The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #48 0 条评价 | #36 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #31 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 | #44 0 条评价 | #35 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #32 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #29 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #34 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #30 0 条评价 | #24 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #33 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #17 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Beds24 by Beds24 and Easy Innkeeping by GraceSoft hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in usability, features, and market presence. Beds24 offers a comprehensive, multi-channel management solution with a focus on automation and integrations, while GraceSoft emphasizes ease of use and customer support. Your choice depends on your hotel’s size, technological comfort, and operational priorities.
Given the recent review activity and the breadth of user feedback, GraceSoft’s higher review count and recent ratings make it the more dependable option for your hotel. Beds24, despite its extensive features, lacks current reviews and a recent user base to support its effectiveness. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operational style?
Beds24 and GraceSoft both serve as management systems that help organize reservations, automate tasks, and connect with booking portals. Yet, Beds24’s focus is on offering an all-in-one solution for property managers handling multiple properties, especially vacation rentals and agencies, while GraceSoft targets small to midsize hotels seeking straightforward management with excellent support.
Beds24 boasts a robust channel manager, a property management system (PMS), and workflow automation, but it has no recent reviews or a high user rating to evidence its current reliability. GraceSoft, by contrast, has a strong reputation for customer support, ease of onboarding, and a focus on simplicity, supported by 5 recent reviews and an 8/5 NPS score. Are you prioritizing automation and integrations over ease of use and support?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, multi-channel platform capable of managing a broad portfolio across various booking sites and automating complex workflows, Beds24 may be suitable—but be cautious as its recent review absence suggests limited current user feedback. If your hotel values a user-friendly interface, dedicated support, and a proven track record of recent positive reviews, GraceSoft is the clear choice, especially with their 5 recent reviews and 80% likelihood to recommend.
For hotels that operate across multiple channels and require extensive integrations, Beds24’s 19 verified partners and channel management capabilities give it an edge. Conversely, if ease of onboarding, customer service, and an intuitive interface are imperative, GraceSoft’s near-perfect ease-of-use rating and high review count make it the safer pick.
GraceSoft scores an impressive 4.4/5 for ease of use, backed by a 4.67/5 onboarding rating and glowing reviews praising their support team’s availability and courteous assistance. Its interface is designed for simplicity, making staff adoption straightforward, even for those with limited technical experience.
Beds24, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use, indicating significant usability challenges or a steep learning curve, with no recent reviews to demonstrate current user satisfaction. The absence of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess whether it has improved in this area.
Edge: GraceSoft.
Beds24 offers 29 shared features with its competitor but includes 3 unique features like GDPR compliance, Housekeeping Mobile App, and RevPaR & ADR Reports, appealing to advanced users needing automation and compliance tools. GraceSoft, with 19 exclusive features, excels with multi-currency handling, online checkout, integrated payment terminals, revenue management, guest CRM, and tablet check-in, catering to operational convenience.
While Beds24’s features are broad, GraceSoft’s suite is more tailored toward hotel operations with tools that directly impact guest experience and revenue. If you need advanced automation and legal compliance, Beds24 could be advantageous; for streamlined hotel management with guest engagement, GraceSoft leads.
Edge: GraceSoft.
GraceSoft’s perfect 5/5 customer support rating, coupled with an 8/5 NPS score, signals exceptional support and responsiveness. Users describe the support team as courteous, available, and quick to resolve issues, making it an ideal choice for properties with limited technical resources or those new to PMS systems.
Beds24’s support details are scarce, and with a 0/5 support rating and no recent reviews, confidence in its current support quality is low. This lack of recent user feedback is a critical consideration.
Edge: GraceSoft.
Beds24 stands out with 19 verified integrations including major OTAs like TripAdvisor, Booking.com, Vrbo, and channel partners such as Whistle and Duve. Its extensive connectivity makes it suitable for property managers needing a centralized system with many third-party options.
GraceSoft offers no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with external platforms or tools. For properties requiring a broad integration ecosystem, Beds24’s partnerships are a distinct advantage.
Edge: Beds24.
Despite Beds24’s extensive features, it has no recent reviews or ratings to support current property experiences. GraceSoft’s recent reviews showcase high satisfaction, with an 80% likelihood to recommend, especially among small to midsize hotels and resorts.
GraceSoft’s reviews highlight its ease of use and exceptional support, whereas Beds24’s lack of recent feedback leaves its user satisfaction uncertain. For properties seeking proven, recent positive experiences, GraceSoft is the preferred choice.
Edge: GraceSoft.
Beds24 charges a base price of $100, with no freemium option, monthly flat fee, or per-room charges, but it offers no trial period. GraceSoft’s starting price is $300 and includes a 30-day trial, providing an opportunity to evaluate the system before commitment.
Considering the pricing difference, GraceSoft’s higher cost reflects its focus on customer support and ease of use, making it potentially more cost-effective for hotels prioritizing a smooth onboarding and ongoing support.
Not ideal if your team prefers straightforward interfaces, high-touch support, or are in need of a platform with verified recent reviews.
Not ideal if your team prefers a platform with broad automation, legal compliance features, or is looking for a lower-cost solution without ongoing support.
The core difference is that Beds24 offers a comprehensive channel management and automation system suited for multi-property or vacation rental managers, but it lacks recent user feedback and current reviews. GraceSoft focuses on ease of use, support, and features tailored for small to midsize hotels, backed by recent positive reviews.
If your hotel requires a highly customizable, integration-rich platform and can manage some usability challenges, Beds24 is suitable. For properties that prioritize support, quick onboarding, and proven satisfaction, GraceSoft remains the better option.
Choose Beds24 if your operations demand extensive automation and channel connectivity, and your team is comfortable with a steeper learning curve. Opt for GraceSoft if you want a straightforward, well-supported system proven by recent hotel user ratings and reviews.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Beds24 和 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Beds24 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Beds24:否。GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Beds24 的 HT Score 为 0,GraceSoft 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案