项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 448 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
MISTER BOOKING 在支持质量方面表现出色,尤其适合民宿住宿设施(4.9/5),并拥有原生电子邮件营销以及员工信息等独家功能。
Stayntouch 在实施、培训和过渡支持方面表现出色,尤其适合青年旅舍住宿设施(4.8/5),并拥有移动应用以及平板电脑/自助服务终端值机等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 448 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $800/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 418 |
在分析了 448 条经验证的评价后,MISTER BOOKING 用户最看重其 支持质量, 可定制的功能, 人体工程学和设计,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 实施、培训和过渡支持, 易用性和快速的员工培训, 前台操作与预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
实施、培训和过渡支持
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
易用性和快速的员工培训
▾
|
|
+
人体工程学和设计
▾
|
+
前台操作与预订管理
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
−
报告与分析
▾
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
−
定制和工作流程的灵活性
▾
|
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
−
账单、账页和支付流程
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #33 14 条评价 | #19 58 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #47 4 条评价 | #5 223 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 49 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 59 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #41 11 条评价 | #6 247 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #34 8 条评价 | #6 195 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #46 3 条评价 | #3 159 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 298 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 25 条评价 | #13 65 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | #23 3 条评价 |
Choosing between Misterbooking by MISTER BOOKING and Stayntouch hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and technological preferences. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their strengths diverge significantly. Misterbooking is a European-made PMS with a focus on independent hotels and small to mid-sized properties, while Stayntouch offers a cloud-native platform with expansive multi-property and third-party integrations, making it more suited for larger or growing hotel groups.
Both products address reservation management, front desk operations, and guest satisfaction, yet they differ in scope, feature depth, and regional presence. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize a more customizable, locally-focused PMS or a cloud-based, integrative solution with extensive third-party support.
Misterbooking provides a highly rated PMS experience with a 4.78/5 overall rating from 29 reviews, and the majority of recent reviews remain positive despite limited volume. Its strengths lie in connectivity, pricing customization, and support, but users note room for ergonomic improvement and reporting enhancements. Conversely, Stayntouch boasts a broader global footprint, over 317 reviews, and a higher recent review count—26 in the last six months—reflecting stronger recent customer feedback.
While Misterbooking excels in European, independent hotel markets with a focus on affordability and customization, Stayntouch commands a more extensive international presence, especially in North America and Asia Pacific, with a reputation for scalability and mobile-first operation. How much do your operational scale and regional presence influence your choice?
If your hotel needs a cost-effective, flexible PMS that integrates well with third-party booking channels and is highly customizable, Misterbooking is the better choice. Its features suit independent hotels, inns, and boutique properties that value connectivity and support, especially if your team appreciates a system with native email marketing, automated reminders, and employee messaging.
On the other hand, if your hotel is part of a larger chain, requires robust multi-property management, or values extensive integrations, Stayntouch is the clear winner. Its advanced features like mobile check-in, digital registration, and integrated payment terminals cater well to modern, fast-paced operations seeking scalability and guest-centric digital solutions.
Misterbooking’s UI scores a 4.71/5, and reviews praise its straightforwardness, especially for operators familiar with traditional PMSs. Its onboarding process receives a 4.67/5, and users emphasize the support team's responsiveness. However, some note that certain functions, like popup translations and report customization, could be improved for ease.
Stayntouch’s interface is similarly highly rated at 4.7/5, with users highlighting its intuitive design and mobile capabilities. Many reviewers mention how quickly staff adapt to the system, and the platform’s cloud-based operation simplifies remote access. Overall, both platforms are user-friendly, but Stayntouch’s modern, mobile-first approach slightly edges out Misterbooking.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Misterbooking offers 3 exclusive features: native email marketing, automated reminders, and employee messaging—valuable for targeted communication and operational alerts. Stayntouch boasts 19 unique features, including automated night audits, mobile guest apps, integrated ID scanners, task management, and online checkout, providing a broader suite of operational tools.
While Misterbooking’s features focus on communication and automation, Stayntouch’s extensive feature set is tailored for comprehensive hotel management, especially in contactless check-in and multi-property oversight. The sheer number of unique features in Stayntouch makes it the more feature-rich choice.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Misterbooking’s customer support has a 4.79/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and ongoing support. Users appreciate their support team’s availability, though some mention the need for faster responses during weekend hours.
Stayntouch scores 4.68/5, with reviewers praising the onboarding, training, and overall support experience. Many mention that their staff found the support team friendly, knowledgeable, and proactive during implementation. Given the higher review count and recent positive feedback, Misterbooking’s support is marginally more praised.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Stayntouch offers 188 verified integrations, nearly seven times more than Misterbooking’s 26. Shared partners include key players like SiteMinder, Lightspeed, and Onity. Stayntouch’s extensive third-party connections, from revenue management to contactless check-in, cater to large, complex hotel operations.
Misterbooking’s integrations are more limited but focus on essential booking channels and connectivity with booking engines and GDS. If your hotel relies on a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, Stayntouch’s higher integration count is advantageous.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Misterbooking’s reviews, primarily from independent hotels and inns, yield a 4.78/5 rating, with recent reviews confirming ongoing satisfaction. Its niche appeal is reflected in high scores for connectivity and support, although ergonomic issues are noted.
Stayntouch’s 4.56/5 rating from over 317 reviews shows a slightly broader acceptance, with many praising its ease of use, mobile access, and multi-property features. Recent reviews are more positive, indicating that Stayntouch’s newer updates and broader adoption are resonating well with users.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking does not publicly disclose pricing—likely due to its customizable, regional, and client-specific approach—making direct comparisons challenging. Stayntouch charges $800 per month, with no additional implementation or setup fees, positioning it as a premium SaaS product.
Given the difference, your budget and the scale of your operation will heavily influence your choice. Misterbooking’s pricing might be more accessible for small independent hotels, while Stayntouch’s cost aligns with larger, multi-property management needs.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive mobile apps, contactless check-in, or multi-property management at scale.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small, regional property with limited budget or prefers a more traditional, on-premise PMS.
Misterbooking and Stayntouch are both capable property management systems, but their core strengths differ. Misterbooking shines in connectivity, support, and affordability for small to mid-sized independent properties, particularly in Europe.
Stayntouch excels in scalability, integrations, and mobile functionality, making it more suitable for larger hotel groups or properties looking for a future-proof, cloud-native solution. For hotels with broader operational needs and a focus on multi-property management, Stayntouch is the clearer choice.
Choose Misterbooking if your hotel values a highly customizable, regional-oriented PMS with strong support. Opt for Stayntouch if your priority is extensive integrations, mobile guest engagement, and scalable cloud management.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $800/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We really like the ability to customize our setups as much as possible, and that was pretty important to us. Being able to have a lot of those main features already at our fingerti..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应能力和效率一再被强调。无论是通过电话还是其他方式,他们的可用性和快速解决问题的能力对用户来说都是一大优势。
用户看重的是能够根据特定需求定制自己的账户。这种灵活性使 Misterbooking 能够很好地适应各种酒店运营,并提高了用户满意度。
虽然该软件功能强大、效率高,但用户指出其设计和人体工程学方面还有待改进。建议包括让布局更加人性化,以及更新一些过时的页面。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
提到需要更高效、更详细的统计工具或报告。用户认为改进这些功能可以带来更好的运营洞察力和决策能力。
预订引擎存在一些批评,例如照片上传选项不足和限制管理。用户建议在这些方面进行改进,以进一步完善系统。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一个主要的主题是Stayntouch在切换和培训方面的表现,许多评论者提到顺畅的过渡和现场指导的有效性。产品的上线体验似乎是一个关键的采购标准,因为用户反复称赞... 一个主要的主题是Stayntouch在切换和培训方面的表现,许多评论者提到顺畅的过渡和现场指导的有效性。产品的上线体验似乎是一个关键的采购标准,因为用户反复称赞培训师和实施专家帮助减轻压力、加快上线成功。
用户普遍反映Stayntouch界面直观,易于学习,即使是新员工或技术水平较低的员工也能快速掌握。这缩短了培训时间,帮助酒店更快让团队投入工作,减少错误。
评测者经常强调更快的入住办理、更便捷的预订查询、快速修改入住日期和房型,以及更顺畅的日常前台工作流程。这些功能帮助酒店加快宾客办理入住速度,确保在繁忙... 评测者经常强调更快的入住办理、更便捷的预订查询、快速修改入住日期和房型,以及更顺畅的日常前台工作流程。这些功能帮助酒店加快宾客办理入住速度,确保在繁忙时段运营井然有序。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价提到入住率、收入、税费、服务费和运营报告的价值,尤其是在日常管理决策中。然而,用户也希望拥有更灵活的筛选、更好的深入分析、更清晰的布局,以及更... 许多评价提到入住率、收入、税费、服务费和运营报告的价值,尤其是在日常管理决策中。然而,用户也希望拥有更灵活的筛选、更好的深入分析、更清晰的布局,以及更便捷地获取所需的具体报告。
许多用户重视根据运营需求定制设置、字段、价格逻辑、仪表盘和酒店工作流程的能力。但他们也希望在报告、界面布局和流程步骤上有更多的定制,显示出灵活性是一个... 许多用户重视根据运营需求定制设置、字段、价格逻辑、仪表盘和酒店工作流程的能力。但他们也希望在报告、界面布局和流程步骤上有更多的定制,显示出灵活性是一个差异化因素,但尚未完全实现。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Misterbooking (PMS) 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Misterbooking (PMS) 提供 26 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 200 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Misterbooking (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Misterbooking (PMS):否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。MISTER BOOKING 的 HT Score 为 13,Stayntouch 的为 95。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐