The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,566 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 intuitiveness and ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
roommaster 表现出色 在 技术支援 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 1,566 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,414 | 152 |
在分析了 1,566 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 roommaster 用户则强调 技术支援, 预订管理, 用户友好界面。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
−
系统稳定性
▾
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
−
可自定义报告
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #14 47 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #7 66 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | #6 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #14 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #11 46 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #17 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | #12 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | #11 14 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | #8 102 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #18 7 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and roommaster HMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational maturity. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Cloudbeds offers a broader, more integrated approach, while roommaster emphasizes detailed reservation control and financial visibility. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize ease of use and scalability or deep customization and reporting.
Given the recent review data, Cloudbeds’ higher ratings and more recent feedback give it the edge. Are you ready to dive into the details?
Both Cloudbeds and roommaster serve the core purpose of hotel management—centralizing reservations, front desk activities, and guest communications. Cloudbeds, with its 1,219 reviews and an overall rating of 4.62/5, is the more popular choice, especially with recent feedback in the last 6 months. Conversely, roommaster, with only 129 reviews and a 4.32/5 score, has a smaller, more specialized user base.
Cloudbeds is praised for its ease of use, automation, and broad feature set, making it suitable for properties seeking a scalable, all-in-one platform. roommaster, however, excels in detailed reservation workflows and robust reporting, appealing to hotels with complex operational needs. Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s growth stage?
If your hotel needs an intuitive, scalable platform that combines booking, channel management, and guest experience tools, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its extensive integration capabilities and user-friendly design make it ideal for small to mid-sized hotels aiming to streamline operations without a steep learning curve.
If your hotel requires detailed reservation control, advanced reporting, and deeper financial insights, roommaster's over 270 built-in reports and custom workflows will serve you better. It’s best for properties that prioritize operational granularity and are prepared for a longer onboarding process.
In summary, choose Cloudbeds for ease and growth, and roommaster for control and detailed analytics.
Cloudbeds boasts a user satisfaction rating of 4.58/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and fast onboarding. Many users mention that even staff with limited technical skills find Cloudbeds easy to navigate, thanks to its mobile-optimized design.
roommaster scores slightly lower at 4.41/5, with reviews highlighting its straightforward reservation management but noting that initial setup and customization could be improved. Some users mention that system stability issues occasionally hinder ease of use.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 36 features unique to its platform, including multi-channel distribution, automated night audits, integrated CRS, and online checkout—features that significantly expand its hotel management capabilities. Its broader feature set caters to automation, guest engagement, and revenue optimization.
roommaster, with only 15 features exclusive to its platform, focuses on detailed reservation workflows, POS integration, guest CRM, and ancillary revenue tracking. Its features are tailored for hotels seeking granular control over operations and detailed reporting.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s customer support scores at 4.38/5, with recent reviews praising quick, friendly responses and proactive onboarding. Hoteliers report that support staff are responsive and helpful, which is crucial during technology transitions.
roommaster’s support, rated at 4.34/5, is described as responsive but sometimes hampered by system stability issues post-updates. Users appreciate their technical support but note room for improvement during system outages.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs and revenue management systems, with 33 integrations shared with roommaster. Its extensive partner network simplifies multi-channel distribution and operational connectivity.
roommaster has 56 verified partners, with notable integrations in POS and guest communication systems, but fewer overall compared to Cloudbeds. Some users wish for broader third-party compatibility and more OTA connections.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating of 4.62/5 and recent review counts indicate a higher level of satisfaction across various hotel segments. Its user feedback emphasizes ease, automation, and support, especially from boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains.
roommaster’s rating of 4.32/5 reflects satisfaction among larger, multi-property hotels and resorts. However, with fewer recent reviews, its ratings are less current and less comprehensive.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Both products are priced at a base $500 setup fee, with no mention of additional monthly charges or tiers. Pricing appears straightforward, but detailed subscription costs are not specified, possibly varying based on property size and features.
Not ideal if your hotel needs highly customized workflows or complex revenue management.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, highly intuitive interface or quick setup.
Cloudbeds provides a broad, intuitive, and highly integrated platform that suits hotels of all sizes aiming for growth and efficiency. Its recent review data shows higher satisfaction, especially in ease of use, support, and feature diversity.
roommaster offers exceptional reservation control and detailed reporting, making it ideal for larger properties or those with complex operations. However, its slower updates and lower recent review count make it less appealing for hotels prioritizing agility and modern user experience.
In conclusion, if you want a scalable, all-in-one system that adapts to your hotel’s growth, Cloudbeds is the stronger choice. For highly detailed control and reporting, especially in established operations, roommaster remains a solid option—but be prepared for a longer onboarding process.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds HMS 和 roommaster HMS 共享 54 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 销售点 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 39 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
技术支持团队的响应速度和专业水平一直备受赞誉,许多用户对问题的快速解决表示满意。然而,一些用户建议在更新前进行更充分的测试,以减少发布后出现的问题。
用户称赞 ROOMMASTER 的预订管理便捷,有助于实现流畅的预订流程和直接预订。然而,部分用户反映 OTA 集成存在问题,导致超额预订。增强自动化功能和实现无缝的... 用户称赞 ROOMMASTER 的预订管理便捷,有助于实现流畅的预订流程和直接预订。然而,部分用户反映 OTA 集成存在问题,导致超额预订。增强自动化功能和实现无缝的渠道管理将有助于提升整体效率。
用户称赞该软件的用户界面友好,操作便捷,尤其是在处理预订和交易方面。然而,一些反馈意见建议对某些功能进行改进,例如搜索菜单和运行时变量。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多条评论都提到了系统宕机和偶尔出现的不稳定问题。用户建议改进云稳定性,以确保运行稳定,尤其是在预订或更新期间。
虽然 ROOMMASTER 提供报表功能,但用户通常觉得报表自定义选项有限,并且希望获得更灵活的筛选功能以及与其他系统的集成。改进的定制报表选项可以提升战略规划中... 虽然 ROOMMASTER 提供报表功能,但用户通常觉得报表自定义选项有限,并且希望获得更灵活的筛选功能以及与其他系统的集成。改进的定制报表选项可以提升战略规划中数据的整体利用率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 roommaster HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster HMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。roommaster HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,roommaster 的为 84。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问