The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 98 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and accessibility 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping Mobile App and Ancillary revenue tracking.
HotelFriend AG 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Revenue Management Module.
基于 HTR 上 98 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 79 | 19 |
在分析了 98 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持,而 HotelFriend AG 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 19 条评价 | #43 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 28 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #17 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #24 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 30 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | #41 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 15 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 11 条评价 | #31 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #25 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #12 4 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #18 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a hotel management system, your primary concern is finding a solution that simplifies operations, boosts revenue, and offers reliable support. Both Clock HMS by Clock and HotelFriend HMS aim to meet these needs but do so with different strengths. Clock’s extensive feature set, high user ratings, and recent reviews make it a more established choice for hoteliers seeking proven reliability and advanced integrations. HotelFriend offers a flexible, modular platform with a focus on compliance and customization, but its limited user feedback raises questions about maturity.
Are you prioritizing proven performance and extensive integrations, or seeking a highly customizable platform tailored to niche needs?
Both products aim to centralize hotel operations, streamline guest management, and improve revenue, but they approach this differently. Clock HMS provides an all-in-one cloud-based solution with a vast array of features, from reservations to analytics, designed for busy hotels needing a comprehensive tool. HotelFriend, on the other hand, offers a modular approach, allowing hotels to pick and choose specific functions like booking, POS, or event management, and is tailored for compliance-heavy markets such as Germany.
Clock has more recent reviews (7 in the last six months) and a significantly higher review count (63 reviews), indicating stronger market presence and ongoing updates. HotelFriend’s reviews are sparse and older, which may reflect less current user experience data.
In essence, Clock is better suited for hotels wanting a mature, highly-rated system with extensive integrations, while HotelFriend appeals to those seeking tailored modules and compliance adherence. Which type of platform aligns more closely with your hotel’s operational needs?
If your hotel needs a robust, all-in-one platform with proven reliability, go with Clock. Its core strengths are its extensive integrations—over 111 verified partners—and comprehensive feature set, including guest messaging, reservations, invoicing, and analytics. It’s especially suitable for hotels looking to improve operational efficiency and revenue through dynamic pricing and seamless OTA connections.
If your hotel requires a highly customizable, compliance-focused product, HotelFriend may be a better fit. It offers flexible modules like revenue management, native email marketing, and guest CRM, ideal for properties that want to tailor their system. However, its limited recent reviews and no verified integrations suggest it’s less mature.
For most hotels, especially those valuing proven performance and recent user feedback, Clock offers a safer, more transparent choice. Hotelier profiles seeking extensive features and integrations should lean toward Clock.
Clock’s user ratings indicate it is slightly easier to navigate, with a 4.73/5 ease-of-use score backed by recent reviews praising its straightforward interface. Users mention that onboarding can be complex initially, but the platform’s logical layout and comprehensive support mitigate this. The support team receives high marks, with many reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses.
HotelFriend’s usability scores 4.44/5, reflecting its modular design and customization options, which can introduce a learning curve for new users. Its interface may require more initial training, especially when configuring modules or managing compliance features.
Edge: Clock. Its more recent reviews and higher ratings suggest a smoother onboarding experience and easier daily operation.
Clock offers 42 shared features plus seven unique to its platform, including multi-currency support, housekeeper mobile app, rules-based room assignments, ancillary revenue tracking, PCI compliance, and SOC2 certification. Its comprehensive suite covers reservations, invoicing, online check-in, guest portals, and analytics, making it a well-rounded choice for busy hotels.
HotelFriend provides 42 shared features but adds eight unique modules, such as website development, native email marketing, revenue management, automated night audits, and guest CRM. Its modular design allows tailored solutions but may lack some advanced features found in Clock’s package.
Edge: Clock. Its extensive feature set, including security and compliance certifications, gives it an advantage for hotels needing a full, ready-to-use platform.
Clock’s support ratings (4.78/5) are higher than HotelFriend’s (4.56/5), with recent reviews praising its quick, effective assistance. Many users mention that Clock’s support team listens and responds promptly to complex issues, which is crucial during onboarding or troubleshooting.
HotelFriend’s support is rated slightly lower, but reviews indicate responsiveness and helpfulness. However, the limited number of recent reviews makes it harder to gauge current support quality reliably.
Edge: Clock. Its consistently higher ratings and more recent positive feedback point to a more dependable support experience.
Clock boasts 111 verified integration partners, including major OTAs, revenue management systems, and property investment apps, providing extensive connectivity options. Shared integrations with Clock include Curacity, Bookboost, and RevControl, among others.
HotelFriend does not list verified integrations publicly, indicating fewer or less established connections. While it offers basic channel and property management features, the lack of verified partners suggests it may be less flexible for hotels relying on multiple third-party systems.
Edge: Clock. Its mature, verified integration ecosystem gives it a clear advantage in operational flexibility.
Clock is rated 4.88/5 overall, based on 63 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and feature richness. Hotels of all sizes, especially boutique and city center properties, recommend it, citing improved efficiency and revenue.
HotelFriend’s ratings are not publicly available beyond a 0/5 overall score, and reviews are sparse and older. The limited feedback suggests it is less tested in the market, especially among diverse hotel types.
Therefore, Clock’s higher, recent ratings make it the more trusted choice for hoteliers seeking proven satisfaction.
Clock’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no free tier, implementation fees, or hidden costs. Its flat monthly fee covers all core features, making budgeting straightforward.
HotelFriend’s base price is $800 per month, also without free options or setup fees. Its modular approach may incur additional costs depending on selected modules, which aren’t detailed publicly.
Overall, Clock’s lower, transparent pricing and all-inclusive approach offer better value for hotels seeking predictable expenses.
Not ideal if your property has very specific, niche requirements that don’t align with Clock’s broad feature set or if you prefer a highly modular, customizable platform.
Not ideal if you require a system with extensive verified integrations or proven market presence, or if your operation demands a highly tested, mature platform.
Clock HMS offers a highly-rated, feature-rich platform with proven reliability, extensive integrations, and recent positive reviews from a broad range of hotel segments. Its core strengths include better support, lower cost, and a comprehensive suite suited for hotels aiming to maximize operational efficiency and revenue.
HotelFriend provides a modular, compliance-oriented system designed for customization and market-specific needs. While it offers tailored solutions, the limited recent feedback and fewer integrations make it less suitable for hotels prioritizing stability and proven performance.
For most hotels, especially those seeking a trusted, market-tested solution, Clock HMS stands out as the clearer choice. If your operation demands extensive customization and compliance, and you’re prepared to navigate a less mature platform, HotelFriend could be considered—but with caution.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock HMS 和 HotelFriend HMS 共享 42 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock HMS 和 HotelFriend HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock HMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelFriend HMS 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock HMS:否。HotelFriend HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 79,HotelFriend AG 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问