Cloudbeds HMS vs. GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 July 1, 2026  ·  已分析 1,439 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,439 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and staff adoption 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.

GraceSoft 表现出色 在 customer support and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Native Email Marketing.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Cloudbeds HMS 与 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,439 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
100
0
推荐可能性
91%
86%
易用性
4.6/5
4.6/5
客户支持
4.4/5
5.0/5
性价比
4.3/5
4.6/5
起始价格 From $500/mo From $300/mo
经验证的评价 1,431 8

Cloudbeds HMS 与 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,439 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 ease of use and staff adoption, reservations and booking flexibility, 客户支持和入职协助,而 GraceSoft 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds GraceSoft GraceSoft
优点
+ Ease of use and staff adoption
+ Reservations and booking flexibility
+ 客户支持和入职协助
+ 信道管理和OTA同步
缺点
报告和分析
性能、稳定性和漏洞
客户沟通和客户关系管理

Cloudbeds 对比 GraceSoft:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds GraceSoft GraceSoft
小型(10-24 间客房) #2 675 条评价 #36 3 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #1 235 条评价 #31 2 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #1 51 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #4 5 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds GraceSoft GraceSoft
精品酒店 #1 546 条评价 #35 2 条评价
豪华酒店 #3 245 条评价 #32 3 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #2 145 条评价 #29 2 条评价
长住酒店 #2 96 条评价 #34 0 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds GraceSoft GraceSoft
北美 #2 532 条评价 #24 1 条评价
欧洲 #4 166 条评价 #33 1 条评价
亚太 #3 201 条评价 #17 2 条评价
中东 #3 13 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Easy Innkeeping depends on your hotel’s specific needs, tech infrastructure, and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds offers a fully integrated, scalable platform that connects operations, revenue, and distribution in one system, whereas Easy Innkeeping focuses on streamlining reservations and guest communications with straightforward features. How do you balance comprehensive functionality with ease of use, and which platform aligns better with your operational scale?

Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set and large review base make it the more proven choice, especially for properties seeking growth and automation. Easy Innkeeping’s simpler approach may suit smaller properties prioritizing straightforward reservation management. Are you prepared to invest in a versatile, future-ready system, or do you need a more focused solution for immediate operational efficiency?

Is Cloudbeds or Easy Innkeeping Better for Hotels?

Cloudbeds and Easy Innkeeping both aim to simplify hotel management, but they cater to different hotel profiles. Cloudbeds is designed to serve properties looking for a unified platform that handles reservations, channel management, revenue optimization, and guest experience, supporting a wide range of property types and sizes. Easy Innkeeping is more suited for small to midsized properties, inns, or vacation rentals that prioritize reservation handling and direct booking facilitation without extensive additional features.

Where Cloudbeds excels with over 1,200 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 overall score, it’s clearly the industry’s favored solution, especially for properties planning to scale. Easy Innkeeping, with just 5 reviews and a 0/5 score, lacks recent customer feedback—making it difficult to assess reliability or ongoing support. Do you want a platform with proven market presence and ongoing innovation, or one still seeking validation?

Cloudbeds vs Easy Innkeeping: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable system that integrates PMS, channel management, revenue tools, and guest engagement, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its platform supports properties of all sizes, particularly those aiming for automation, data-driven decision-making, and growth into new markets.

If your hotel primarily requires reservation management, basic guest communication, and simple OTA integration, Easy Innkeeping might suffice. However, given its limited reviews and recent data, Cloudbeds’s broad feature set, extensive integrations, and proven track record make it a more reliable long-term investment. Are you seeking a system that can grow with your hotel, or do you prefer a straightforward, entry-level solution?

Is Cloudbeds or Easy Innkeeping Easier to Use?

Cloudbeds’s user interface scores 4.58/5, praised for its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and ease of staff adoption, supported by a review describing it as “very easy to navigate.” On the other hand, Easy Innkeeping scores 4.4/5, with positive feedback emphasizing its straightforward reservation and guest communication features.

Despite Cloudbeds’s slightly higher rating, both platforms are considered user-friendly. However, Cloudbeds’s extensive training resources and large support team contribute to a smoother onboarding experience for larger teams. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Features: Cloudbeds or Easy Innkeeping?

Cloudbeds boasts 49 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, multi-lingual support, and a sophisticated channel manager. It also offers advanced booking engine capabilities, automated reporting, and integrated payment processing, making it a versatile choice for diverse property types.

Easy Innkeeping offers only 7 features unique to its platform, mainly focused on reservations, guest CRM, and basic OTA connections. While sufficient for small properties, it lacks the breadth of automation and operational tools Cloudbeds provides.

Given the extensive feature set and recent industry awards, Cloudbeds has the edge for hotels seeking a comprehensive management system.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cloudbeds or Easy Innkeeping?

Cloudbeds supports its users with a 4.38/5 customer support rating, praised for quick responses and helpful service, with reviews mentioning “responsive and friendly” support staff. However, some users note occasional delays during peak times.

Easy Innkeeping scores a perfect 5/5, with reviewers highlighting “excellent support” and “generous, courteous staff” that promptly resolve issues. Yet, its small sample size of reviews and lack of recent feedback make it harder to gauge ongoing support quality.

Given Cloudbeds’s larger, more recent review base and consistent support ratings, it has the advantage. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cloudbeds or Easy Innkeeping?

Cloudbeds’s 4.62/5 rating is backed by over 1,200 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its ease of use, integration, and scalability. Properties across segments—particularly boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts—appreciate its reliability and growth features.

Easy Innkeeping’s 0/5 rating, based on only 5 reviews with no recent data, diminishes confidence in its current performance and support. Hoteliers seeking proven solutions with measurable satisfaction should favor Cloudbeds.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

How Much Do Cloudbeds and Easy Innkeeping Cost?

Cloudbeds’s pricing begins at $500/month, with no free tier or trial info available, reflecting its enterprise-grade capabilities. Its cost is justified by the extensive features, integrations, and support that come with the platform.

Easy Innkeeping’s base price is $300/month, with a 30-day trial, making it more accessible for smaller properties with limited budgets. However, the limited feature set might not justify the price for properties seeking growth or automation.

For most hotels aiming for scalability and comprehensive management, Cloudbeds’s investment offers more value.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

  • Hotels that want to automate operations across multiple departments.
  • Properties aiming to grow their distribution network internationally.
  • Hotels looking for advanced revenue management and analytics.
  • Teams prepared to invest in a scalable, future-proof system.
  • Not ideal if your property is a very small inn or vacation rental with minimal operational complexity.

Cloudbeds’s broad feature set and global support make it ideal for properties with ambitions to expand or optimize their existing operations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Easy Innkeeping?

  • Small hotels, inns, or vacation rentals seeking straightforward reservation management.
  • Properties with limited staff who want an easy-to-learn platform.
  • Hotels focusing mainly on online bookings and guest communication.
  • Teams that prioritize budget-friendly solutions with quick setup.
  • Not ideal if your property plans to scale significantly or needs advanced automation.

Easy Innkeeping is suitable for properties with basic operational needs and limited growth plans.

Cloudbeds vs Easy Innkeeping: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Cloudbeds is the more comprehensive, reliable choice for hoteliers seeking to streamline, automate, and scale their operations. Its extensive feature set, large review base, and recent positive feedback affirm its leadership in the market.

If your hotel prioritizes a robust, integrated system capable of supporting growth and complex operations, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. It provides advanced tools for revenue, distribution, and guest management—making it the smarter long-term investment.

Conversely, if your property is small, with simple reservation needs and a tight budget, Easy Innkeeping might suffice, though its limited recent feedback and feature set could pose challenges as your property expands.

Ultimately, for properties serious about growth, efficiency, and guest experience, Cloudbeds offers the deeper, more proven solution.

Cloudbeds HMS 和 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping 的价格是多少?

酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds GraceSoft GraceSoft
Starting Price From $500/mo From $300/mo

功能对比:Cloudbeds HMS 与 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds GraceSoft GraceSoft
会计与金融
86%
86%
多币种
礼品卡
直接计费
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
自动化夜间审计
付款请求
营销与电子商务
64%
100%
原生电子邮件营销
团体预订引擎
网站开发
预订引擎
频道管理员
礼品卡
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
宾客沟通(短信)
原生电子邮件营销
宾客资料
客户关系管理
管理和配置
100%
100%
多种语言
多币种
集中用户和角色管理
用户管理
67%
100%
原生电子邮件营销
客人反馈管理
礼品卡
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
宾客资料
集中消息传递
前台
86%
93%
客人反馈管理
家政
物业管理系统
自动化夜间审计
移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本)
移动应用程序
日历视图
任务管理
自动提醒
宾客资料
平板电脑/自助值机
付款请求
集中消息传递
自动空间优化
群组管理
100%
100%
组功能
自动空间优化
宾客体验
60%
70%
客人反馈管理
礼品卡
集成身份证和护照扫描仪
数字注册
访客应用程序
网上值机
网上结账
宾客留言
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
平板电脑/自助值机
家政
89%
89%
家政
自动空间优化
客房服务手机应用程序
实时状态更新
自动分配
实时报告
轮班规划
员工信息
网上结账
付款
84%
100%
多币种
礼品卡
付款请求
直接计费
自动提醒
集成支付终端和读卡器
预订管理
84%
75%
评分购物模块
物业管理系统
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
礼品卡
频道管理员
综合 CRS
拖放式磁带图
费率管理
自动空间优化
自动分配
基于规则的房间分配
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
收入管理
88%
63%
评分购物模块
收益管理模块
定价情报
频道管理员
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
自定义费率
辅助收入跟踪
基本定价
税务与合规
100%
50%
符合 PCI 标准
符合 GDPR 规定
SOC2投诉
税务配置
支持与培训
100%
100%
全天候在线支持
食品与饮料
0%
100%
销售点
Other
100%
0%
无限频道(无需额外费用)

实际成果:Cloudbeds 对比 GraceSoft(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas 中型
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
GraceSoft GraceSoft

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

提高运营效率
Cloudbeds Flor Parks 小型
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

V
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
GraceSoft GraceSoft

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne 小型
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations
GraceSoft GraceSoft

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds 对比 GraceSoft:总结

Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 来自 1,431 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Ease of use and staff adoption 91% 正面

A major theme is that Cloudbeds is intuitive, easy to learn, and simple for staff with limited PMS experience to adopt quickly. Reviewers consistently... A major theme is that Cloudbeds is intuitive, easy to learn, and simple for staff with limited PMS experience to adopt quickly. Reviewers consistently link this usability to faster onboarding, less training time, and smoother daily operations for front desk teams.

Reservations and booking flexibility 68% 正面

Reviewers often praise how quickly they can create, change, and manage reservations, including check-ins, cancellations, room moves, and room blocks.... Reviewers often praise how quickly they can create, change, and manage reservations, including check-ins, cancellations, room moves, and room blocks. However, several also want more flexible handling of split stays, non-consecutive dates, second guests, and safer drag-and-drop editing to avoid accidental changes.

客户支持和入职协助 64% 正面

用户经常会提及支持质量,如果用户能快速联系到知识渊博的客服人员或在注册过程中获得帮助,通常会获得好评。负面评价则集中在响应速度慢、工单处理延迟以及用户... 用户经常会提及支持质量,如果用户能快速联系到知识渊博的客服人员或在注册过程中获得帮助,通常会获得好评。负面评价则集中在响应速度慢、工单处理延迟以及用户无法联系到在线客服或无法及时获得明确解决方案时的沮丧情绪上。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告和分析 43% 负面

报表功能是核心价值驱动因素,用户表示需要快速访问入住率、收入、客房服务、财务和管理报表,以支持决策。同时,许多用户希望获得更可定制、更细致、更准确的报... 报表功能是核心价值驱动因素,用户表示需要快速访问入住率、收入、客房服务、财务和管理报表,以支持决策。同时,许多用户希望获得更可定制、更细致、更准确的报表,尤其是在会计、税务、追加销售和多物业分析方面。

性能、稳定性和漏洞 69% 负面

评论者多次提到 Cloudbeds 总体上稳定可靠,但仍有一些用户遇到加载缓慢、偶尔崩溃、故障或可能中断工作的行为等问题。最常见的问题包括页面加载缓慢、重复创建... 评论者多次提到 Cloudbeds 总体上稳定可靠,但仍有一些用户遇到加载缓慢、偶尔崩溃、故障或可能中断工作的行为等问题。最常见的问题包括页面加载缓慢、重复创建个人资料、移动端功能卡顿以及界面操作导致的意外更改。

排名更高的方面

中型(25-74 间客房) #1 vs #31
小型(10-24 间客房) #2 vs #36
住宿加早餐与客栈 #3 vs #36
精品酒店 #1 vs #35

独特功能

PMS 连接性 分析仪表板 库存管理 2路实时集成 集中的用户和角色管理
4.6/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 193 个集成
访问官网
GraceSoft
GraceSoft
4.3/5 来自 8 条评价

独特功能

礼品卡 轮班规划 原生电子邮件营销 原生电子邮件营销 客户关系管理
4.6/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 GraceSoft 5.0 vs 4.4 (+0.6)
入职培训 GraceSoft 4.8 vs 4.4 (+0.4)

关于 Cloudbeds HMS 与 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping 的常见问题

Cloudbeds HMS 能否替代 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping?

这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 193 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Cloudbeds HMS 或 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping 是否提供免费方案?

Cloudbeds HMS:否。GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Cloudbeds HMS 和 GraceSoft Easy Innkeeping?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,GraceSoft 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案

Ghostel icon
值得信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息