The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #30 0 条评价 | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 2 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #33 1 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #37 0 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #25 1 条评价 | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 3 条评价 | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Carlito App by Carlito and STAY Guest App by STAY hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational goals. Both aim to enhance the guest experience and streamline hotel operations, but they approach these goals differently. Carlito offers a customizable guest concierge with operational tools, while STAY functions as a comprehensive guest experience platform with a strong focus on digitization and integration. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
The key differentiator is their market presence and review data. STAY boasts over 200 recent reviews and a significantly higher overall rating, making it the more proven choice for hotels seeking reliability and extensive functionality. Does your hotel value a platform with proven scale and consistent feedback?
With over 200 recent reviews and a 3/5 overall rating, STAY Guest App clearly outperforms Carlito App, which has only 3 reviews and a 0/5 rating. STAY’s broader feature set, deeper integrations, and larger hotel user base make it the more dependable choice for modern hoteliers.
If your hotel needs a robust, well-supported guest app with proven results across multiple regions and hotel types, STAY is the clear winner. For more personalized, concierge-style solutions, Carlito might appeal, but its limited reviews and feature set weaken its case.
Both Carlito and STAY aim to improve guest engagement and streamline operations, but they do so differently. Carlito emphasizes customization, allowing hotels to build a personalized app experience, focusing on features like chat, push notifications, and hotel info, mainly targeting resorts and boutique hotels. STAY, however, offers a broader platform that digitizes services like reservations, room service, and guest info, with proven success in large hotel chains and resorts.
Carlito’s appeal lies in its flexibility and ease of use, making it suitable for hotels prioritizing guest personalization and boutique services. STAY's extensive integrations and proven impact on operational efficiency appeal to larger hotel groups seeking scalable solutions. Do you prefer tailored guest interactions or comprehensive service digitization?
Edge: STAY Guest App.
If your hotel needs a flexible, customizable guest app that enhances personal guest interactions and promotes cross-selling, Carlito is the better fit. Its user-friendly interface and customization options appeal to resorts and boutique hotels aiming for a tailored guest experience.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, integration with other hotel systems, and proven results in reducing queues and increasing revenue, STAY is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set, including mobile checkouts, guest profiles, and robust integrations, suits hotel chains and larger properties looking for a comprehensive digital solution.
For smaller resorts or boutique hotels prioritizing personalized guest engagement, Carlito may suffice. For larger hotels or chains focused on digitization and operational impact, STAY is the more suitable choice.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Both platforms score high on ease of use, with Carlito rated 4.67/5 and STAY slightly higher at 4.78/5. Carlito’s onboarding process is praised for simplicity, and users find it easy to update and customize content, with reviews highlighting its structured design.
STAY’s user interface is described as intuitive and friendly, with a CMS that simplifies content management for hotel staff. Its mobile app is also lauded for straightforward navigation, making it easy for staff and guests to manage tasks seamlessly.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Carlito offers 7 shared features, including basic guest information, communication, and program management, but lacks advanced features. STAY, however, offers 7 unique features like mobile app access, chatbots, automated replies, guest profiles, message routing, mobile checkout, and app download, significantly expanding functionality.
STAY’s features allow for more automation, personalization, and operational control, with capabilities designed for large-scale hotel management. Carlito's features are simpler, suitable for basic guest engagement but less capable for complex operations.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Both platforms enjoy high support ratings, with Carlito rated 4.67/5 and STAY slightly higher at 4.83/5. Carlito’s support team is praised for openness to improvements and ease of contact, while STAY’s support is known for quick, helpful responses and dedicated assistance, as reflected in client success stories.
Reviews highlight STAY’s reliable support during hotel digitization projects, especially large chain implementations. Carlito’s smaller support team may offer more personalized service but with less extensive coverage.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
STAY offers 20 verified partners, including major PMS and distribution systems like Hotelkit, Apaleo, and SiteMinder, enabling seamless data flow and operational integration. Carlito, with only 2 verified partners, has limited integration options, including Mews and ASA Hotelsoftware.
The broader integration ecosystem of STAY allows it to fit into diverse hotel tech stacks, making it more adaptable for hotels with complex system requirements. Carlito’s limited integrations restrict its flexibility for larger or more technologically advanced hotels.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
STAY’s review score of 3/5 is based on 200+ recent reviews, with high marks from large resorts, luxury hotels, and chains like NH Hotels and Riu. Carlito’s 0/5 rating is from just 3 reviews, lacking recent feedback and hotel segment data, making it less reliable.
The volume and recency of STAY reviews provide a more accurate picture of its performance and hotel satisfaction. Hoteliers consistently praise STAY’s impact on operational efficiency and guest experience.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Carlito’s pricing details are not publicly available, indicating a likely custom quote or enterprise pricing model. STAY charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no setup or implementation fees, making it transparent and predictable for hotel budgeting.
If your hotel requires a clear, straightforward pricing model, STAY’s flat fee simplifies financial planning. The lack of publicly available pricing for Carlito makes direct comparison difficult, but it suggests the platform might be tailored to larger or enterprise clients.
Carlito is suitable for small to medium resorts, boutique hotels, or properties looking to enhance guest communication without heavy infrastructure needs.
STAY is best for sizable hotels, chains, or properties committed to a digital transformation that impacts multiple operational areas.
Core Difference: Carlito focuses on personalized guest engagement with customizable features, while STAY offers a broad, integrated platform designed to digitize and streamline hotel operations.
When to choose Carlito: If your hotel seeks a flexible, easy-to-manage guest app primarily for boutique or resort settings, emphasizing guest personalization and cross-selling, Carlito’s simplicity and customization make it suitable.
When to choose STAY: If your hotel needs a proven, scalable solution that improves operational efficiency, reduces queues, and increases revenue across multiple departments, STAY’s extensive features and integrations stand out.
Final verdict: For most hotels with ambitions of digital transformation and operational impact, STAY is the more dependable, feature-rich solution backed by extensive recent reviews, higher ratings, and broader industry presence. Carlito may serve niche needs but currently lacks the scale and proven success to compete at a larger level.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Carlito App 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Carlito App 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Carlito App:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Carlito 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问