The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Exely 表现出色 在 user interface 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Requests and Guest Feedback Management.
基于 HTR 上 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 56 |
在分析了 58 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 ,而 Exely 用户则强调 user interface, 客户支持, hotel operation efficiency。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
Hotel Operation Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
自定义和报告功能
▾
|
|
|
−
系统性能和速度
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #33 2 条评价 | #23 16 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #28 0 条评价 | #17 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #16 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 0 条评价 | #11 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #42 0 条评价 | #22 13 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #40 0 条评价 | #20 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #29 1 条评价 | #25 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #32 0 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #19 2 条评价 | #22 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #24 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #22 0 条评价 | #6 28 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #7 5 条评价 |
Choosing between ASI PMS and Exely hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both promise to streamline management, but they diverge significantly in features, support, and market presence. ASI PMS offers a more comprehensive, established solution with a broader feature set and deeper integrations, while Exely emphasizes ease of use and online booking enhancement. Can your team afford a more complex system with extensive capabilities, or do you prefer a straightforward platform?
Both products aim to simplify hotel management, but ASI PMS provides a full-spectrum platform that consolidates reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and revenue management into a single interface. Exely, on the other hand, focuses heavily on online bookings, reputation, and ease of integration, making it ideal for hotels aiming to boost direct reservations. Given the vast difference in review volume and recent feedback, ASI PMS’s recent reviews (18 in last 6 months) give it a clearer current picture. So, which aligns better with your hotel’s scope and growth ambitions?
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-property system capable of handling complex workflows and detailed reporting, go with ASI PMS, which has over 20 years of experience and a broad feature suite. For boutique hotels, city-center properties, or those heavily dependent on online reputation and direct bookings, Exely’s intuitive platform and specialized tools might be more suitable. If operational efficiency and extensive integrations are priorities, ASI PMS clearly leads, but if quick setup and increasing direct bookings matter most, Exely could be a better fit.
ASI PMS boasts a 5/5 ease-of-use rating based on reviews, with users describing it as highly intuitive and requiring minimal training. Its onboarding process is rated 5/5, and support is consistently praised for responsiveness, though some note performance issues during peak times. Exely scores slightly lower at 4.88/5, with reviews emphasizing its straightforward interface and quick navigation, plus excellent support. However, some users desire faster load times during high traffic. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS offers 17 exclusive features, including guest CRM, digital registration, integrated CRS, real-time reporting, and automated space optimization—features critical for operational control. Exely provides 8 unique features, mainly centered around online reputation management, booking engine, and guest messaging. While Exely is strong in online tools, ASI’s broader feature set and integrations give it a decisive advantage, especially for larger or multi-property hotels. Edge: ASI PMS.
Both products receive high praise for support, with ASI PMS rated 5/5 and Exely at 4.9/5. ASI’s support team is noted for professionalism and responsiveness, with some reviews mentioning its ability to resolve issues promptly. Exely’s team excels in continuous improvement and accessibility, with users appreciating their quick responses and friendly communication. Given the recent review volume, ASI’s support reputation is slightly stronger and more consistent. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS connects with 19 verified third-party partners, including major OTAs, payment systems, and CRM platforms, supporting extensive workflows. Exely offers 8 verified integrations, mainly focusing on booking engines, online reputation, and some channel management tools. If your hotel relies on a wide array of integrations for operations, ASI PMS’s larger partner ecosystem is advantageous. Edge: ASI PMS.
Despite ASI PMS’s limited review count (2 reviews, both in the last 6 months), it’s rated 5/5, with hoteliers praising its reliability and efficiency. Exely, with 44 reviews, averages around 4.0/5—a solid score but less recent, indicating a more stable, mature user base. For hotels prioritizing current, detailed feedback, ASI PMS’s higher recent ratings give it a slight edge.
ASI PMS is priced at a flat $300 per month with no implementation or trial fees, offering transparent, straightforward billing. Exely costs $400 monthly, also without additional fees, but its higher price may reflect its added focus on online booking features. Both are subscription-based, but ASI PMS’s lower price point offers better value for broader capabilities.
Core difference: ASI PMS is a broad, feature-rich platform built for scalability and multi-property management, while Exely emphasizes online booking and reputation tools for smaller or boutique hotels. If your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-function system with deep integrations, ASI PMS is the clear choice. For properties aiming to grow direct bookings and simplify online reputation, Exely offers a more targeted approach.
When to choose ASI PMS: If operational complexity, extensive integrations, and detailed reporting are priorities, go with ASI PMS, which has a longer history and broader feature set. Its recent reviews reinforce its strength and reliability for larger or multi-property hotels seeking efficiency and control.
When to choose Exely: If your hotel’s main focus is increasing direct reservations, managing online reviews, and maintaining a straightforward management system, Exely’s ease of use and online tools make it the better option. Its recent growth and solid support support a good fit for boutique or city-center hotels aiming for digital growth.
Final verdict: For hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich management system with proven reliability and recent positive reviews, ASI PMS is the stronger choice. If your hotel requires a user-friendly platform that boosts online bookings and reputation, Exely provides a solid, cost-effective alternative.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS - All-in-one Hotel Management Software 和 Exely HMS 共享 30 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款请求 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
The intuitive and straightforward interface of Exely significantly enhances user experience, making it easier for staff to navigate during busy period... The intuitive and straightforward interface of Exely significantly enhances user experience, making it easier for staff to navigate during busy periods and integrating seamlessly into daily operations.
客户支持团队因其快速响应和乐于助人而受到赞扬,确保任何问题都能得到迅速解决,但这并非Exely独有的特点,而是一个更普遍的特点。
Exely is praised for streamlining hotel operations, reducing errors and enhancing overall workflow efficiency by automating various processes and task... Exely is praised for streamlining hotel operations, reducing errors and enhancing overall workflow efficiency by automating various processes and tasks.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户表示需要更高级的报告选项和自定义功能,以便进行更深入的性能分析和个性化的用户体验,而这些在当前的系统中是缺乏的。
有批评指出,该系统在高峰工作负载期间的性能存在问题,报告称加载时间过长、偶尔出现错误以及意外注销阻碍了操作流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS - All-in-one Hotel Management Software 和 Exely HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS - All-in-one Hotel Management Software 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely HMS 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS - All-in-one Hotel Management Software 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS - All-in-one Hotel Management Software:否。Exely HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 0,Exely 的为 82。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问