The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Engineer.ai 表现出色 .
STAY 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 215 |
在分析了 215 条经验证的评价后,Engineer.ai 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel guest app can significantly impact your guest experience, operational efficiency, and revenue. Both Builder.ai and STAY aim to simplify processes, but they serve very different needs—Builder.ai is a custom software builder, while STAY provides a ready-to-use guest engagement platform. Your choice hinges on whether you need a bespoke solution or a proven, specialized guest app.
Builder.ai offers broad software development capabilities suited for tailored internal tools, whereas STAY focuses on digitizing hotel services directly for guests. Are you looking to develop custom internal apps or enhance your guests’ on-property experience?
Builder.ai is primarily a platform for creating custom applications without requiring tech expertise, making it ideal if your hotel needs specific internal tools or integrations. It’s designed for businesses aiming to build unique solutions, not necessarily to improve guest-facing services directly.
In contrast, STAY offers an out-of-the-box guest app that streamlines hotel services like room reservations, messaging, and local recommendations, aimed explicitly at improving guest satisfaction and operational flow. While Builder.ai boasts zero recent reviews and a general focus on software creation, STAY has accumulated over 200 recent reviews highlighting its practical benefits.
Builder.ai’s strengths lie in developing tailored apps for your internal operations—if you want a custom reservation system, staff management tool, or other bespoke software, Builder.ai could work. On the other hand, STAY’s strengths are in its proven ability to digitize guest interactions, reduce queues, and boost revenue through direct guest engagement.
Do you want a custom software solution for internal needs, or a guest app that enhances your hotel’s front-line service?
If your hotel needs a custom application to manage operations, automate workflows, or integrate with existing systems, Builder.ai is the better choice. It’s suited for teams that want to design unique internal tools without hiring a developer, thanks to its drag-and-drop builder and human-assisted AI.
If your priority is improving guest experiences, reducing front desk queues, and increasing revenue with a ready-made mobile app, STAY clearly leads. Its over 200 recent reviews and a 96% likelihood to recommend reflect its effectiveness in delivering immediate benefits to hotels of all sizes, especially those seeking a straightforward solution.
For hotels aiming to digitize the guest journey quickly and reliably, STAY’s extensive feature set and proven track record make it the most suitable product.
Builder.ai’s platform is designed for those with some technical curiosity but lacks specific hotel-focused UI/UX ratings, making its ease of use somewhat uncertain for non-developers. Its onboarding process is not detailed in reviews, which suggests a steeper learning curve for hotel teams unfamiliar with software development.
STAY, by comparison, boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5 and a 4.63/5 onboarding rating, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and simple implementation. Hotel staff find it straightforward to update content, manage requests, and communicate with guests.
Edge: STAY.
Builder.ai provides no hotel-specific features out of the box, focusing instead on general-purpose app creation. Its capabilities depend entirely on what you design, making it flexible but not specialized for hospitality.
STAY offers 14 hotel-specific features, including guest messaging, chatbots, request management, room service ordering, local recommendations, and multilingual support. These features are proven to increase operational efficiency and guest satisfaction, with numerous case studies showing tangible benefits.
Edge: STAY.
Builder.ai provides support that is not well-documented in recent reviews, and with no recent reviews available, its support quality is uncertain. Its focus on software development means support may be more technical and less hospitality-oriented.
STAY’s customer support ranks at 4.83/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and dedicated onboarding. Hoteliers particularly appreciate its proactive assistance and ease of communication.
Edge: STAY.
Builder.ai has no verified integrations listed, which could limit its ability to connect with existing hotel systems without custom development. This makes it less suitable if seamless integration with your PMS, CRM, or other tools is a priority.
STAY integrates with 20 verified partners, including Hotelkit, Winhotel, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews. These connections support smooth data flow and operational cohesion, reducing manual work and potential errors.
Edge: STAY.
Builder.ai has no reviews or recent ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Without recent feedback, its real-world performance remains unverified.
STAY’s reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 9.59/10 NPS score and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of all segments, from independent boutique hotels to large chains like NH Hotels and Riu, rate it highly for improving guest experience and operational efficiency.
Edge: STAY.
Builder.ai does not publicly disclose its pricing, as it’s a custom software development platform. Costs vary based on project scope, complexity, and ongoing support.
STAY charges a $300 monthly fee per property, with no implementation or additional setup fees. Its transparent pricing and proven ROI make it easy to evaluate and justify.
In summary, if you need custom software tailored to your hotel’s unique needs, Builder.ai’s flexible platform could be suitable, but expect higher costs and a longer deployment process. For a ready-made, hotel-focused guest app delivering quick results, STAY offers clearer value at a predictable price.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Builder.ai is a platform for creating custom internal apps, while STAY is a ready-made guest engagement solution. If your team has the resources and specific needs for internal software, Builder.ai can be a fit, but expect higher costs and longer timelines.
For hotels focused on enhancing guest experiences with proven tools, STAY stands out with its high user ratings, extensive features, and strong integration network. Its latest reviews confirm its effectiveness in reducing queues, increasing revenue, and improving guest satisfaction.
In conclusion, choose Builder.ai if you need tailored internal solutions and have the capacity to develop and maintain them. Opt for STAY if your priority is a straightforward, hotel-specific app that delivers immediate, measurable benefits to your property and guests.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Builder.ai 和 STAY Guest App 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Builder.ai 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Builder.ai 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Builder.ai:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Engineer.ai 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问