The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,267 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 Noovy 用户则强调 易于使用, 客户服务, 自动付款处理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
自动付款处理
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
直接 OTA 集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
设计
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
报告工具
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
翻译问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #39 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #38 12 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #38 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #54 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #52 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #22 23 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #16 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Noovy PMS comes down to your hotel’s unique needs, scale, and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds offers a broad, highly integrated platform that covers extensive operational and revenue management features, while Noovy provides a straightforward, cost-effective solution tailored for independent hotels seeking simplicity. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but their depth and scope differ significantly. Which aligns better with your current priorities?
Cloudbeds excels in comprehensive integrations and features, making it ideal for hotels with complex operations or ambitions to scale. Conversely, Noovy's simplicity and affordability appeal to boutique and independent hotels that want a reliable, easy-to-use system without the fuss. Are you ready to prioritize depth over simplicity or vice versa?
Both Cloudbeds and Noovy aim to simplify hotel management, but their approaches differ. Cloudbeds’s all-in-one platform integrates reservation management, channel management, revenue tools, and more, making it suited for properties that need a holistic solution. Noovy, with its focus on automation and ease, simplifies core operations like bookings, payments, and guest communication, perfect for hotels prioritizing straightforward workflows.
Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set—covering 48 shared features plus 16 exclusive—offers flexibility but can sometimes overwhelm users during setup. Noovy’s lean design, with fewer features but high reliability, makes onboarding faster and easier, especially for smaller teams. Do you need a deep, customizable system or a simple, reliable one?
Edge: Cloudbeds.
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable platform with advanced revenue management, extensive integrations (190 verified partners), and features like inventory management and multi-lingual support, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its 1071 reviews and recent data (81 reviews in the last six months) reinforce its market dominance and ongoing customer satisfaction.
If your hotel is a boutique or independent property seeking affordability, speed, and ease of use—especially with a tight staff—Noovy is better. Its 19 reviews, all recent and rated at 5/5, highlight its simplicity, cost-effectiveness (€5 per room/month), and excellent support for smaller operations.
For properties that prioritize extensive customization and integrations, Cloudbeds’s vast ecosystem makes it the preferred choice. Conversely, if minimizing complexity and cost is your top goal, Noovy’s straightforward approach wins.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s user-friendly interface scores 4.61/5, with reviews praising its intuitive design and easy navigation. Onboarding is rated 4.45/5, but some users note initial setup can be complex, especially when linking external systems. Support is generally rated 4.41/5, with many praising its responsiveness.
Noovy’s interface is rated even higher at 4.84/5, with reviews consistently calling it “fast,” “reliable,” and “very easy to use.” Its onboarding score of 4.78/5 and excellent 4.89/5 customer support reflect a smooth, quick adoption process, especially suitable for small teams.
Edge: Noovy.
Cloudbeds offers a total of 64 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, automated assignments, and a guest app—capabilities that noovy does not provide. Its extensive 48 shared features cover core hotel functions, with 16 features unique to Cloudbeds.
Noovy, while comprehensive as an all-in-one system, does not boast the same breadth of features—focusing instead on core reservation, payment automation, and guest communication functions. If advanced features like EPoS, spa modules, or detailed analytics matter, Cloudbeds’s richer feature set is the clear advantage.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support is rated 4.41/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially during onboarding. Some users report occasional delays or the need for more comprehensive support during complex setups, but overall, it remains highly regarded.
Noovy’s customer support is rated 4.89/5, with reviews emphasizing friendliness, speed, and proactive assistance. Its 24/7 support model and simple onboarding process are especially appreciated by small hotel teams seeking quick solutions.
Edge: Noovy.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partner integrations, including major OTAs and tools like SiteMinder, Lightspeed, and Atomize. Its extensive ecosystem supports complex, multi-channel distribution and revenue strategies.
Noovy has 40 verified partners, with key integrations like Booking.com, Expedia, and social media channels. While fewer in number, these integrations are robust and highly valued by users who want reliable OTA connectivity at a lower cost.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating of 4.63/5 is backed by over 1,000 reviews, with recent reviews highlighting its reliability and depth. Larger properties, such as hotels and hostels, particularly rate it highly for operational efficiency and revenue features.
Noovy, with a perfect 5/5 rating from 19 recent reviews, is consistently praised for ease of use, support, and value. Its user base mainly comprises boutique and independent hotels, which prioritize simplicity over extensive features.
For overall market confidence and broader hotel segment ratings, Cloudbeds’s higher review count and recent data make it the stronger choice.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Both systems are priced at €600/month, with no additional implementation or hidden fees. Cloudbeds is a flat monthly fee without a free tier, while Noovy offers a similar pricing model but emphasizes affordability and transparency.
While Cloudbeds’s extensive features justify its price for larger properties, Noovy’s fixed, low-cost model is attractive for small hotels and independents seeking predictable expenses without sacrificing core functionalities.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds is the comprehensive choice for hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich PMS that covers every aspect of operations, distribution, and revenue. Its broad integration network and advanced capabilities make it suitable for hotels with growth ambitions and complex workflows.
Noovy excels in simplicity, affordability, and support, making it ideal for independent hotels or small chains that prefer an easy-to-adopt system without sacrificing essential functions. Its focus on automation and user experience ensures quick wins and satisfaction.
If your hotel aims for scale, automation, and extensive features, Cloudbeds is the clear leader. For those prioritizing straightforward management at a lower cost, Noovy fits perfectly.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Noovy 的为 71。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问