The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #27 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #15 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #15 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #21 42 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #21 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #17 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #20 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #29 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #10 79 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both Clock PMS and protel PMS aim to streamline daily tasks and unify hotel management but cater to different hotel profiles and needs. Your choice hinges on your property size, operational complexity, and the features most vital to your team. Which PMS will better serve your hotel’s specific requirements?
Clock PMS and protel PMS are designed to address core hotel management issues—reservations, billing, front desk operations, and guest communication. Clock’s strength lies in its all-in-one, cloud-based platform with a broad feature set and high user ratings, while protel offers extensive integrations, customization options, and adaptability, especially for complex or multi-property hotels. Do you need a straightforward, highly rated solution or a highly flexible platform tailored to diverse operations?
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, rapid onboarding, and a comprehensive set of features, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its 251 reviews, a 4.8/5 overall score, and recent user feedback confirm its high satisfaction level. Conversely, if your hotel needs a highly customizable, scalable system with extensive third-party integrations—especially for larger or multi-property management—protel’s 105 reviews and 4.11/5 score reflect a system suited for complex, evolving hotel brands.
Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, complexity, and integration needs: Clock is better for boutique, independent, or smaller hotels seeking simplicity, while protel suits larger chains or resorts demanding advanced customization and extensive integrations.
Clock PMS’s user interface is rated 4.78/5, with reviews highlighting its intuitive design that significantly reduces staff training time and simplifies daily operations. Many users praise its straightforward onboarding process and ease of navigating features, even during busy seasons.
Protel PMS, with a 4.12/5 ease of use rating, is considered more complex due to its extensive customization and integration capabilities, which can require more training and support. The interface is functional but less intuitive, especially for new users.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 16 features unique to its platform, such as EPoS, guest messaging, online check-in, and automated workflows, all included without extra charges. Its feature set covers reservations, rates, invoicing, and front desk essentials, plus integrations with channel managers and restaurant POS.
Protel’s 42 shared features include robust reporting, customizable interfaces, and multi-channel management, but it also boasts 4 exclusive features like guest CRM and SMS messaging. However, many users find some functionalities incomplete or buggy, especially in multi-property setups.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s support scores 4.75/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and proactive assistance. Users report that Clock’s customer service is responsive, with regular updates that improve functionality and user experience.
Protel’s support scores 3.95/5, with reviews indicating long wait times, inconsistent responses, and frustration over unresolved issues. Many customers feel support has declined post-acquisition by Planet, impacting their daily operations.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including key systems like Booking.com, RevControl, and FLEXIPASS, with no extra fees for connections. Its API documentation simplifies third-party integrations, making it easier to extend functionalities.
Protel PMS offers 195 verified integrations—more than Clock—covering property management, revenue management, and distribution systems. However, users report that onboarding new integrations can be slow and sometimes unreliable, impacting operational continuity.
Edge: protel PMS.
Clock PMS’s overall rating of 4.8/5 and NPS score of 9.47/10 reflect high satisfaction among diverse hotel segments, including boutique and city hotels. Recent reviews praise its ease of use and comprehensive features, especially among small to mid-sized independent hotels.
Protel’s 4.11/5 score and NPS of 7.7/10 indicate moderate satisfaction, with frustrations over support and bugs, particularly from larger or multi-property hotels. Its reviews show mixed feelings, with some praise for flexibility but notable criticism over reliability.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS costs $600 per month with no trial period or freemium options, focusing on transparent, flat-rate pricing without hidden fees. Its pricing structure aligns with its all-in-one approach, making it predictable for small to medium hotels.
Protel’s pricing starts at $500 per month, also without a free trial, but tends to be less transparent due to its extensive customization options and possible add-ons. Some users report additional costs for integrations and modules, especially for larger hotel groups.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Clock PMS excels as a straightforward, user-friendly system with high satisfaction ratings, making it ideal for small to medium-sized hotels or boutique properties. Its extensive feature set, ease of use, and recent reviews support its position as a top choice for hotels prioritizing guest engagement and operational efficiency.
Protel PMS offers a broader ecosystem with more integrations, customization, and flexible deployment options, fitting larger, complex hotel groups or resorts with demanding technical needs. Its robust architecture supports sophisticated workflows and multi-property management, although support issues and bugs can detract from its appeal.
If your hotel values simplicity, rapid deployment, and proven customer service, Clock is the clear winner. Conversely, if your operations require high customization, extensive integrations, and scalability, protel remains a strong contender.
Final recommendation: For hotels seeking a highly-rated, easy-to-implement PMS with recent positive reviews, Clock PMS is the better fit. If your hotel needs a flexible, integrated, and scalable system capable of managing complex operations across multiple properties, protel PMS remains a viable option, provided support and stability are addressed.
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 protel PMS (by Planet) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。protel PMS (by Planet):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,Planet 的为 33。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问