The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 386 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles.
Maestro PMS 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (3.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 386 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 328 | 58 |
在分析了 386 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and intuitive design, 预订和客房管理, 集成与自动化,而 Maestro PMS 用户则强调 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能, 培训和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Design
▾
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
|
+
预订和客房管理
▾
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
|
+
培训和入职
▾
|
+
与其他系统集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能更新和可用性
▾
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
−
连接性和同步性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #41 7 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #18 35 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #12 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #10 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #25 26 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #20 31 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #38 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #38 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #12 53 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is a critical step for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Clock PMS and Maestro PMS aim to streamline your daily workflows, but they cater to different hotel profiles and needs. Clock PMS excels in simplicity, ease of use, and recent positive reviews, while Maestro PMS offers extensive customization and a long-standing reputation. Which one best aligns with your hotel’s specific needs?
The decision ultimately hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans. Are you prioritizing ease of operation and quick onboarding or seeking a highly customizable, multi-module platform? Let’s examine how these solutions compare across key factors.
Both Clock PMS and Maestro PMS address core hotel management challenges—reservations, guest communication, invoicing, and integration with OTAs. Clock PMS, with its modern, all-in-one cloud approach, aims to simplify daily operations for busy-hotels, especially independent or boutique properties. Maestro PMS, with over 45 years of experience, offers a flexible, modular system designed for properties needing deep customization, multi-property support, or comprehensive modules like spa and event management.
Clock PMS’s focus on intuitive design and recent reviews mean your team can start using it quickly, benefiting from high satisfaction scores. Maestro, while robust, has a steeper learning curve and fewer recent reviews, which might impact support responsiveness. Are you leaning toward an easy-to-adopt solution or a customizable platform tailored to complex operations?
If your hotel needs straightforward, quick-to-implement software that covers reservations, rates, invoicing, and guest messaging, go with Clock PMS. Its user-friendly interface and recent stellar reviews (4.8/5 based on 251 reviews, with recent activity) make it ideal for boutique, city-center, or independent hotels aiming for operational efficiency.
If you require a highly configurable system with a broad set of modules—such as spa, sales & catering, or multi-property management—Maestro PMS is your choice. Its extensive feature set and proven support (rated 4.36/5 from fewer recent reviews) suit large resorts or hotels with complex needs. For properties prioritizing rapid onboarding and ease of use, Clock is better; for detailed customization and integration, Maestro wins.
Clock PMS shines with a high ease of use rating (4.78/5 from 251 reviews), reflecting a modern, intuitive interface. Users highlight its simple onboarding, quick training, and straightforward workflows, making staff adoption seamless even for new employees. Recent reviews emphasize how it reduces training time and streamlines daily tasks.
Maestro PMS’s ease of use is rated lower (4.04/5 from 56 reviews), with feedback pointing to a somewhat dated UI and a steeper learning curve. Users mention that navigating modules can be cumbersome, especially for new staff, and that support, while reliable, sometimes involves multiple clicks to perform tasks.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 54 shared features plus four exclusive to it, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, guest profiles, and gift vouchers. It integrates guest messaging, online check-in, restaurant POS, and automation tools, making it a comprehensive, all-in-one solution.
Maestro PMS shares the core features but adds modules such as spa & wellness, mobile notes, and guest communication via SMS, totaling over 20 integrated modules. Its unique features include touchless and mobile apps, and a strong focus on direct bookings.
Clock’s feature set is more recent and streamlined, with a focus on automation and guest engagement. Maestro’s extensive modules suit properties that need deep customization and specialized operations.
Edge: Clock PMS—more recent, user-friendly, and feature-rich for general hotel needs.
Clock PMS’s support rating (4.75/5 from 251 reviews) reflects highly responsive customer service, praised for timely assistance and ongoing updates. Hoteliers report quick problem resolution and appreciation for their proactive communication.
Maestro PMS’s customer support (4.78/5 from 56 reviews) is also highly rated, with many users praising their 24/7 support and knowledgeable staff. However, fewer recent reviews mean less current feedback on responsiveness.
Given the recent reviews and higher review volume, Clock PMS’s support is the more reliable choice.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts 111 verified partners, including key integrations with Booking.com, Triptease, and Profitroom, plus exclusive integrations like Flexipass and Spotpilot. Its open API and lack of connection fees make it flexible for future integrations.
Maestro PMS has 89 verified partners, with integrations including QuickBooks, Zaplox, and Nonius. It also offers extensive modules for on-premise and contactless solutions but fewer third-party integrations overall.
Clock’s broader and more recent partner network provides greater flexibility and future-proofing.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s recent review volume (251 reviews in the last six months) yields an overall rating of 4.8/5, with a high likelihood to recommend (95%) and an NPS of 9.47/10. Independent and boutique hotels rate it particularly highly, citing ease of use and operational improvements.
Maestro PMS’s fewer recent reviews (none in the last six months) lower its overall score to 4.36/5, with an 88% recommendation rate. Resorts and larger properties tend to rate it higher, appreciating its customization but noting UI and reporting issues.
Given the recent reviews and higher scores, Clock PMS is the preferred option.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers a transparent base price of $600, with no hidden fees, freemium options, or implementation costs. Its flat monthly fee makes budgeting predictable.
Maestro PMS’s base cost is $900, with no mention of hidden costs or implementation fees. Its higher price reflects its broader module set and on-premise options, which may benefit larger properties but increase initial investment.
For budget-conscious hotels seeking value, Clock PMS’s lower, clear pricing is advantageous.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization, multi-property management, or spa & wellness modules.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or prefers a simple, user-friendly system.
Clock PMS is a modern, straightforward solution best suited for independent hotels, boutique properties, and hotels seeking quick deployment. Its high ratings, recent reviews, and ease of use make it ideal for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency and guest engagement.
Maestro PMS offers extensive customization and modules for larger, complex properties or multi-property groups. Its long-standing presence and robust feature set appeal to hotels with diverse operational needs, but it may require more staff training and a steeper learning curve.
If your hotel values simplicity, recent positive feedback, and quick implementation, choose Clock PMS. For advanced customization and multi-module management, Maestro PMS remains a solid, albeit more complex, option.
Our Verdict:
For most independent or boutique hotels looking for a user-friendly, well-supported platform with recent positive reviews, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its higher ratings, more recent reviews, and broader integration network make it the better fit in today’s competitive landscape.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees... Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees and enhances operational efficiency. The software's straightforward navigation and learnability make it ideal for fast-paced environments.
评论者经常提到,Clock PMS+ 提供了高效的预订和客房管理工具。它将预订、客房管理和宾客沟通等各种运营环节整合到一个平台上,从而节省时间并减少错误。
用户非常欣赏 Clock PMS+ 的广泛集成和自动化功能,它可以与其他系统无缝连接,节省重复性任务的时间,并增强日常运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好... 一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好地适应这些更新。
一些用户指出,虽然 Clock PMS+ 提供了全面的报告,但在数据收集和呈现方式方面仍有改进的空间,这可以增强收入管理和战略规划。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 提供 89 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Maestro PMS (Northwind):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 88,Maestro PMS 的为 70。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案