The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 400 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
GuestPoint 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Native Email Marketing.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 smooth transition and training 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Lobby Kiosk.
基于 HTR 上 400 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $200/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 26 | 374 |
在分析了 400 条经验证的评价后,GuestPoint 用户最看重其 客户支持, 用户友好性, 预订管理,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 smooth transition and training, user experience and interface, 客房服务和运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
Smooth Transition and Training
▾
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
+
User Experience and Interface
▾
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
+
客房服务和运营效率
▾
|
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
+
预订和价格管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
界面导航问题
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
内部管理报告
▾
|
−
有限公司和发票管理
▾
|
|
−
网上预订更新
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #29 23 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #54 2 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #39 11 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #57 1 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #41 4 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #25 6 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing between GuestPoint PMS and Stayntouch involves weighing their core strengths and recent performance. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approach, features, pricing, and market presence differ significantly. Your decision should hinge on specific needs like hotel size, operational complexity, and budget constraints.
GuestPoint, with its Australian roots and a focus on small to medium motels, emphasizes simplicity, affordability, and integrated services. Stayntouch, a US-based provider, caters to larger, multi-property operations with a focus on mobile, automation, and extensive third-party integrations. Which aligns better with your hotel's goals?
GuestPoint is a cloud-based PMS designed for small to medium-sized properties, particularly motels and boutique hotels, offering a user-friendly interface and comprehensive suite of features. Stayntouch targets larger hotels and chains, providing advanced multi-property management, extensive integrations, and mobile functionalities.
While GuestPoint's strengths lie in simplicity and affordability, Stayntouch excels in scalability and technological innovation. Your choice depends on whether your hotel prioritizes ease of use or extensive capabilities. Are you seeking a straightforward system or one that supports growth and complex operations?
If your hotel needs a PMS that manages multiple properties seamlessly, offers contactless check-in, and integrates deeply with third-party systems, Stayntouch is the clear winner. Its extensive integrations and mobile features make it suitable for larger operations and tech-forward brands.
Conversely, if your hotel is a small to mid-sized motel or boutique, seeking an affordable, easy-to-learn system with robust customer support, GuestPoint should be your pick. Its lower price point and focus on core hotel functions make it ideal for budget-conscious properties with straightforward needs.
GuestPoint garners a perfect 5/5 rating for ease of use, praised for its intuitive, straightforward interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training. Support staff also highlight its simplicity, making staff adoption smooth, even for those with limited technical skills.
Stayntouch’s user-friendly interface scores 4.7/5, with reviews emphasizing its visual clarity and ease of navigation. Training is effective, and staff quickly adapt to the cloud-based system, though some users mention the speed of certain operations could improve.
Edge: GuestPoint.
GuestPoint offers five features exclusive to its platform, including on-premise deployment, native email marketing, gift vouchers, automated reminders, and integrated POS—features suited for smaller properties with specific needs. Stayntouch boasts ten unique features, such as multi-lingual support, integrated ID/passport scanners, kiosk check-in, online checkout, and GDPR compliance—features that enable larger, multi-property properties to operate efficiently.
Both platforms share 39 core features, but Stayntouch’s extensive third-party integrations and advanced functionalities give it an edge for complex operations.
Edge: Stayntouch.
GuestPoint’s support scores a perfect 5/5, with reviews consistently praising its 24/7 availability, knowledgeable staff, and quick resolution times. Users describe their support as “exceptional” and “helpful from onboarding through daily operations.”
Stayntouch also delivers high support ratings at 4.68/5, with users commending the onboarding process and availability of support. Some reviews mention occasional delays in addressing complex issues, but overall, support is regarded as responsive and helpful.
Edge: GuestPoint.
Stayntouch’s integration count is significantly higher, with 188 verified partners, including major players like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and Zaplox. GuestPoint integrates with seven verified partners, including STAAH, SiteMinder, and Stripe, and offers three shared partners.
For properties relying heavily on third-party systems, Stayntouch provides broader connectivity and flexibility. Its open API approach facilitates seamless integrations across a wide range of solutions.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch is rated 4.56/5 overall by hotel users, with the bulk of recent reviews (26 in the last six months) praising its ease of use, extensive features, and support. Its primary user segments include boutique hotels, branded properties, resorts, and chain hotels, with ratings averaging above 4.5/5, reflecting high satisfaction.
GuestPoint’s reviews, on the other hand, are limited (only 25 reviews, all older than six months), and the overall rating is 0/5, indicating a lack of recent, verified feedback. Due to this, Stayntouch is clearly the more favorably rated product today.
Edge: Stayntouch.
GuestPoint charges a flat $200 monthly fee, with no implementation, setup, or trial fees, making it an affordable choice for small properties. Stayntouch’s base price is $800 per month, with no mention of implementation or trial options, positioning it as a premium solution suited for larger hotels.
Cost considerations should factor in property size and complexity; smaller hotels will find GuestPoint more budget-friendly, while larger chains may find value in Stayntouch’s extensive features.
Hotels that should consider GuestPoint are:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that should consider Stayntouch are:
Not ideal if:
Stayntouch leads in scalability, integration, and recent reviews, making it ideal for larger, multi-property hotels and chains aiming for automation and guest engagement. GuestPoint offers a more affordable, easy-to-use solution tailored for small to mid-sized motels and boutique hotels that prioritize simplicity and dedicated support.
Choose GuestPoint if your hotel’s focus is on core functionalities with minimal complexity. Opt for Stayntouch if you require extensive integrations, mobile capabilities, and multi-property management—especially if your property is growing or part of a chain.
In conclusion, the decision hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and budget. For most larger, multi-property hotels, Stayntouch presents a more recent and highly-rated option. Smaller properties will find GuestPoint’s straightforward approach and support more aligned with their needs.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,GuestPoint PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享 39 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
GuestPoint 提供的卓越客户支持一再被强调。支持团队全天候提供服务,知识渊博、耐心且能快速解决问题,这有助于保持平稳运营。
GuestPoint 因其直观的设计和用户友好的界面而广受好评,即使是新员工也可以轻松学习和使用。培训很简单,大多数用户发现它比旧系统有了显著的改进。
预订系统可有效防止超额预订并简化多间客房预订。用户对系统在轻松管理客房库存和预订方面的可靠性表示赞赏。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了界面某些导航方面存在的挑战,例如搜索选项和快速更新,他们认为可以使其更加直观。
一些评论表明,虽然 GuestPoint 总体上是高效的,但可以改进内部管理报告,以便更好地管理工作流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Stayntouch receives high praise for its seamless transition and training processes, greatly aided by trainers like David and Julia, who are consistent... Stayntouch receives high praise for its seamless transition and training processes, greatly aided by trainers like David and Julia, who are consistently mentioned for their support and comprehensive guidance. Many reviews highlight the ease of moving from previous systems, an aspect noted particularly for its stress-reduction during onboarding.
The software is largely favored for its intuitive and user-friendly design, supporting efficient training and ease of user adoption, especially for st... The software is largely favored for its intuitive and user-friendly design, supporting efficient training and ease of user adoption, especially for staff with varying technical proficiencies. This contributes significantly to positive front-desk and operational performances.
Stayntouch的客房管理功能因其简化房间分配和跟踪客房服务状态而备受赞誉。这些功能通过提供实时更新来提升运营效率,从而优化日常工作流程。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然报告功能因其全面性和有助于运营监督而受到赞赏,但多项评论指出,报告的自定义程度和清晰度仍有提升空间。生成详细报告方面的困难也成为部分用户遇到的难题... 虽然报告功能因其全面性和有助于运营监督而受到赞赏,但多项评论指出,报告的自定义程度和清晰度仍有提升空间。生成详细报告方面的困难也成为部分用户遇到的难题。
一些评论指出,在管理团体预订和开票方面存在困难,并指出某些流程可以更加精简和直观。客户账户转移和历史数据访问方面的问题也表明,该功能仍有扩展空间。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GuestPoint PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。GuestPoint PMS 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 192 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GuestPoint PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GuestPoint PMS:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GuestPoint 的 HT Score 为 16,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案