The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 74 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 .
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and On premise.
基于 HTR 上 74 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 17 |
在分析了 74 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 HotelRunner 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #38 5 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | #44 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | #34 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | #41 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #36 8 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #38 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | #47 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #49 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #36 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #35 3 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | #25 0 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #4 6 条评价 |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and HotelRunner PMS hinges on your property’s specific needs and operational scope. Both platforms aim to streamline management tasks, but Counter primarily caters to hostels and small-scale accommodations with a focus on ease of use, while HotelRunner PMS offers a broader suite of features suitable for larger or more complex properties.
Counter is a free, lightweight solution praised for its simplicity and quick onboarding, making it ideal for hostels. HotelRunner PMS, with its comprehensive tools and integrations, supports hotels seeking to maximize revenue and automate routine tasks. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s growth plans?
Counter’s core strength lies in its straightforward, user-friendly interface tailored for small properties, especially hostels. Its focus on essential PMS features—guest check-in/out, reservations, POS, and automation—allows staff to operate efficiently without steep learning curves.
HotelRunner PMS offers a more extensive set of features, including revenue management, integrated CRS, gift vouchers, and advanced guest communication, catering to hotels with larger teams or multiple revenue streams. It provides a centralized platform for complex operations, making it suitable for properties aiming to scale.
While Counter boasts a high NPS score of 9.02/10 based on 54 reviews, recent feedback in the last six months is scarce, indicating limited ongoing user engagement. Conversely, HotelRunner, with 16 reviews and a near-perfect NPS of 9.88/10, demonstrates strong recent customer satisfaction. Will your choice depend on stability in user feedback or recent engagement?
If your hotel is a hostel or a small property prioritizing ease of use, minimal setup, and cost-effectiveness, Counter is the best fit. Its free model and mobile-friendly design allow your team to manage operations smoothly, especially with staff new to PMS systems or operating on a tight budget.
For larger hotels, boutique properties, or those with multiple revenue channels seeking advanced tools like revenue management, integrated CRS, and detailed reporting, HotelRunner PMS is the better option. Its paid pricing model ($100/month) reflects a more comprehensive feature set, advantageous for properties with complex needs.
In summary, choose Counter if your focus is simplicity, affordability, and quick onboarding. Opt for HotelRunner if you need a scalable, feature-rich platform that supports growth and complex operations.
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with users highlighting its intuitive, simple interface and quick staff onboarding. Reviewers appreciate its mobile-friendly design, allowing management from anywhere, and note that training staff is straightforward due to its clear layout.
HotelRunner slightly edges out with a 4.81/5 rating, praised for its user-friendly system that simplifies daily operations. Users commend ongoing training and support, which help staff adapt quickly to its richer feature set.
Both platforms are accessible for staff at all levels, but Counter's minimal interface makes it ideal for teams new to PMS systems.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Counter offers a core suite with 19 shared features, including reservations, invoicing, POS, and automatic payments—covering essential hostel management needs. However, it lacks some advanced features like revenue management, guest communication, or integrated ID scanners.
HotelRunner provides 10 unique features not in Counter, such as revenue management, integrated CRS, gift vouchers, native email marketing, digital registration, ID & passport scanner, SMS guest communication, and integrated payment terminals. These additions support more sophisticated, revenue-focused hotel operations.
Given its broader feature set, HotelRunner is better suited for properties needing advanced tools for sales, marketing, and guest management.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Counter’s customer support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviews emphasizing fast, responsive assistance. Staff like Evelyn and Max are frequently praised for their professionalism and helpfulness, though some users note support can be slower in certain time zones.
HotelRunner scores a perfect 5/5, with reviews highlighting ongoing training and dedicated support teams. Users report that support is prompt and effective, especially for onboarding and troubleshooting.
Both platforms excel, but HotelRunner’s consistently perfect ratings and emphasis on ongoing support give it a slight edge for hotels prioritizing dedicated, continuous assistance.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Counter’s reviews, totaling 54, show a high overall rating of 4.73/5, with many users praising its simplicity and support. Its main customer base—hostels—appreciates the straightforward management and quick setup, though some mention persistent bugs affecting bookings and bed availability.
HotelRunner, with 16 reviews, has a perfect 5/5 rating, especially among boutique and luxury hotels. Reviewers love its comprehensive features and support, noting it as a key tool for managing complex operations.
Given the recency and number of reviews, HotelRunner’s ratings are more current and slightly higher, making it the more trusted choice at present.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Counter does not list any pricing details, indicating it might be free or that costs are determined on a case-by-case basis. Its primary appeal is affordability, especially for small hostels with limited budgets.
HotelRunner charges a flat monthly fee of $100, with no additional implementation or setup fees. The paid model reflects its broader feature set, targeting properties that require advanced tools and integrations.
Your choice may depend on budget versus feature needs. Counter’s free model suits basic management, while HotelRunner’s paid plan offers more extensive capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced revenue management, detailed reporting, or complex guest communication tools.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with minimal operational complexity, or if budget constraints limit software investments.
Counter and HotelRunner serve different segments of the hospitality industry, with Counter excelling in simplicity and affordability for hostels and small properties. Its free, easy-to-use platform makes it a practical choice for budget-conscious operators seeking quick setup and straightforward management.
HotelRunner, with a more extensive feature set and a highly rated support system, is better suited for hotels aiming for growth, automation, and revenue optimization. Its rich integrations and tools make it a compelling choice for properties that want to scale efficiently.
If your hotel is a small hostel or budget operation with no need for complex features, Counter offers a solid, cost-effective solution. However, if you operate a boutique or larger hotel that demands detailed reporting, revenue management, and guest communication, HotelRunner is the superior platform.
In conclusion, for most hotels with aspirations of growth and automation, HotelRunner’s recent reviews, feature breadth, and support make it the preferable option. Counter remains an excellent lightweight choice for hostels and small-scale accommodations prioritizing simplicity.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 HotelRunner PMS 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 综合 CRS |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 HotelRunner PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelRunner PMS 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelRunner PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。HotelRunner PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,HotelRunner 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问