称赞,但一些评论指出仍有需要改进的地方,特别是在综合功能和直观性方面。

排名更高的方面

中型(25-74 间客房) #27 vs #31
小型(10-24 间客房) #42 vs #53
超大型(200+ 间客房) #14 vs #22
住宿加早餐与客栈 #42 vs #46

独特功能

频道管理员 移动应用
4.9/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 120 个集成
查看资料
Shiji Group
Shiji Group
4.5/5 来自 34 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 97% 正面

用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。

支持团队 83% 正面

石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。

执行 83% 正面

一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告和分析 62% 负面

尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。

系统速度 57% 负面

与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #11 vs #41
品牌/连锁酒店 #22 vs #40
市中心酒店 #29 vs #31
机场/会议酒店 #26 vs #28

独特功能

宾客资料 多种语言 集中用户和角色管理 任务管理 平板电脑/自助值机
4.6/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 64 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

性价比 apaleo GmbH 4.9 vs 4.5 (+0.4)
入职培训 apaleo GmbH 4.9 vs 4.4 (+0.5)

关于 Apaleo Open PMS 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的常见问题

Apaleo Open PMS 能否替代 Shiji Daylight PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Apaleo Open PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Apaleo Open PMS 提供 120 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Apaleo Open PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Apaleo Open PMS 或 Shiji Daylight PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Apaleo Open PMS:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Apaleo Open PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。apaleo GmbH 的 HT Score 为 78,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息