项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,649 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 易于使用,快速上手 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
Visual Matrix PMS 表现出色 在 technical support challenges 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
基于 HTR 上 1,649 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $500/月 | 起价 $500/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,490 | 159 |
在分析了 1,649 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 易于使用,快速上手, 客户支持和培训, integrated all-in-one operations,而 Visual Matrix PMS 用户则强调 technical support challenges, 用户友好的界面, comprehensive reporting tools。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用,快速上手
▾
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
+
客户支持和培训
▾
|
+
用户友好的界面
▾
|
|
+
Integrated all-in-one operations
▾
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
+
频道管理器和OTA同步
▾
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析深度
▾
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
−
预订编辑和工作流程灵活性
▾
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
−
移动应用和通知
▾
|
−
系统速度和功能可用性
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #18 23 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #2 117 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #12 38 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | #1 124 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | #4 44 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | #7 141 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Visual Matrix PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but their core strengths and user experiences differ significantly. Cloudbeds offers a more extensive, integrated platform favored by a broad range of hotel segments, while Visual Matrix excels in automation tools for understaffed properties seeking efficiency. Which system will best serve your property’s growth and daily operations?
Both platforms aim to optimize operations, reduce manual work, and improve guest experiences. Cloudbeds’ comprehensive features and larger user base give it an edge in scalability and support, but Visual Matrix’s automation and staff management tools cater well to smaller, lean teams. Are you ready to see which aligns more with your hotel’s goals?
Cloudbeds and Visual Matrix address similar operational challenges but approach them differently. Cloudbeds specializes in a unified ecosystem that connects reservations, revenue management, and guest communication, making it ideal for hotels seeking a one-stop solution. Visual Matrix focuses heavily on automation, staff connectivity, and operational efficiency, especially for properties with limited staffing. Which set of features better matches your hotel’s operational model?
Cloudbeds is designed to serve properties of all sizes, from boutique to large resorts, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use and rich integration options. Visual Matrix, with a smaller but dedicated user base, appeals to understaffed hotels that need automation and real-time staff coordination. Do you prioritize a broad, scalable platform or targeted automation tools?
If your hotel needs a scalable, all-in-one management platform that handles reservations, channel distribution, and guest experience in one place, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its more recent, higher review count (1,219 reviews in the last six months) and superior ratings (4.62/5 overall) indicate stronger user satisfaction across segments.
If your hotel is small or understaffed, and your priority is automating daily tasks and improving staff communication, Visual Matrix may suit you better. However, given Cloudbeds’ more recent reviews and higher overall ratings, it’s the safer, more proven option for growth-focused properties. Which priorities matter most: scalability or automation?
Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.58/5 for ease of use, with many users commenting on its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Reviewers frequently highlight its modern design and straightforward navigation, helping staff adapt rapidly.
Visual Matrix, rated 4.43/5, also receives praise for its user-friendly interface and mobile app, which simplifies daily management. However, some users note that system speed can hinder ease of use during busy periods.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 47 features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, online check-in, group functionality, and multi-lingual support, in addition to 43 shared features. These capabilities enable comprehensive management from bookings to guest engagement.
Visual Matrix provides 12 unique features, such as housekeeping and maintenance automation, guest CRM, and guest app functionality. While powerful for operational automation, it lacks some advanced revenue and distribution tools found in Cloudbeds.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support ratings are slightly higher at 4.38/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its quick and helpful responses, especially during onboarding. Users describe support as attentive and responsive, essential during critical issues.
Visual Matrix’s customer support scores 4.34/5, with reviewers appreciating their knowledgeable staff and helpful weekly tips. However, some users note occasional difficulties reaching support during high-demand periods.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds connects with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and revenue tools like SiteMinder and Duetto, providing extensive connectivity. Its integrations facilitate seamless operations and reduce manual updates.
Visual Matrix supports 23 verified partners, including key systems like Otelier and SkyTouch, but it has a narrower integration ecosystem. Its open API and automation tools are robust but less extensive than Cloudbeds.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds receives a higher overall rating (4.62/5) from a broad user base, including boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts, with recent reviews showing continued satisfaction. Hoteliers appreciate its ease of use, feature richness, and support responsiveness.
Visual Matrix’s ratings (3.75/5) are based on fewer reviews, mostly from small properties and hostels. While users praise its automation, some comment on system slowness and limited features, impacting overall satisfaction.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Both platforms are priced at a base rate of $500 monthly, with no freemium or trial options available. Additional costs may arise from integrations or add-on features, but the core pricing remains comparable.
Since detailed pricing beyond the base fee isn't provided, your decision should focus on feature needs and support quality rather than cost differences.
Cloudbeds is the more comprehensive, scalable management platform, backed by a larger user base and more recent, positive reviews. Its extensive integrations, broad feature set, and consistent support make it ideal for hotels aiming to grow and operate efficiently.
Visual Matrix excels in automating operational tasks for understaffed properties, particularly in housekeeping and maintenance. Its automation tools and user-friendly mobile app suit smaller hotels or hostels that want to optimize staff workflow and reduce manual effort.
If your hotel needs a flexible, all-in-one system with proven support and scalability, Cloudbeds is your best choice. Conversely, if automation and staff connectivity are your top priorities, especially for smaller or budget properties, Visual Matrix may serve you better.
In summary: For most hotels, especially those looking to expand and improve guest experience through integrated systems and reliable support, Cloudbeds offers a more robust solution. But if operational automation is your main goal and your team is lean, Visual Matrix can deliver targeted efficiencies.
Note: This comparison is based on recent reviews and available feature data. Consider your property size, growth plans, and operational needs when making your decision.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $500/月 | 起价 $500/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 系统因其直观易用、界面简洁、便于员工快速上手而广受好评,这不仅缩短了培训时间,也帮助酒店轻松上手。评论者普遍认为,这种简洁性有助于提高运营的... Cloudbeds 系统因其直观易用、界面简洁、便于员工快速上手而广受好评,这不仅缩短了培训时间,也帮助酒店轻松上手。评论者普遍认为,这种简洁性有助于提高运营的一致性,尤其对于规模较小的团队和多地点运营商而言更是如此。
用户普遍认为客服响应迅速、知识渊博且乐于助人,其中在线聊天和新手引导服务尤为突出。与此同时,也有不少用户希望问题能够更快得到解决,获得更多人工服务,以... 用户普遍认为客服响应迅速、知识渊博且乐于助人,其中在线聊天和新手引导服务尤为突出。与此同时,也有不少用户希望问题能够更快得到解决,获得更多人工服务,以及更完善的产品内培训或针对新房源或复杂房源设置的专门指导。
A central theme is that Cloudbeds replaces multiple disconnected tools by combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, payments, guest data, and... A central theme is that Cloudbeds replaces multiple disconnected tools by combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, payments, guest data, and other workflows in one system. Buyers value this because it cuts manual work, improves coordination, and lets staff spend more time on guests instead of system juggling.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评论者赞赏 Cloudbeds 提供的全面运营和财务报告,这些报告能够支持管理决策、入住率跟踪和收入监管。然而,他们也经常要求提供更多定制化功能、更快的下载... 许多评论者赞赏 Cloudbeds 提供的全面运营和财务报告,这些报告能够支持管理决策、入住率跟踪和收入监管。然而,他们也经常要求提供更多定制化功能、更快的下载速度、更完善的仪表盘和更清晰的财务视图,尤其是在会计核算、多物业管理或多币种需求方面。
用户喜欢拆分预订、更改未来日期、更改房间以及集中式预订管理等功能,但他们也指出,当编辑操作变得复杂或需要点击次数过多时,会造成不便。许多评论都要求改进... 用户喜欢拆分预订、更改未来日期、更改房间以及集中式预订管理等功能,但他们也指出,当编辑操作变得复杂或需要点击次数过多时,会造成不便。许多评论都要求改进拖放操作的安全性、更灵活的拆分预订功能、更完善的账单管理以及更清晰的紧急操作变更控制。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
Visual Matrix 的直观设计降低了学习难度,方便新员工使用。然而,一些用户提到,从其他系统过渡到 Visual Matrix 初期会遇到一些困难。
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 199 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visual Matrix PMS 提供 25 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。Visual Matrix PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Visual Matrix PMS 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐