The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 368 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 customer service 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Requests and Online Check-in.
Visual Matrix PMS 表现出色 在 technical support challenges 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
基于 HTR 上 368 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 216 | 152 |
在分析了 368 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 customer service, user friendly interface and ease of use, 沟通与融合,而 Visual Matrix PMS 用户则强调 technical support challenges, 用户友好的界面, comprehensive reporting tools。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
+
User Friendly Interface and Ease of Use
▾
|
+
用户友好的界面
▾
|
|
+
沟通与融合
▾
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
聊天支持限制
▾
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
−
群组管理和自动化
▾
|
−
系统速度和功能可用性
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 54 条评价 | #18 23 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | #2 117 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #10 6 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #21 0 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 44 条评价 | #12 38 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 35 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 19 条评价 | #1 124 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 12 条评价 | #4 44 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #10 30 条评价 | #7 141 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 152 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #25 2 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | #21 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right hotel management software hinges on your hotel’s unique needs, operational scale, and growth plans. eviivo Suite™ HMS and Visual Matrix PMS both aim to simplify hotel operations, but they approach this goal differently. eviivo, with its higher review count and more recent feedback, currently holds an edge in trustworthiness and adaptability. Which platform will serve your hotel best—one built for independent accommodations or a more comprehensive, staff-centric system? Let’s explore.
Both eviivo and Visual Matrix are designed to streamline hotel management, yet their core strengths differ. eviivo shines with its focus on independent properties, offering features like website development and online check-in, making it ideal for small to mid-size independent hotels and vacation rentals. Visual Matrix, on the other hand, emphasizes staff efficiency with tools like housekeeping automation and dynamic pricing, suiting larger, under-resourced teams.
While eviivo boasts a higher overall rating (1/5 vs 3.75/5), it also has more reviews (191 vs 143) and more recent feedback, indicating stronger user confidence. Despite the lower overall rating, eviivo’s customer service ratings (4.57/5) are slightly better than Visual Matrix’s (4.34/5). Does this mean eviivo's proven track record outweighs Visual Matrix’s robust operational controls? The answer likely depends on your hotel’s operational complexity and guest engagement priorities.
If your hotel operates as an independent property, vacation rental, or boutique inn with a focus on online booking and direct marketing, eviivo is the logical pick. Its features like website creation, online check-in, and seamless OTA integrations support growth in direct bookings and ease daily operations. Conversely, if your team is understaffed and needs a system that automates housekeeping, guest messaging, and dynamic pricing, Visual Matrix offers these capabilities with a focus on operational efficiency.
In addition, eviivo’s lower entry price point ($700) and extensive partner network (32 verified integrations) make it attractive for small to medium properties. Visual Matrix, at $500, offers strong control over revenue management and staff task automation, which may appeal to larger hotels aiming to streamline operations without expanding headcount.
Ease of use is a key factor, especially with technology adoption across teams. eviivo ranks slightly higher in usability with a 4.48/5 rating, compared to Visual Matrix’s 4.43/5. Both platforms are praised for intuitive interfaces and straightforward onboarding. eviivo’s reviews emphasize its well-designed booking and reporting workflows, with users highlighting its simplicity for staff training.
However, some eviivo users mention that its interface design could improve further and highlight support challenges in chat. Visual Matrix’s interface is described as user-friendly and fast once mastered, with strong mobile capabilities—though some users find the system sluggish during peak times.
Edge: eviivo, given its slightly higher overall ease-of-use rating and recent positive user feedback.
eviivo’s standout features include website development, online check-in/out, and payment requests—tools that directly impact guest experience and operational flow. It offers 4 features not found in Visual Matrix, making it more versatile in managing online bookings and direct marketing. Visual Matrix excels with 5 unique features, including Point of Sale, GDPR compliance, and rules-based room assignments—vital for larger hotels or resorts with complex operations.
Both platforms share 50 core features, but eviivo’s additional online marketing and guest engagement tools give it a slight edge for properties prioritizing revenue growth. Visual Matrix’s automation, like MOP for housekeeping, offers a strong operational advantage, especially for teams managing high turnover or limited staff.
Edge: eviivo, owing to its broader online engagement suite and additional online booking features.
Support quality influences your team’s confidence in a PMS. eviivo’s reviews highlight exceptional customer service, rated at 4.57/5, with users praising its professionalism and quick issue resolution. Some reviews mention support responsiveness as a key strength, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Visual Matrix also scores well, at 4.34/5, with users appreciating their knowledgeable support team. However, some users report difficulty reaching tech support during critical issues, which can slow down operations.
Edge: eviivo, based on higher support ratings and more recent positive feedback.
Integration breadth impacts how well your PMS connects with other systems. eviivo boasts 32 verified partners, including popular OTAs and revenue tools like TripAdvisor, PriceLabs, and Duve. It also offers more unique integrations, facilitating broader distribution and automation.
Visual Matrix has 23 verified partners, with notable integrations like SkyTouch, SiteMinder, and Otelier. While fewer in number, its integrations focus on operational tools such as housekeeping and maintenance apps, appealing to hotels seeking efficiency.
Edge: eviivo, due to its larger partner network and diverse integration options.
Recent reviews reveal eviivo’s stronger standing, especially among independent and small hotel properties. Its overall rating of 1/5 may seem low but is skewed by a few very negative reviews, whereas the most recent reviews—22 in the last 6 months—are overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing ease of use and customer service.
Visual Matrix scores 3.75/5 from 143 reviews, with many users appreciating its simple interface and automation tools. However, some property types, like branded hotels, have rated it lower (0/5 in some cases), indicating inconsistent satisfaction across segments.
Given the volume and recency of eviivo’s reviews, it currently holds the stronger reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: eviivo, with its more recent, favorable feedback and higher overall ratings.
Pricing details are straightforward. eviivo charges a fixed $700 base fee, with no mention of additional implementation or monthly fees, making its costs predictable. Visual Matrix’s price is $500, also without additional charges, but no further pricing details are provided.
While both offer transparent pricing, eviivo’s slightly higher cost might reflect its broader feature set and global support, making it more suitable for properties aiming for growth. Visual Matrix’s lower price could be attractive for smaller hotels with a tight budget but might limit some advanced features.
Hotels that thrive with eviivo:
Not ideal if:
Visual Matrix suits:
Not ideal if:
eviivo excels at supporting independent and small properties with a focus on online growth, guest engagement, and ease of use. Its recent reviews and higher overall ratings suggest it’s the more trusted choice for these segments, especially given its extensive integrations and customer support.
Visual Matrix offers a robust back-end management solution tailored for larger or understaffed hotels that need automation and operational control. Its feature set emphasizes efficiency, with tools like housekeeping automation and dynamic pricing, making it ideal for properties with complex operational needs.
If your hotel prioritizes online marketing, guest engagement, and rapid growth, choose eviivo. If operational automation and staff efficiency are your primary goals, Visual Matrix provides a compelling alternative.
In summary, eviivo’s higher recent review count and overall rating give it a clear advantage for most independent hoteliers. It is the better choice if your focus is on online presence, revenue growth, and customer service. Visual Matrix remains an excellent option for larger hotels or properties needing comprehensive operational automation, especially when under-resourced.
Ultimately, your decision should align with your property’s scale, growth ambitions, and operational complexity. Both platforms are capable, but eviivo’s recent feedback suggests it currently has the edge for hoteliers seeking reliability and growth.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,eviivo Suite™ HMS 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享 50 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款请求 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Managing The Historic Berkeley Place is a unique challenge given its historic significance and diverse suite offerings. With eviivo, every aspect, from booking to guest communicati..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users frequently commend Eviivo for its exceptional customer service, with advisors like Jilani, Gu7etif, and Sam noted for their professionalism and... Users frequently commend Eviivo for its exceptional customer service, with advisors like Jilani, Gu7etif, and Sam noted for their professionalism and responsiveness during support interactions. The support team's availability significantly aids users in troubleshooting and optimizing system use.
Eviivo's interface is consistently hailed as simple and intuitive, making it easy for newcomers to manage bookings, calendars, and hotel operations ef... Eviivo's interface is consistently hailed as simple and intuitive, making it easy for newcomers to manage bookings, calendars, and hotel operations effortlessly. This contributes to enhanced productivity by reducing the learning curve for users.
与短信和WhatsApp等通讯工具的集成是一项显著功能,许多用户都赞赏其简化客户互动的方式。这有助于提升客户体验的定制化和个性化程度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管Eviivo的在线聊天支持服务总体上广受好评,但一些用户反映其存在一些不足,例如客服人员在线时间有限、服务质量参差不齐等。改进这些方面有助于提升整体客户... 尽管Eviivo的在线聊天支持服务总体上广受好评,但一些用户反映其存在一些不足,例如客服人员在线时间有限、服务质量参差不齐等。改进这些方面有助于提升整体客户服务体验。
Eviivo高效的预订管理功能备受赞誉,可帮助酒店跨渠道无缝管理客房供应和预订情况。这通过确保有效的入住率管理,提升了收益优化。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
Visual Matrix 的直观设计降低了学习难度,方便新员工使用。然而,一些用户提到,从其他系统过渡到 Visual Matrix 初期会遇到一些困难。
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ HMS 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ HMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visual Matrix PMS 提供 23 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ HMS:否。Visual Matrix PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 88,Visual Matrix PMS 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问