The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #48 5 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #67 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #54 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #62 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #49 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #48 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #15 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and growth. Both Clock PMS and Prostay aim to streamline operations, but their origins, features, and market presence differ substantially. Clock offers a well-established, comprehensive cloud-based platform with extensive integrations and a focus on automating day-to-day tasks. Prostay, a newer entrant, emphasizes versatility with both cloud and on-premise options, supporting large multi-property portfolios and including a proprietary POS system. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Clock PMS and Prostay both address core hotel management challenges—reservations, guest communication, billing, and operations. Clock’s strength lies in its full-featured, cloud-based ecosystem trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, supported by a large user base and recent positive reviews. Prostay, with just a handful of reviews, remains less proven but offers multi-property support and offline capabilities. While Clock’s recent reviews are plentiful and current, Prostay’s limited data makes it harder to assess stability. Are you prioritizing proven reliability and extensive integrations?
If your hotel needs a mature, widely adopted PMS with seamless API integrations, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its 251 reviews and a high rating of 4.8/5 over the past six months reflect strong user satisfaction, especially among boutique and city-center hotels. On the other hand, if you operate a large resort or multiple properties and require the flexibility of on-premise deployment with a built-in POS, Prostay could suit you better—though its limited reviews mean less confidence in stability.
For boutique and independent hotels seeking cloud-based ease, Clock is usually the better fit. If managing a high-volume resort or multiple properties with a need for offline operation, Prostay’s multi-platform support makes it worth considering. Is your focus on a proven solution with extensive support or a flexible platform tailored for larger, multi-site operations?
Clock PMS garners a 4.78/5 rating for ease of use, bolstered by numerous reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple training, and quick onboarding. Hoteliers highlight its user-friendly design, which simplifies staff training and daily operations, especially in busy environments. Prostay, with a 4.8/5 rating, is also praised for its user-friendly experience, with reviewers emphasizing its logical flows and straightforward setup, even for complex multi-property management.
Both systems are highly rated for ease of use, but Clock’s longer market presence and broader user feedback provide a slight edge. If quick staff onboarding and a familiar digital experience are top priorities, Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 23 features unique to its platform, including guest profiles, group functionality, multi-currency, guest app, online check-in/out, integrated ID scanners, and automated night audits. Its 35 shared features and extensive automation capabilities give it an edge for hotels seeking a thorough, all-in-one solution.
Prostay provides fewer unique features—mainly its on-premise option and a dedicated spa & wellness module—yet it includes core reservation, housekeeping, billing, and channel management tools. If your hotel requires advanced automation, guest engagement tools, and extensive integrations, Clock’s feature set is superior. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s reviews highlight a 4.75/5 support rating, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness, ongoing updates, and helpful onboarding. Review quotes mention “very quick responses” and “responsive support staff,” which help resolve issues efficiently and maintain system reliability.
Prostay’s rating is a perfect 5/5, with limited reviews but very positive sentiments about support. However, the smaller user base and fewer recent reviews make it difficult to gauge the consistency of support. Given Clock’s larger, more active community and recent review volume, Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts a verified partner network of 111 integrations, including major players like Stripe, RevControl, and Bookboost. Its open API and connection fees-free approach make it highly adaptable to complex tech stacks.
Prostay’s integration options are minimal, with only two verified partners—shared with Clock and one exclusive to Prostay. This limited connectivity could be restrictive as your hotel’s tech needs grow. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s recent reviews in the last six months, with a 4.8/5 score, reflect high satisfaction among boutique, city-center, and B&B hotels. Hotel owners commend its ease of use, automation, and support, with one review stating, “Switching to Clock has made our work much easier.”
Prostay’s review count and data are insufficient for a broad rating analysis, but the existing feedback indicates a positive user experience. Given Clock’s larger, recent review base, it’s the more trusted choice. Edge: Clock PMS.
Both Clock PMS and Prostay are priced at $600 per month, with no upfront implementation or hidden fees. Their pricing models are similar, making cost less of a differentiator.
If budget is your only concern, both systems offer comparable rates, but consider the long-term value based on features, support, and market presence rather than initial costs.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on on-premise solutions or requires a niche feature like a spa module (which Clock does not offer).
Not ideal if you prioritize a mature, widely adopted cloud solution with extensive third-party integrations—Prostay’s ecosystem is limited.
Clock PMS is an established, feature-rich platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide. It offers a broad suite of automation, integrations, and support that align with industry needs, especially for boutique and independent hotels.
Prostay, with its hybrid deployment options and specialized modules, suits larger resorts or multi-property portfolios that require flexibility and offline capabilities. However, the limited review data makes it a less proven choice for hoteliers seeking reliability.
If your hotel values proven stability, extensive integrations, and a large user community, Clock PMS is the clear winner. Choose Prostay if you need on-premise support and a flexible platform for large, complex operations—though confirm its performance through pilot testing first.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Prostay 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Prostay 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Prostay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,Prostay 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问