The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 224 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CiHMS 表现出色 在 ROI and onboarding 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping Mobile App.
myCloud Hospitality PMS 表现出色 在 支持团队 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 224 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 120 | 104 |
在分析了 224 条经验证的评价后,CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户友好性, 与 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
+
详细报告
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
−
系统缓慢
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | #14 67 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | #19 29 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | #27 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | #34 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | #16 48 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | #14 49 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | #12 35 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | #36 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #65 0 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #58 2 条评价 | #50 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | #7 93 条评价 |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both CiHMS by CiHMS and myCloud Hospitality PMS aim to streamline operations, but they serve different hotel profiles and come with varying features and support structures. As hoteliers, your goal is to find a platform that aligns with your property size, operational needs, and growth ambitions.
While CiHMS boasts a higher overall score and a larger review base, myCloud Hospitality PMS offers extensive integrations and modern features tailored for small to medium-sized hotels. What really sets the two apart, in the end, is the strength of recent reviews and user feedback.
CiHMS by CiHMS has a clear edge for hoteliers who prioritize a well-established system with a proven track record and a large, recent review base. Its high customer support ratings and extensive feature set for larger properties make it a strong choice for chains or resorts seeking comprehensive management.
myCloud Hospitality PMS, while slightly behind in review count and recency, excels with its seamless integrations, mobile-friendly features, and user-friendly interface. It suits small to medium-sized hotels aiming for modern, connected guest experiences. Given the data, CiHMS’s recent reviews and higher rating tip the scale in its favor.
Both systems aim to improve operational efficiency, but they do so with different strengths. CiHMS offers advanced room allocation, multi-channel integration, and robust reporting, ideal for larger hotels, resorts, and chains that need sophisticated management tools. myCloud PMS, with its extensive integrations and user-friendly design, targets small to mid-sized hotels looking to streamline operations and boost guest satisfaction through automation and connectivity.
If your hotel requires advanced revenue management and multi-property handling, CiHMS is the better choice. Conversely, if you want a flexible, easy-to-integrate platform with a focus on guest experience, myCloud PMS might serve you better.
Both products are highly rated for ease of use, with CiHMS scoring 4.9/5 and myCloud PMS just slightly behind at 4.79/5. CiHMS’s interface is described as intuitive, with many users appreciating its stability and straightforward navigation, though onboarding can be complex due to its feature breadth.
myCloud PMS receives praise for its smooth, user-friendly interface, with reviews highlighting how quickly new staff can learn the system and how easily reports and tasks are managed. The absence of a dedicated mobile app is a noted drawback for myCloud PMS.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers 33 shared features plus 2 unique ones, including a spa & wellness module and housekeeping mobile app, supporting comprehensive hotel management. myCloud PMS provides 28 unique features, notably including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, mobile keys, contactless check-in, and extensive integrations with OTAs and payment systems.
While both platforms cover core PMS functions, myCloud’s wide range of integrations and modern guest-focused features are impressive. However, CiHMS’s dedicated modules for wellness and housekeeping give it an edge in full-service hotel environments.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
Customer support and onboarding ratings favor CiHMS, with scores of 4.92/5 and 4.84/5, respectively. Reviews commend CiHMS’s professional, prompt support, especially during implementation and troubleshooting, with some users noting that support can resolve issues quickly.
myCloud PMS also earns praise for responsive customer service, with users describing their support team as helpful and quick to respond. Still, the sheer volume of recent reviews for CiHMS indicates a more consistently positive support experience.
Edge: CiHMS.
myCloud Hospitality PMS outshines with 29 verified integrations, including prominent OTAs like Booking.com, Agoda, and Expedia, plus payment gateways, CRM tools, and booking engines. CiHMS supports only 3 verified partners, sharing some with myCloud, but lacking the extensive third-party ecosystem.
For hotels seeking extensive connectivity with third-party tools and OTAs, myCloud PMS provides a more versatile ecosystem. If you only need basic integrations, CiHMS’s fewer options might suffice.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
CiHMS has a higher overall rating (0/5 from 101 reviews) compared to myCloud PMS’s 4.81/5 from 95 reviews. The sheer volume and recent reviews for myCloud indicate continued satisfaction among small to medium-sized hotels and boutique properties.
Large resorts and chain hotels tend to rate CiHMS higher, while boutique and independent hotels often favor myCloud for its ease of use and modern features. Overall, the more recent reviews for myCloud support its current effectiveness.
Edge: CiHMS, due to its higher review count and rating.
Both products are priced at a flat $900, with no mention of implementation fees or ongoing charges. Since pricing is straightforward, your decision hinges on features and support, not cost.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or has minimal management needs, as the system's complexity could be overwhelming.
Not ideal if your property requires customizations beyond the available integrations or if you need extensive wellness modules.
CiHMS provides a more established, feature-rich platform suited for larger, multi-property hotels or resorts. Its high customer support ratings, extensive modules, and proven track record make it the safer choice for complex management needs.
myCloud Hospitality PMS excels in integrations, modern features, and ease of use, making it ideal for smaller hotels wanting to modernize guest interactions and streamline operations. Its lower rating and review count suggest it’s better suited for properties prioritizing flexibility and connectivity.
If your hotel values reliability, advanced features, and a large, recent review base, CiHMS is the recommended choice. For innovative guest amenities, easy integrations, and a user-friendly experience, myCloud PMS could be more suitable.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CiHMS 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享 31 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然这不是一个独特的功能,但出色的客户支持是一个反复出现的主题。用户一致称赞支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,强调他们在迅速解决问题方面发挥的作用。
酒店经营者一致称赞 mycloud PMS 直观且用户友好的界面。这种易用性有助于快速培训员工并顺利开展日常运营,即使没有丰富技术知识的员工也能轻松使用。
用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增... 用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增加了收入机会。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论指出,缺乏移动应用程序是一个重大缺陷。用户表示需要一款移动应用程序来随时随地管理操作,他们认为这将进一步提高系统的灵活性和可用性。
有些用户报告称,mycloud PMS 偶尔会变慢,通常将其归因于互联网连接问题。虽然基于云的特性是有益的,但这也意味着系统的性能可能会受到网络速度的影响。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 提供 29 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。myCloud Hospitality PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,myCloud Hospitality PMS 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问