The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 27 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
Hores 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Requests and Guest App.
基于 HTR 上 27 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 0 |
在分析了 27 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 Hores 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 | #72 1 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #51 2 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #48 1 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) can feel overwhelming, especially when both options aim to streamline hotel operations. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) offers a well-established, cloud-based platform with a strong track record and active user reviews, while HoresPlus claims to provide a modern, integrated solution trusted by hundreds of hotels but lacks recent user feedback. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven stability and extensive reviews or newer, potentially more innovative features. Which system aligns with your hotel’s growth plans?
Both ASI PMS and HoresPlus aim to simplify hotel management, but they diverge significantly in user feedback and feature depth. ASI is the more established product with 26 recent reviews, a 77.4 score, and high satisfaction ratings, reflecting ongoing trust from users. HoresPlus, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction. While Hores promotes a broad suite of features, the absence of recent reviews raises questions about its current performance and support. Are you comfortable betting on a less-reviewed platform, or do you prefer a system with proven reliability?
If your hotel needs a mature, highly-rated property management system with a proven track record, go with ASI PMS. Its 26 recent reviews and 97% likelihood to recommend demonstrate consistent user satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support. Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes a modern, flexible platform with unique features like guest messaging or online checkout, HoresPlus might appeal — but beware of the lack of recent feedback, which could signal limited support or stability.
For hotels focused on stability, scalability, and a broad ecosystem of integrations, ASI is the safer, more reliable choice. If you seek cutting-edge features and are willing to tolerate potential teething issues, HoresPlus could be worth exploring, but with caution due to the absence of recent reviews.
Based on current data, ASI PMS scores an impressive 4.88 out of 5 for ease of use, supported by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward daily operations. Users mention that onboarding is smooth and staff adopt the system quickly, with no major complaints about complexity. Since there are no recent reviews for HoresPlus, it's impossible to assess its usability, though its marketing emphasizes an "intelligent hub" designed for ease. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS offers 43 shared features, with four exclusive ones including cloud and on-premise options, PCI compliance, and automated night audit. HoresPlus provides six unique features like guest messaging, online checkout, and GDPR compliance, but fewer overall integrations. While Hores boasts some modern amenities, ASI’s extensive reporting, reservation management, and integration ecosystem give it a significant edge in versatility. Edge: ASI PMS.
Recent reviews indicate ASI PMS’s customer support is highly rated at 4.73 out of 5, with users describing support staff as professional, courteous, and responsive. Some mention prompt resolution of technical issues, although a few note delays during peak times. With no recent feedback available for HoresPlus, it’s impossible to evaluate its support quality. Given ASI’s established reputation and recent positive feedback, it clearly leads in support. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS connects with 18 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and industry platforms like SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn. HoresPlus offers seven verified integrations, focusing on booking engines and hotel-specific systems, but lacks the broad ecosystem of ASI. If seamless integration with third-party tools is crucial for your operations, ASI’s extensive partner network provides more flexibility. Edge: ASI PMS.
With 26 recent reviews, ASI PMS boasts a 77.4 overall score and a 97% likelihood of recommendation, indicating high satisfaction across various hotel segments. Users emphasize its ease of use, support, and stability. HoresPlus, lacking recent reviews and ratings, cannot be reliably compared. Given current data, hoteliers clearly prefer ASI. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS has a transparent pricing model with a base fee of $300.00, with no mention of additional monthly charges or implementation fees. Pricing details for HoresPlus are unavailable, which complicates direct comparison. Unless HoresPlus offers competitive or flexible pricing, ASI’s clear cost structure makes budgeting easier. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS is a mature, well-supported platform with proven stability, extensive integrations, and high user ratings, making it ideal for hotels that value reliability and comprehensive reporting. Its 26 recent reviews and 97% recommendation rate demonstrate consistent satisfaction, especially for properties with complex operations or growth plans.
HoresPlus offers a modern, feature-rich alternative emphasizing guest communication and streamlined workflows but lacks recent user feedback to validate its current performance. If your hotel is willing to take a chance on newer technology and prioritize features like guest messaging, it could be suitable—yet the risk remains without recent reviews.
For the most reliable, well-supported property management experience, go with ASI PMS. If you need an innovative, guest-centric system and are prepared to navigate potential support uncertainties, HoresPlus may be worth exploring further. However, the safer choice remains ASI, especially given its proven track record.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 HoresPlus 共享 43 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款请求 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 访客应用 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 HoresPlus 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HoresPlus 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。HoresPlus:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,Hores 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案