The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 84 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持,而 GraceSoft 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | #36 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | #31 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #17 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | #35 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | #32 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | #29 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | #24 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #33 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #12 4 条评价 | #17 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | #18 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right hotel management software depends on your hotel's specific needs, budget, and operational priorities. Both Clock HMS and GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. With Clock having a more established reputation backed by recent, extensive reviews, it offers a more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven performance. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s scale and aspirations?
Clock HMS by Clock is the more established and widely reviewed option, boasting over 60 recent reviews with an overall rating of 4.88/5 and a NPS score of 9.48/10. GraceSoft, while offering a lower price point and some core functionalities, has only 5 reviews with no recent feedback, making its reliability less clear. For a data-backed, proven solution, Clock is the clear winner.
Both products aim to help your team manage reservations, billing, and guest interactions more efficiently. Clock excels in providing a broad feature set, including integrated CRS, digital registration, guest app, and ancillary revenue tracking, which GraceSoft lacks. Conversely, GraceSoft focuses on straightforward reservation management, guest CRM, and native email marketing, but with fewer integrations and features. Given Clock’s recent reviews and higher overall ratings, it demonstrates a stronger track record, especially for hotels seeking comprehensive management. Are you looking for a full-featured PMS or a simpler reservation tool?
If your hotel needs a robust, all-in-one platform capable of handling complex operations and integrations, go with Clock. Its extensive features—such as digital registration, integrated ID scanner, and ancillary revenue modules—are ideal for mid-sized to larger properties aiming to boost revenue and operational efficiency. If budget constraints are your main concern and your property is small with straightforward needs, GraceSoft’s lower price point may appeal, but its limited features and lack of recent reviews reduce confidence. Do you prioritize deep functionality or simplicity?
Clock’s UI is rated 4.73/5 based on recent reviews, praised for being straightforward with quick access to essential functions, and its onboarding process is rated 4.71/5. Reviewers mention its intuitive navigation, which helps staff adopt the platform faster, despite initial setup complexity. GraceSoft’s system scores 4.4/5 for ease of use, with users highlighting its user-friendly design and excellent support team. However, its limited features and lack of recent feedback create a less clear picture of ongoing usability. Edge: Clock.
Clock offers 49 unique features, including revenue management, integrated CRS, rate shopping, digital registration, and ancillary revenue tracking—features absent in GraceSoft. GraceSoft provides essential reservation management, CRM, and native email marketing, totaling 30 features, but without the expanded functionality of Clock’s platform. For hoteliers seeking advanced automation and revenue tools, Clock clearly offers more. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s support scores 4.78/5, with reviewers praising its quick, knowledgeable assistance and consistent updates. Some mention the support team’s responsiveness mitigates initial setup challenges. GraceSoft’s customer support is rated 5/5, with reviews emphasizing its availability, courteousness, and helpfulness, especially for users with limited technical experience. While support quality appears excellent for both, Clock’s recent feedback indicates a slight edge in responsiveness and ongoing product evolution. Edge: Clock.
Clock boasts over 111 verified partners, including major OTAs and revenue management tools, offering extensive integration capabilities. GraceSoft has no verified partners listed, which limits its connectivity with external systems. If integrations are critical for your hotel's operations and revenue optimization, Clock’s ecosystem offers a significant advantage. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s recent reviews, totaling 63 with a 4.88/5 rating and a 95% likelihood to recommend, reflect strong satisfaction across property types, notably boutique hotels and independent properties. GraceSoft’s only five reviews, with no recent feedback, provide no reliable indication of current user satisfaction. Given the substantial recent review volume and high scores, Clock remains the more trusted option for hoteliers. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no freemium or trial options available. GraceSoft’s base price is $300 monthly, with a 30-day trial period. While Clock’s higher cost reflects its broader feature set and integrations, GraceSoft offers a more affordable entry point—though with limited features and support. Consider your budget and feature needs when choosing.
Clock HMS provides a proven, feature-rich platform backed by recent, positive reviews and extensive integrations, making it ideal for hotels seeking a comprehensive management solution. Its higher price is justified by capabilities that support revenue growth, operational efficiency, and scalable growth, especially for mid-sized properties. GraceSoft offers a more affordable, simple reservation system suited for small properties with basic needs, but its lack of recent reviews and limited integrations diminish confidence.
If your hotel demands reliability, extensive features, and proven performance, Clock is the clear choice. If budget and simplicity are your main concerns, GraceSoft may serve as a starting point, but with less confidence in ongoing support and capabilities. Ultimately, your decision should align with your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS:否。Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 79,GraceSoft 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问