The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 429 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
OpenHotel 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 429 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 58 | 371 |
在分析了 429 条经验证的评价后,OpenHotel 用户最看重其 客户支持, 用户友好的pms, 持续更新和改进,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
用户友好的PMS
▾
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
+
持续更新和改进
▾
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
+
直接 OTA 连接
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
财务处理
▾
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
−
团体预订工具
▾
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #25 36 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #39 11 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #50 0 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #21 2 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #37 16 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #45 4 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #28 9 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #43 2 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #14 54 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing between OpenHotel PMS by OpenHotel and Stayntouch by Stayntouch hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, size, and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline operations and boost revenue, but they approach these goals differently. OpenHotel offers a more traditional, all-in-one software ecosystem, while Stayntouch emphasizes cloud-based, mobile-friendly flexibility. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operational style and future ambitions?
While OpenHotel boasts a higher overall rating and more recent reviews, Stayntouch's extensive integration network and multi-property capabilities make it appealing for larger or expanding hotel groups. What's the most critical factor for your hotel?
OpenHotel and Stayntouch both address core hotel management challenges—reservation handling, channel distribution, and operational efficiency. OpenHotel’s strength lies in its integrated web solutions, including its booking engine, website builder, and yield management, all built into a single platform. Conversely, Stayntouch specializes in cloud-hosted, multi-property, and mobile-centric management, promising greater flexibility and remote access.
OpenHotel’s reviews highlight its ease of use, with an overall rating of 4.81/5 and 57 reviews, primarily from small to medium properties seeking a straightforward, all-in-one PMS. Stayntouch, with 317 reviews and a 4.56/5 score, appeals more to larger, multi-property portfolios or tech-savvy hotels prioritizing mobility and third-party integrations.
Both solve fundamental hotel management problems, but OpenHotel’s more mature presence in North America and Europe suggests a more localized, stable solution. Meanwhile, Stayntouch’s broader international reach indicates a focus on scalability.
Are you prioritizing a familiar, proven system or a flexible, cloud-first platform?
If your hotel needs a robust, all-in-one system that includes website management, direct OTA connectivity, and yield management, OpenHotel is the better choice. Its strength is in providing a comprehensive ecosystem tailored for small to medium-sized properties that want to control everything from reservations to marketing in one place.
For hotel groups with multiple properties, or those seeking extensive third-party integrations, remote management, and mobile tools, Stayntouch is ideal. Its focus on scalability, open APIs, and guest-centric features like contactless check-in make it better suited for larger hotels or chains looking to modernize their operations.
If your hotel is a boutique, inn, or small resort that values simplicity and integrated tools, OpenHotel fits well. Conversely, if you operate across multiple locations or want a system that adapts with your growth, Stayntouch offers the flexibility you need.
Which profile describes your hotel best?
OpenHotel’s ease of use is rated 4.71/5 based on 57 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface for small to medium properties. Many reviewers mention that staff pick it up quickly, especially for reservation and channel management tasks, but some find its older aesthetic and complex features somewhat cumbersome.
Stayntouch scores slightly higher at 4.7/5 from 317 reviews, with users emphasizing its user-friendly, mobile-optimized screens and simple onboarding process. Its cloud platform and remote training support quick adoption, especially for larger teams managing multiple properties.
Overall, both systems are highly rated for usability, but Stayntouch's modern, mobile-first design and extensive training support give it a slight edge in ease of use for diverse, multi-property operations.
Edge: Stayntouch
OpenHotel offers 21 shared features plus 2 exclusive ones—native email marketing and an EPoS system—focusing on core PMS functions. It excels in property management, channel management, booking engine, and website creation.
Stayntouch, with 28 features exclusive to its platform, provides extensive capabilities including mobile check-in, integrated ID scanners, task management, guest app, and automated space optimization. Its feature set emphasizes guest experience, operational automation, and multi-property management.
If your hotel relies heavily on integrated marketing and EPoS, OpenHotel may be more suitable. For extensive guest engagement tools and advanced automation, Stayntouch’s broader feature arsenal is advantageous.
Edge: Stayntouch
OpenHotel’s reviews highlight its strong support team, with a 4.82/5 rating and praise for personalized assistance—users appreciate the responsiveness, especially during emergencies. Review quotes mention the dedicated, friendly support staff that feels like part of your team.
Stayntouch’s support scores slightly lower at 4.68/5, with reviews praising onboarding and training but noting occasional delays in addressing complex issues. Users appreciate their quick training and remote support, though some mention room for faster issue resolution.
Overall, OpenHotel’s more recent reviews and higher support rating suggest a slight advantage in customer support.
Edge: OpenHotel
Stayntouch significantly outpaces OpenHotel with 188 verified integration partners, including popular platforms like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and Zaplox. Its open API approach facilitates extensive third-party connections, enabling seamless multi-system management.
OpenHotel offers 12 verified partners, including key channels like SiteMinder and Expedia, but lacks the extensive network of Stayntouch. Shared integrations include SHR Group and OpenKey, but the platform’s fewer partner options limit flexibility.
For hotels seeking extensive third-party integrations, especially with automation and contactless tech, Stayntouch is the clear leader.
Edge: Stayntouch
OpenHotel’s overall rating of 4.81/5 from 57 reviews indicates strong user satisfaction, primarily from small to mid-sized properties. Recent reviews emphasize its ease of reservation management and channel connectivity, with some complaints about outdated aesthetics.
Stayntouch’s 4.56/5 from 317 reviews shows high approval, especially among larger hotels and chains. Users praise its mobile interface, multi-property management, and integration capabilities, although some note operational speed issues.
Given the volume and recency of Stayntouch’s reviews, it has a slight edge in current hotelier ratings.
Edge: OpenHotel
OpenHotel does not publicly disclose pricing details, but it is generally positioned as a mid-range solution with flexible packages, often tailored to the property size. Many users cite its competitive, transparent pricing model with no per-booking fees.
Stayntouch charges a flat fee of $800 per month, with no mention of per-transaction costs or hidden fees. Its pricing suggests a value-oriented approach for larger or multi-property hotels expecting extensive use.
If budget transparency is crucial, OpenHotel’s less explicit pricing may be a downside. For predictable costs, Stayntouch’s flat fee simplifies budgeting.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive mobile guest services or advanced automation features, as OpenHotel’s mobile capabilities are limited compared to Stayntouch.
Not ideal if your hotel is rapidly expanding or heavily reliant on third-party integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with simple needs, or prefers on-premise software with localized control.
Not ideal if you need a more traditional, desktop-based PMS or have limited budget for monthly fees.
OpenHotel and Stayntouch both serve distinct hotel management needs, but their core difference lies in deployment and scalability. OpenHotel offers a comprehensive, all-in-one platform well-suited for small to medium properties that prefer a traditional system with a local presence. Stayntouch excels in cloud-based, multi-property management with extensive integrations, ideal for larger hotels or those planning rapid growth.
If your hotel values a familiar, integrated system with strong local support, OpenHotel is the recommended choice. However, if your hotel needs a flexible, scalable platform prioritizing mobility, third-party integrations, and future expansion, Stayntouch is the better fit.
For properties aiming for modern guest experiences and automation, Stayntouch’s platform offers more advanced features and a broader ecosystem. Conversely, budget-conscious hotels seeking a straightforward, proven solution may find OpenHotel more aligned with their needs.
In conclusion, your decision should reflect your hotel’s size, growth plans, operational complexity, and technological preferences. Both systems can support your success, but the better choice is the one that aligns most closely with your hotel’s unique context.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
OpenHotel
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,OpenHotel PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享 21 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
OpenHotel
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
OpenHotel
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在... 客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在旺季或系统转换期间。
许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由... 许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由于其灵活的预订网格和全面的布局,该系统对于中小型酒店尤其有效。
用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共... 用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共享,方便用户随时了解最新信息。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥... 虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥着不必要的信息,并建议进行改进以更好地满足他们的需求。
用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和... 用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和信用卡支付干预方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。OpenHotel PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。OpenHotel PMS 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。OpenHotel PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
OpenHotel PMS:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。OpenHotel 的 HT Score 为 16,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问