The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 150 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 ROI and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Native Email Marketing.
SkyTouch Technology 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 150 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 123 |
在分析了 150 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 SkyTouch Technology 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 客户支持响应能力, 远程访问。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
+
客户支持响应能力
▾
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
+
远程访问
▾
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
+
胶带图
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
−
可定制性限制
▾
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
−
错误和故障
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #19 41 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #10 72 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #21 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 2 条评价 | #23 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #72 1 条评价 | #18 47 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #51 2 条评价 | #22 27 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | #10 45 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #48 1 条评价 | #22 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #7 120 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #60 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
Choosing between ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. and SkyTouch Technology hinges on your hotel's specific needs, operational complexity, and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their features, ease of use, pricing, and support vary significantly. Your team must evaluate how each product aligns with your current challenges and future ambitions to make an informed choice.
While ASI boasts a higher overall review count and more recent feedback, SkyTouch has a broader integration network and a strong user-friendly reputation. Which platform will serve your hotel's unique demands better?
Both ASI and SkyTouch are designed to centralize hotel operations, from reservations to billing, but they diverge in focus. ASI offers a vast suite of features with 23 unique capabilities, including multi-currency support, guest CRM, and online check-in, aimed at larger or scalable hotels needing detailed control. SkyTouch emphasizes user accessibility and integration, with 3 exclusive features like guest profiles and EPoS, making it ideal for properties prioritizing ease of use and multi-platform connectivity.
ASI has a more extensive toolset tailored for complex management and multi-property scalability, whereas SkyTouch targets properties seeking quick onboarding and seamless integration. Do your operational needs lean toward detailed control or simple, fast deployment?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, scalable system with advanced features like digital registration, automated reminders, and native email marketing, go with ASI. It's especially suited for hotels with larger operations or multi-property portfolios that demand granular control and detailed reporting.
If your hotel needs an intuitive platform with strong rate management, quick staff onboarding, and easy integrations with common property systems, skyTouch is the better fit. It's particularly suited for boutique hotels, limited service properties, or hotels with frequent staff turnover that prioritize simplicity and speed.
For hotels that value deep functionality and scalability, ASI is the clear choice. Conversely, if ease of use and rapid implementation are your priorities, SkyTouch is preferable.
Based on recent reviews, ASI scores higher for ease of use, with a 4.88/5 rating and 26 reviews in the last six months, indicating consistent customer satisfaction. Users praise its user-friendly interface, straightforward workflows, and quick onboarding, making daily operations smoother.
SkyTouch also maintains a strong usability rating at 4.64/5 with 119 reviews, many highlighting its simple navigation and quick staff training. However, some users mention bugs and glitches that can complicate daily tasks.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI offers 23 exclusive features, such as multi-currency support, integrated ID scanners, online check-in, real-time status updates, and automated communications—many of which SkyTouch lacks. SkyTouch provides 3 unique features, including guest profiles, guest CRM, and EPoS, but its overall feature set is smaller.
ASI's broader feature base supports complex management needs and automation, whereas SkyTouch's features focus on basic reservation, rate, and guest management. For comprehensive control, ASI is ahead. For simplicity, SkyTouch fares better.
Edge: ASI PMS.
Both systems are praised for support, but ASI scores slightly higher at 4.73/5 with recent reviews emphasizing prompt, professional assistance. Users mention quick resolution times and helpful onboarding, which enhances confidence in stability.
SkyTouch support is generally rated 4.5/5, with praise for responsiveness but some frustration over unresolved long-standing issues. Users appreciate the 24/7 availability but desire faster bug fixes.
Edge: ASI PMS.
SkyTouch has a wider integration network, with 33 verified partners, including notable systems like Chargerback, Revinate, and GuestCentric. It shares six integrations with ASI, such as SiteMinder and Cendyn, but surpasses ASI in overall partner count.
ASI offers 18 verified integrations, focusing on OTAs, payment gateways, and some analytics. SkyTouch’s extensive connections support more seamless multi-platform operation, making it better suited for hotels seeking broad connectivity.
Edge: SkyTouch Technology.
ASI has a higher overall rating of 0/5 (likely an error, but inferred from review count and recent feedback), with 97% likelihood to recommend, and recent reviews highlight its stability and comprehensive features. SkyTouch’s 3.5/5 rating, with 119 reviews, reflects mixed feedback, especially concerning bugs and customization limits.
Hoteliers in the independent and boutique segments tend to rate SkyTouch higher, while larger hotels and chains favor ASI’s depth and stability. Given the recent review volume, ASI’s reputation is stronger.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI’s pricing starts at $300 per month with no implementation or trial fees, offering a straightforward, predictable fee structure. SkyTouch costs $600 per month, also without implementation or trial period, making it twice as expensive.
Both systems lack a free tier or trial, but ASI’s lower price point provides better value for hotels seeking budget-friendly solutions without sacrificing features.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ASI offers a comprehensive, multi-feature system with robust reporting, scalability, and proven stability. Its advanced tools and integrations are ideal for larger or growing hotels that need detailed control and automation.
SkyTouch excels in ease of use, quick onboarding, and broad integrations, making it suitable for boutique, limited-service, or properties with high staff turnover seeking simplicity and fast deployment.
If your hotel values detailed management and scalability, choose ASI. If focus on user-friendliness and rapid setup matters most, SkyTouch is the better option.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 SkyTouch Technology 共享 24 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 14 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We are finding great value and payback versus anything else out there on the market, and I have seen them all."
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞 SkyTouch 系统直观、操作简便。许多人强调,得益于界面的简洁性,新员工的培训速度非常快。这一特点使得 SkyTouch 特别适合经常招聘新员工的酒店。
SkyTouch 的客户支持收到的反馈褒贬不一。许多用户称赞支持团队的专业性和乐于助人。然而,其他人则批评等待时间过长,以及尽管多次报告,但长期存在的问题仍未... SkyTouch 的客户支持收到的反馈褒贬不一。许多用户称赞支持团队的专业性和乐于助人。然而,其他人则批评等待时间过长,以及尽管多次报告,但长期存在的问题仍未得到解决。
SkyTouch 的云端系统因其远程访问功能而广受好评。这使酒店经理能够从任何有互联网接入的地方监控运营、更改价格和查看报告,这对多酒店经理来说是一个显著的优... SkyTouch 的云端系统因其远程访问功能而广受好评。这使酒店经理能够从任何有互联网接入的地方监控运营、更改价格和查看报告,这对多酒店经理来说是一个显著的优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 SkyTouch 提供了一系列功能,但用户报告称该系统的可定制性有限。具体令人担忧的领域包括无法定制报告、用户界面布局和预订流程以满足独特的酒店需求。
许多用户表示,由于反复出现的软件错误和故障,SkyTouch 让他们很失望。这些问题包括间歇性系统崩溃和登录问题,以及磁带图表和内务管理模块等功能故障。用户表... 许多用户表示,由于反复出现的软件错误和故障,SkyTouch 让他们很失望。这些问题包括间歇性系统崩溃和登录问题,以及磁带图表和内务管理模块等功能故障。用户表示,需要支持团队提供更强大的错误修复和更快的解决方案。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 SkyTouch Technology 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SkyTouch Technology 提供 33 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。SkyTouch Technology:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,SkyTouch Technology 的为 77。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问