The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 402 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
MISTER BOOKING 表现出色 在 支持质量 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Employee Messaging.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 402 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 372 |
在分析了 402 条经验证的评价后,MISTER BOOKING 用户最看重其 支持质量, 可定制的功能, 人体工程学和设计,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
+
人体工程学和设计
▾
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #33 14 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #45 4 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #40 10 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #35 7 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #46 3 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 25 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #36 1 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing between Misterbooking by MISTER BOOKING and Stayntouch hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and technological preferences. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their strengths diverge significantly. Misterbooking is a European-made PMS with a focus on independent hotels and small to mid-sized properties, while Stayntouch offers a cloud-native platform with expansive multi-property and third-party integrations, making it more suited for larger or growing hotel groups.
Both products address reservation management, front desk operations, and guest satisfaction, yet they differ in scope, feature depth, and regional presence. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize a more customizable, locally-focused PMS or a cloud-based, integrative solution with extensive third-party support.
Misterbooking provides a highly rated PMS experience with a 4.78/5 overall rating from 29 reviews, and the majority of recent reviews remain positive despite limited volume. Its strengths lie in connectivity, pricing customization, and support, but users note room for ergonomic improvement and reporting enhancements. Conversely, Stayntouch boasts a broader global footprint, over 317 reviews, and a higher recent review count—26 in the last six months—reflecting stronger recent customer feedback.
While Misterbooking excels in European, independent hotel markets with a focus on affordability and customization, Stayntouch commands a more extensive international presence, especially in North America and Asia Pacific, with a reputation for scalability and mobile-first operation. How much do your operational scale and regional presence influence your choice?
If your hotel needs a cost-effective, flexible PMS that integrates well with third-party booking channels and is highly customizable, Misterbooking is the better choice. Its features suit independent hotels, inns, and boutique properties that value connectivity and support, especially if your team appreciates a system with native email marketing, automated reminders, and employee messaging.
On the other hand, if your hotel is part of a larger chain, requires robust multi-property management, or values extensive integrations, Stayntouch is the clear winner. Its advanced features like mobile check-in, digital registration, and integrated payment terminals cater well to modern, fast-paced operations seeking scalability and guest-centric digital solutions.
Misterbooking’s UI scores a 4.71/5, and reviews praise its straightforwardness, especially for operators familiar with traditional PMSs. Its onboarding process receives a 4.67/5, and users emphasize the support team's responsiveness. However, some note that certain functions, like popup translations and report customization, could be improved for ease.
Stayntouch’s interface is similarly highly rated at 4.7/5, with users highlighting its intuitive design and mobile capabilities. Many reviewers mention how quickly staff adapt to the system, and the platform’s cloud-based operation simplifies remote access. Overall, both platforms are user-friendly, but Stayntouch’s modern, mobile-first approach slightly edges out Misterbooking.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Misterbooking offers 3 exclusive features: native email marketing, automated reminders, and employee messaging—valuable for targeted communication and operational alerts. Stayntouch boasts 19 unique features, including automated night audits, mobile guest apps, integrated ID scanners, task management, and online checkout, providing a broader suite of operational tools.
While Misterbooking’s features focus on communication and automation, Stayntouch’s extensive feature set is tailored for comprehensive hotel management, especially in contactless check-in and multi-property oversight. The sheer number of unique features in Stayntouch makes it the more feature-rich choice.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Misterbooking’s customer support has a 4.79/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and ongoing support. Users appreciate their support team’s availability, though some mention the need for faster responses during weekend hours.
Stayntouch scores 4.68/5, with reviewers praising the onboarding, training, and overall support experience. Many mention that their staff found the support team friendly, knowledgeable, and proactive during implementation. Given the higher review count and recent positive feedback, Misterbooking’s support is marginally more praised.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Stayntouch offers 188 verified integrations, nearly seven times more than Misterbooking’s 26. Shared partners include key players like SiteMinder, Lightspeed, and Onity. Stayntouch’s extensive third-party connections, from revenue management to contactless check-in, cater to large, complex hotel operations.
Misterbooking’s integrations are more limited but focus on essential booking channels and connectivity with booking engines and GDS. If your hotel relies on a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, Stayntouch’s higher integration count is advantageous.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Misterbooking’s reviews, primarily from independent hotels and inns, yield a 4.78/5 rating, with recent reviews confirming ongoing satisfaction. Its niche appeal is reflected in high scores for connectivity and support, although ergonomic issues are noted.
Stayntouch’s 4.56/5 rating from over 317 reviews shows a slightly broader acceptance, with many praising its ease of use, mobile access, and multi-property features. Recent reviews are more positive, indicating that Stayntouch’s newer updates and broader adoption are resonating well with users.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking does not publicly disclose pricing—likely due to its customizable, regional, and client-specific approach—making direct comparisons challenging. Stayntouch charges $800 per month, with no additional implementation or setup fees, positioning it as a premium SaaS product.
Given the difference, your budget and the scale of your operation will heavily influence your choice. Misterbooking’s pricing might be more accessible for small independent hotels, while Stayntouch’s cost aligns with larger, multi-property management needs.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive mobile apps, contactless check-in, or multi-property management at scale.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small, regional property with limited budget or prefers a more traditional, on-premise PMS.
Misterbooking and Stayntouch are both capable property management systems, but their core strengths differ. Misterbooking shines in connectivity, support, and affordability for small to mid-sized independent properties, particularly in Europe.
Stayntouch excels in scalability, integrations, and mobile functionality, making it more suitable for larger hotel groups or properties looking for a future-proof, cloud-native solution. For hotels with broader operational needs and a focus on multi-property management, Stayntouch is the clearer choice.
Choose Misterbooking if your hotel values a highly customizable, regional-oriented PMS with strong support. Opt for Stayntouch if your priority is extensive integrations, mobile guest engagement, and scalable cloud management.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Misterbooking (PMS) 和 Stayntouch 共享 30 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 10 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应能力和效率一再被强调。无论是通过电话还是其他方式,他们的可用性和快速解决问题的能力对用户来说都是一大优势。
用户看重的是能够根据特定需求定制自己的账户。这种灵活性使 Misterbooking 能够很好地适应各种酒店运营,并提高了用户满意度。
虽然该软件功能强大、效率高,但用户指出其设计和人体工程学方面还有待改进。建议包括让布局更加人性化,以及更新一些过时的页面。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
提到需要更高效、更详细的统计工具或报告。用户认为改进这些功能可以带来更好的运营洞察力和决策能力。
预订引擎存在一些批评,例如照片上传选项不足和限制管理。用户建议在这些方面进行改进,以进一步完善系统。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Misterbooking (PMS) 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Misterbooking (PMS) 提供 26 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 188 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Misterbooking (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Misterbooking (PMS):否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MISTER BOOKING 的 HT Score 为 14,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问