The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 354 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 功能丰富 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
GuestPoint 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and On premise.
基于 HTR 上 354 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 328 | 26 |
在分析了 354 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新,而 GuestPoint 用户则强调 客户支持, 用户友好性, 预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
−
界面导航问题
▾
|
|
−
内部管理报告
▾
|
|
|
−
网上预订更新
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #29 23 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #54 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #39 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #57 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #41 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #25 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs to consider how well each solution simplifies operations, supports growth, and enhances the guest experience. Clock PMS by Clock and GuestPoint PMS both aim to streamline workflows, but they diverge significantly in scale, feature set, and user feedback. Clock offers a more comprehensive platform with a larger global presence and stronger reviews, while GuestPoint is leaner, focusing on ease of use and customer support. Which aligns better with your hotel's needs?
Both Clock and GuestPoint aim to centralize hotel operations, from reservations to invoicing, but they do so with different strengths. Clock’s cloud-based platform includes extensive features like multi-currency, guest CRM, digital registration, and integrated ID scanning, making it suitable for hotels seeking an all-in-one enterprise tool. GuestPoint emphasizes simple reservation management, channel integration, and robust guest services, which may appeal to smaller or mid-sized properties.
Clock enjoys a higher rating (4.8/5) based on 251 reviews, with more recent feedback reinforcing its reliability and feature depth. GuestPoint, with only 25 reviews, lacks recent data and has a minimal rating of 0/5, which limits its credibility. Are you more interested in a mature, well-reviewed platform, or a lighter, straightforward solution?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, feature-rich system capable of managing multiple properties, currencies, and complex workflows, Clock is the clear choice. It’s better suited for hotels with larger operations, multiple revenue streams, or those pursuing automation and integration.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes simplicity, affordability, and exceptional customer support, GuestPoint might be more appropriate. Its user-friendly interface and focus on core reservation and guest management make it ideal for small to mid-sized properties with less complex needs.
Given the review data, Clock’s larger user base and recent positive feedback make it the more reliable pick for most hotels seeking a robust PMS. GuestPoint’s limited review history and lower overall ratings suggest caution unless your hotel values straightforward support and quick onboarding above all.
Clock PMS has a high ease-of-use rating (4.78/5) and is praised for its intuitive interface that simplifies training for new staff. Users report that Clock reduces administrative workload and speeds up onboarding, though some find the extensive features overwhelming initially.
GuestPoint scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its straightforward, user-friendly design and efficient onboarding process. Support from GuestPoint's team is also frequently praised, making it easier for smaller teams to adapt quickly.
Edge: GuestPoint.
Clock’s feature set exceeds GuestPoint’s significantly, with 42 shared features and 16 exclusive to Clock. Notable features unique to Clock include multi-currency support, guest CRM, digital registration, integrated ID scanners, online check-in, and GDPR compliance, making it a full-suite management tool.
GuestPoint offers only 2 features exclusive to it: guest communication via SMS and on-premise solutions, which are more limited compared to Clock’s extensive capabilities. With its broader feature set, Clock outperforms GuestPoint in versatility and automation.
Edge: Clock.
Clock’s support rating of 4.75/5 and recent reviews attest to its responsive, knowledgeable customer service. Users frequently mention prompt assistance, regular updates, and support that contributes to smooth operations, though some note occasional issues with error messages and reporting delays.
GuestPoint also scores a perfect 5/5 for support, with reviews praising its 24/7 availability, helpful staff, and strong relationships. Its smaller user base means more personalized attention, but the limited review data makes it harder to assess consistency.
Edge: GuestPoint.
Clock boasts 111 verified partner integrations, including industry staples like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Booking.com, with 3 shared partners. Its extensive API and broad integration options allow for customized setups and seamless third-party connections, crucial for larger or tech-savvy hotels.
GuestPoint has only 7 verified partners, including SiteMinder and Stripe, and shares 3 integrations with Clock. Its limited integration options might constrain hotels that rely on diverse or complex systems.
Edge: Clock.
Clock’s reviews are highly favorable, with a 4.8/5 rating based on 251 reviews, mostly from independent and boutique hotels. Recent feedback confirms high satisfaction, especially for its operational efficiency and extensive features.
GuestPoint’s limited reviews and 0/5 rating hinder a clear comparison, but the few comments highlight satisfaction with support and ease of use. The lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence in its current performance.
Edge: Clock.
Clock’s pricing starts at $600 per month, reflecting its extensive features, while GuestPoint offers a lower base price of $200 per month. Neither platform lists additional fees, but Clock’s higher cost correlates with its broader capabilities and enterprise focus.
Your decision may depend on budget and desired functionality. If budget is tight, GuestPoint might seem attractive, but the lack of recent reviews and lower ratings suggest it may not deliver consistent value.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, has simple reservation needs, or prefers a lower-cost, straightforward system.
Not ideal if your hotel requires complex workflows, extensive automation, or advanced integrations.
Clock PMS offers an extensive, feature-rich platform trusted by hundreds of properties worldwide, with a strong track record and recent positive reviews. Its broad integration network, advanced capabilities, and high user ratings make it suitable for hotels that need a robust, scalable system.
GuestPoint appeals to smaller properties or those new to PMS, emphasizing simplicity, excellent support, and affordability. However, its limited reviews and lower ratings suggest it may struggle to keep pace with more established solutions like Clock.
For most hotels seeking a dependable, full-featured PMS with proven performance, Clock is the safer, more strategic choice. GuestPoint may fulfill niche needs but should be considered carefully given the limited recent data.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock PMS 和 GuestPoint PMS 共享 42 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
GuestPoint 提供的卓越客户支持一再被强调。支持团队全天候提供服务,知识渊博、耐心且能快速解决问题,这有助于保持平稳运营。
GuestPoint 因其直观的设计和用户友好的界面而广受好评,即使是新员工也可以轻松学习和使用。培训很简单,大多数用户发现它比旧系统有了显著的改进。
预订系统可有效防止超额预订并简化多间客房预订。用户对系统在轻松管理客房库存和预订方面的可靠性表示赞赏。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了界面某些导航方面存在的挑战,例如搜索选项和快速更新,他们认为可以使其更加直观。
一些评论表明,虽然 GuestPoint 总体上是高效的,但可以改进内部管理报告,以便更好地管理工作流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 GuestPoint PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GuestPoint PMS 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GuestPoint PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。GuestPoint PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,GuestPoint 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问