The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,300 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 OpenHotel 用户则强调 客户支持, 用户友好的pms, 持续更新和改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
用户友好的PMS
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
持续更新和改进
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
直接 OTA 连接
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
财务处理
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
团体预订工具
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #25 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #39 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #50 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | #21 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #37 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #45 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #28 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #43 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #14 54 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and OpenHotel PMS hinges on your hotel’s unique needs for integration, ease of use, and feature depth. Cloudbeds, with its extensive reviews and recent feedback, emerges as the more reliable choice for hotels seeking a comprehensive, scalable solution, while OpenHotel offers a streamlined but more limited alternative. Do you prioritize a broader ecosystem and proven support, or are you looking for a straightforward platform with core functionalities?
Both Cloudbeds and OpenHotel aim to simplify hotel management, but they diverge in scale and scope. Cloudbeds provides a unified platform combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, and more, supported by over 1,000 recent reviews, most of which are positive. OpenHotel offers a comprehensive suite as well but has a significantly smaller review count, with no recent reviews to confirm current satisfaction.
Cloudbeds’s recent user feedback emphasizes its modern interface, extensive integrations, and strong customer support, making it a dependable choice for hotels aiming to grow. Meanwhile, OpenHotel’s reviews highlight ease of use and personal support, but the lack of recent feedback makes it harder to gauge ongoing performance. Do you want a platform with a clear track record in recent hospitality innovations?
If your hotel needs a highly integrated, feature-rich PMS that supports large-scale operations and multiple properties, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Its over 1,000 reviews and a 4.63/5 overall rating, with recent user feedback, prove its effectiveness across segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts.
However, if your priority is basic property management with a focus on small-scale, personal service, OpenHotel’s intuitive system and strong customer support—supported by 57 reviews, mostly positive—might suffice. Yet, the lack of recent reviews suggests potential stability or scalability issues. For most hotels seeking growth, Cloudbeds offers stronger, more reliable support.
Cloudbeds scores a 4.61/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive design and mobile compatibility. The onboarding process is rated at 4.45/5, though some mention initial setup complexity. Its recent reviews highlight a straightforward experience for staff, even those less tech-savvy.
OpenHotel edges slightly ahead with a 4.71/5 rating, and users commend its simple navigation and helpful support team, especially for smaller properties. Nonetheless, the limited recent feedback leaves questions about long-term usability. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 41 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, online check-in, automated reminders, task management, guest CRM, and a spa & wellness module—features absent in OpenHotel. Its extensive marketplace and integrations, such as PCI compliance and GDPR, further enhance its capabilities.
OpenHotel offers core property management, yield control, OTA integrations, group management, and a booking engine. Yet, it lacks the depth and breadth of Cloudbeds’ feature set, which is critical for hotels aiming to scale or diversify services. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support scores a 4.41/5, with reviews citing quick, responsive assistance from a dedicated team, though some note inconsistencies during busy periods. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.45/5, and recent reviews mention prompt help with technical issues.
OpenHotel outperforms here, with a 4.82/5 support rating, and customers appreciate personalized, one-on-one assistance. Many reviews highlight the support team’s availability and helpfulness, which has been a consistent advantage. Edge: OpenHotel.
Cloudbeds offers a verified partner network of 190, including major players like SiteMinder, RateGain, and OpenKey, with nine shared integrations with OpenHotel. Its extensive marketplace supports a wide range of third-party apps, critical for complex operations.
OpenHotel supports only 12 verified partners, with shared integrations like Booking.com and Expedia. While suitable for smaller setups, the limited ecosystem reduces flexibility. For broader operational needs, Cloudbeds’s integration depth is a clear advantage. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews and a review count of over 1,000 give it a more representative score, with a 4.63/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments, particularly boutique hotels and hostels, praise its ease of use and operational impact.
OpenHotel’s 57 reviews, mostly older, show a 4.81/5 rating and a 95% recommendation rate, indicating satisfaction but with less recent validation. Given the volume and recency, Cloudbeds’s ratings carry more weight. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s base pricing starts at $600/month, with no free tier or trial info available. OpenHotel does not publicly list pricing, making direct comparison difficult, but reports suggest a competitive, possibly lower-cost structure for small properties.
The lack of transparent pricing for OpenHotel means you should contact sales directly. Cloudbeds’s fixed fee provides clarity, but for budget-conscious hotels, OpenHotel may offer a more affordable entry point—if it meets your feature needs.
Not ideal if you prefer minimal features or operate a very small property with basic needs. Also, if you require a simple, low-cost solution without extensive support, Cloudbeds’s complexity might be overkill.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced features like a large marketplace, extensive integrations, or sophisticated automation. Larger or fast-expanding properties may find OpenHotel’s limited scalability restrictive.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, flexible platform backed by a large, recent volume of positive reviews, making it the best choice for hotels seeking growth and automation. Its 41 unique features, extensive integrations, and recent support ratings position it as a trusted, scalable solution.
OpenHotel provides a solid, user-friendly core system with excellent customer support and a focus on small-to-medium properties. However, its limited recent reviews and narrower feature set suggest it is better suited for hotels with straightforward needs or those prioritizing personal service over extensive automation.
If your hotel aims to grow, optimize revenue, and streamline operations with a proven, well-supported platform, Cloudbeds is the clear leader. For smaller properties with basic management needs and a preference for personalized support, OpenHotel can be a viable, if more limited, option.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
OpenHotel
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
OpenHotel
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
OpenHotel
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在... 客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在旺季或系统转换期间。
许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由... 许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由于其灵活的预订网格和全面的布局,该系统对于中小型酒店尤其有效。
用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共... 用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共享,方便用户随时了解最新信息。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥... 虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥着不必要的信息,并建议进行改进以更好地满足他们的需求。
用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和... 用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和信用卡支付干预方面。
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OpenHotel PMS 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。OpenHotel PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。OpenHotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,OpenHotel 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问