The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's daily operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both Clock PMS by Clock and Tesipro by Tesipro aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve different segments and priorities. Clock's comprehensive suite addresses a wide range of operational needs with extensive features and a large user base, while Tesipro offers a more straightforward setup ideal for independent hotels and large chains. Which one aligns better with your hotel's current needs?
Clock PMS has established itself as a leading PMS with a strong market presence and over 251 recent reviews, giving it a high confidence score of 84.0 out of 100. It offers a broad set of features—42 in total—with 16 exclusive to Clock—covering reservations, rates, invoicing, housekeeping, guest messaging, and even revenue management modules. Tesipro, by comparison, has no recent reviews and a score of zero, suggesting limited current adoption and user feedback.
Clock’s recent reviews praise its ease of use, operational efficiency, and extensive integration options, making it a preferred choice for hotels looking for a full-featured system. Meanwhile, Tesipro’s limited feedback and no recent reviews imply less validation from the market. If your hotel requires a proven, feature-rich PMS with ongoing support, Clock is the clear leader.
If your hotel needs a platform capable of managing complex operations, integrating with over 111 partner systems, and offering advanced features like revenue management, guest CRM, and multi-lingual support, Clock PMS is the better fit. Its extensive feature set and proven global presence are ideal for hotels seeking operational automation and guest engagement tools.
Conversely, if your hotel is a large independent property or part of a chain that values quick setup, basic integration, and a reliable core management system without the need for extensive add-ons, Tesipro could be sufficient. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited feature detail suggest that Clock offers a more validated and evolving solution for most hotels.
Clock PMS scores a 4.78 out of 5 for ease of use, with users citing its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and straightforward staff training. Reviewers highlight how Clock simplifies complex operations, reducing time spent on administrative tasks and making it easier for staff to learn the system.
In contrast, Tesipro has no publicly available recent ratings or reviews, making it difficult to assess its usability. Given Clock’s proven high ease-of-use score supported by multiple user reviews, it is the safer choice for hotels prioritizing user-friendly operation.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS shines with a total of 42 features, including 16 exclusive ones such as revenue management, ancillary revenue tracking, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, guest CRM, native email marketing, drag-and-drop tapechart, rules-based room assignments, and automated reminders. These features support complex management needs and enhance revenue opportunities.
Tesipro offers only core features, with 2 exclusives—guest CRM and a spa & wellness module—but lacks the breadth and depth of Clock’s feature set. The limited feature count makes it less suitable for hotels requiring comprehensive management tools.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS enjoys high support ratings, with a 4.75 out of 5 score and recent reviews praising its quick, responsive, and helpful customer service. Hoteliers appreciate the proactive support team and regular system updates that improve reliability and functionality.
Tesipro has no recent feedback or reviews indicating its support quality. Given Clock’s demonstrated customer support excellence, it remains the more dependable choice.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, RateGain, IDeaS, and D-Edge, offering extensive connectivity for different hotel needs. Only 15 systems are shared with Tesipro; the rest are unique to Clock, providing broader options for automation, revenue management, and distribution.
Tesipro’s 25 verified integrations are fewer, with some notable providers like GuestCentric and Nonius, but it lacks the extensive ecosystem Clock offers. Hotels needing diverse and reliable integration options will find Clock more suited.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s user base includes a broad mix of independent, boutique, and city-center hotels, with an overall rating of 4.8/5 based on 251 reviews. Recent feedback highlights its ease of use, operational efficiency, and excellent support, especially praised by hotels managing multiple properties or complex operations.
Tesipro has no recent reviews, so no reliable ratings or feedback are available. The high volume and recency of Clock’s reviews favor it as the more trusted, highly-rated system in the market.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no freemium, implementation fees, or additional charges. Its transparent flat-rate model makes budgeting predictable for most hotels.
Tesipro’s base price is $1,300 per month, also with no trial or hidden fees. While more expensive, it offers fewer features, making it less cost-effective for hotels needing extensive management tools.
Clock PMS is a comprehensive, feature-rich solution proven by a large user base, high ratings, and recent reviews. Its extensive integrations, automation, and support make it suitable for hotels seeking a robust management platform, especially those with complex operations.
Tesipro, while tailored for independent and large hotels, lacks recent validation through reviews and offers fewer features. Its simpler setup and lower cost might appeal to hotels with basic needs, but the absence of recent user feedback diminishes confidence.
If your hotel demands a proven, versatile PMS with ongoing support and regular updates, Clock PMS is the clear choice. For properties with straightforward management needs and a focus on quick deployment, Tesipro could suffice—but consider the lack of recent reviews before making your decision.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Tesipro 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Tesipro 提供 25 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Tesipro:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,Tesipro 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问