The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 484 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Planet 表现出色 在 功能和特点 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Guest profiles.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 484 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 110 | 374 |
在分析了 484 条经验证的评价后,Planet 用户最看重其 功能和特点, 易于使用, 多物业管理,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 smooth transition and training, user experience and interface, 客房服务和运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能和特点
▾
|
+
Smooth Transition and Training
▾
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
User Experience and Interface
▾
|
|
+
多物业管理
▾
|
+
客房服务和运营效率
▾
|
|
+
预订和价格管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持问题
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
定制和灵活性
▾
|
−
有限公司和发票管理
▾
|
|
−
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 32 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 50 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #15 10 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #17 3 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #21 42 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 34 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #17 33 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #20 9 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #29 6 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #10 79 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #15 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between protel PMS by Planet and Stayntouch can significantly influence your hotel's operations and guest experience. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. While protel offers extensive integrations and customization suited for complex properties, Stayntouch emphasizes ease of use and mobile functionality for efficient management. Your decision hinges on your property’s size, complexity, and your team's technical comfort.
Protel’s longstanding presence and broad integration ecosystem make it a versatile choice for diverse hotel types, whereas Stayntouch's recent rapid growth and high user satisfaction point to a more intuitive, user-friendly platform. But which truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Protel PMS provides a comprehensive, flexible platform that supports both on-premise and cloud setups, integrating over 1,200 hospitality systems. It’s designed for hotels seeking detailed customization and extensive backend tools, but its interface can seem complex, and recent reviews highlight slow support response times.
Stayntouch, on the other hand, is a cloud-native PMS lauded for its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface and seamless third-party integrations. Its ease of use translates into quicker onboarding, and recent reviews underscore a higher likelihood of recommendation and more current feedback.
The core difference is that protel excels in customization and broad integration, making it suitable for complex, multi-property operations. Stayntouch wins in simplicity and rapid deployment, ideal for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency with minimal training. Is your hotel better served by deep customization or straightforward usability?
If your hotel requires a highly customizable platform with extensive integration options, protel is the logical choice. Its large ecosystem of over 1,200 integrations and features like multi-currency, guest CRM, and native email marketing make it suitable for complex or multi-property operations.
Conversely, if your team values ease of use, quick onboarding, and mobile functionalities, Stayntouch should be your pick. It boasts a high review score (4.56/5), over 300 reviews, and a 94% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong recent user satisfaction and a focus on guest-centric features.
Hotels managing small to mid-sized portfolios or seeking rapid deployment will benefit most from Stayntouch. Larger, multi-property hotels needing extensive customization and integration are better suited to protel. Which features align more closely with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Stayntouch’s rated ease of use is 4.7/5, with over 317 reviews highlighting its intuitive, mobile-optimized design and straightforward onboarding. Users frequently commend its friendly interface, quick staff training, and real-time cloud access, making daily management less burdensome.
Protel scores slightly lower at 4.12/5, with some reviews citing a user interface that can be overly complex and integration delays. While familiar to many experienced hoteliers, it has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive customization options.
Edge: Stayntouch. Its modern, simple design and recent positive reviews make it the easier system for hotels seeking quick, hassle-free adoption.
Protel offers 37 shared features plus 9 unique to it, including multi-lingual support, guest CRM, gift vouchers, and native email marketing. Its features support complex operations like multi-currency management and full-stack payments, making it a robust solution for diverse hotel types.
Stayntouch has 37 shared features and 12 unique functionalities, such as integrated contactless check-in, online check-in/out, guest app, and housekeeping mobile app. Its focus on mobile and contactless features makes it ideal for guest experience innovation.
In terms of feature count, Stayntouch edges out slightly, especially in guest-facing tools. If your hotel values extensive contactless and mobile features, stay with Stayntouch. For deep customization and multi-lingual support, protel is preferable.
Edge: Stayntouch, given its broader suite of guest-centric, mobile features that enhance daily operations.
Stayntouch’s support and onboarding ratings (4.68/5) are significantly higher than protel’s (3.95/5). Recent reviews praise its friendly, responsive team, with comments like “their training team is excellent” and “support is always happy to assist,” reflecting ongoing commitment.
Protel’s support is described as slow and sometimes unresponsive, with reviews citing long wait times and frustration, especially post-Planet acquisition. Support responsiveness directly impacts daily operations, especially during critical system issues.
Edge: Stayntouch. Its recent reviews and higher ratings demonstrate a more reliable, hotel-focused support team.
Protel boasts 195 verified partners, including major systems like Right Revenue and Omnibees, with 76 shared integrations with Stayntouch. It’s known for its extensive ecosystem, supporting complex tech stacks.
Stayntouch has 188 verified partners, including RoomPriceGenie and STAAH, with some unique integrations. Its open API approach and unlimited interfaces appeal to hotels needing flexible connection to third-party systems.
While protel has a slight edge in total integrations, Stayntouch’s focus on open APIs and mobile integrations makes it more adaptable for rapid tech stack expansion. Which ecosystem aligns better with your current and future systems?
Edge: protel, due to its larger verified partner network and extensive integration options.
Stayntouch enjoys a 4.56/5 overall rating based on 317 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use and support. Hotels in various segments, especially independent properties and boutique hotels, frequently praise its intuitive interface and rapid onboarding.
Protel’s score is 4.11/5 from 105 reviews, with some users expressing satisfaction but also highlighting system bugs and support delays. Its reviews tend to be more mixed, reflecting ongoing issues with complex multi-property management.
Given the recent surge in Stayntouch’s review volume and higher rating, it’s the stronger choice for current user satisfaction. Hotels valuing modern usability tend to rate Stayntouch higher.
Edge: Stayntouch. Its higher, more recent review score and predominantly positive feedback favor it.
Protel’s base price is $500/month, with no trial or implementation fees mentioned. Its pricing reflects its extensive features and customization options, suited for larger or complex properties willing to invest.
Stayntouch’s base price is $800/month, also without trial or setup fees. Its higher cost aligns with its focus on ease of use, mobile capabilities, and rapid onboarding, making it attractive for hotels prioritizing quick deployment.
Pricing differences suggest that Stayntouch might be more accessible for smaller properties or those seeking faster ROI, while protel’s higher investment is justified by its depth and customization.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, needs quick deployment, or prefers a straightforward, mobile-focused platform.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on deep customization, complex integrations, or legacy systems that require extensive backend modifications.
Protel and Stayntouch target different hotel needs. Protel’s core strength is its extensive customization, integration ecosystem, and multi-property management suited for larger, complex operations. stayntouch’s focus is on ease of use, speed, and mobile functionality, making it ideal for hotels that prioritize guest experience and operational simplicity.
If your hotel requires advanced features, multi-lingual support, and a flexible infrastructure, protel provides a comprehensive platform. For properties looking for quick deployment, intuitive design, and mobile engagement, Stayntouch offers a compelling, modern alternative.
Choose protel if your operations demand extensive customization and integration; opt for Stayntouch if your focus is on simplicity, rapid onboarding, and guest-centric features. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,protel PMS (by Planet) 和 Stayntouch 共享 37 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Stayntouch receives high praise for its seamless transition and training processes, greatly aided by trainers like David and Julia, who are consistent... Stayntouch receives high praise for its seamless transition and training processes, greatly aided by trainers like David and Julia, who are consistently mentioned for their support and comprehensive guidance. Many reviews highlight the ease of moving from previous systems, an aspect noted particularly for its stress-reduction during onboarding.
The software is largely favored for its intuitive and user-friendly design, supporting efficient training and ease of user adoption, especially for st... The software is largely favored for its intuitive and user-friendly design, supporting efficient training and ease of user adoption, especially for staff with varying technical proficiencies. This contributes significantly to positive front-desk and operational performances.
Stayntouch的客房管理功能因其简化房间分配和跟踪客房服务状态而备受赞誉。这些功能通过提供实时更新来提升运营效率,从而优化日常工作流程。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然报告功能因其全面性和有助于运营监督而受到赞赏,但多项评论指出,报告的自定义程度和清晰度仍有提升空间。生成详细报告方面的困难也成为部分用户遇到的难题... 虽然报告功能因其全面性和有助于运营监督而受到赞赏,但多项评论指出,报告的自定义程度和清晰度仍有提升空间。生成详细报告方面的困难也成为部分用户遇到的难题。
一些评论指出,在管理团体预订和开票方面存在困难,并指出某些流程可以更加精简和直观。客户账户转移和历史数据访问方面的问题也表明,该功能仍有扩展空间。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。protel PMS (by Planet) 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 193 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
protel PMS (by Planet):否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Planet 的 HT Score 为 49,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案