The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 566 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 ROI and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
HOTELTIME 表现出色 在 user interface and learning curve 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 566 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 17 | 549 |
在分析了 566 条经验证的评价后,HotelRunner 用户最看重其 ,而 HOTELTIME 用户则强调 user interface and learning curve, 技术支援, reporting and analytics。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
移动优化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #38 5 条评价 | #5 219 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #44 3 条评价 | #3 238 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #34 1 条评价 | #2 46 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #41 0 条评价 | #8 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #36 8 条评价 | #5 239 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #38 3 条评价 | #3 241 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #4 143 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #49 0 条评价 | #4 49 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #36 2 条评价 | #52 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #35 3 条评价 | #2 384 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #25 0 条评价 | #5 111 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #4 6 条评价 | #1 21 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. HotelRunner PMS and HotelTime PMS both aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision hinges on understanding which system aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
HotelRunner offers a smaller but highly rated platform with an emphasis on ease of use and exceptional support, while HotelTime provides a more feature-rich, scalable solution trusted by larger properties. Which system will serve your hotel’s current needs and future ambitions more effectively?
HotelRunner PMS and HotelTime PMS address core hotel management challenges—reservations, guest data, and operations automation—but they approach these from different angles. HotelRunner’s core strength lies in its simplicity and recent customer support ratings, boasting a 5/5 support score backed by 16 reviews, with no recent negative feedback. Its user-friendly interface consistently receives praise for making daily operations less burdensome.
HotelTime, on the other hand, is a broader, feature-heavy platform used by over 650 properties across 20+ countries. With a 4.83/5 overall rating from 433 reviews, it’s recognized for its extensive modules and global reach, especially among resorts and large hotels. But this complexity may require more time to master and implement effectively.
Do you need a quick-to-implement, straightforward solution, or a comprehensive platform capable of supporting a diverse property portfolio?
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, rapid onboarding, and dedicated support, HotelRunner is the better choice. It’s ideal for boutique properties, inns, and smaller hotels that want to streamline daily operations without extensive training or configuration. Its simple interface and ongoing support make it suitable for teams seeking dependable performance with minimal fuss.
HotelTime suits larger, more complex operations—resorts, chains, or properties with multiple outlets—that need a broad set of features like POS, spa & wellness modules, and advanced automation. Its scalability and integration capabilities support expansion and multi-department management. If your hotel needs a comprehensive, all-in-one platform, HotelTime delivers.
In summary, choose HotelRunner if your focus is on quick, intuitive management at a lower price point. Opt for HotelTime if your property demands extensive features and scalability.
HotelRunner scores slightly higher on ease of use, with a 4.81/5 rating based on 16 reviews, versus HotelTime’s 4.66/5 from 433 reviews. HotelRunner’s interface is described as very user-friendly, enabling staff to operate without extensive training, and its onboarding process earns a perfect 5/5. Customers mention ongoing training and support as key strengths, making adoption smoother.
HotelTime’s platform is also intuitive but can be more complex due to its wider feature set. Some users report initial challenges navigating modules, though once familiar, they find it enhances operational efficiency. Its onboarding rating (4.63/5) is strong but slightly behind HotelRunner’s.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner features 26 shared functionalities with HotelTime but offers only 3 features unique to its platform, such as mobile device notes, SMS guest communication, and on-premise options. HotelTime offers 25 exclusive features, including EPoS, guest profiles, spa & wellness modules, automated reminders, online check-in, and real-time reporting.
HotelTime’s extensive modules support complex operations like automated space optimization and PCI/GDPR compliance, making it ideal for larger properties. HotelRunner, with fewer features but a focus on core PMS functions, is suited for properties seeking straightforward management tools.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelRunner’s customer support is rated a perfect 5/5, with reviews highlighting ongoing training and responsiveness. Reviewers describe support as always helpful and friendly, with some noting that it’s a key factor for their satisfaction. The low review count (16) limits some insights, but recent feedback remains positive.
HotelTime’s support scores 4.73/5, with reviewers praising quick responses and knowledgeable assistance. Many mention the support team’s role in helping with complex module setups, although a few suggest extended availability could improve the experience.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations across POS, channel managers, and third-party systems, significantly more than HotelRunner’s 17 verified partners. Shared integrations include major players like IDeaS, RoomPriceGenie, and Expedia, but HotelTime offers exclusive integrations with Profitroom, RevControl, and Umi Digital, supporting larger, multi-channel operations.
HotelTime’s broader integration ecosystem makes it more adaptable for hotels with complex tech stacks or plans to expand. HotelRunner’s integrations are sufficient for smaller or mid-sized properties focusing on core management functions.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelRunner receives a perfect 5/5 rating from its 16 reviews, with particular praise for ease of use and support. Its recent reviews (none in last 6 months, but historically positive) suggest consistent satisfaction among boutique and small hotel owners.
HotelTime has a slightly lower overall rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews, but those reviews span a broad spectrum of property types, especially resorts and larger hotels, with many highlighting its robust features and support.
Given the volume and recency of HotelTime reviews, it holds the higher confidence rating—making it the more trusted choice overall.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelRunner’s base price is $100 per month, with no freemium, implementation fees, or hidden charges. Its transparent, low-cost model makes it accessible for small properties and boutique hotels.
HotelTime charges $600 per month, reflecting its extensive features and enterprise-level capabilities. Its pricing is better suited for larger hotels or chains with complex needs and a bigger budget.
In conclusion, HotelRunner offers a budget-friendly, straightforward solution, while HotelTime provides a high-value, comprehensive platform at a higher price point.
At its core, HotelRunner provides a simplified, highly rated system that excels in ease of use and support for small and boutique properties. Its lower price and straightforward interface make it a smart choice for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency without the complexity of extensive features.
HotelTime offers a broader suite of modules, integrations, and scalability for larger, more complex properties. Its extensive feature set supports growth, automation, and multi-department management, making it the preferred option for resorts and hotel groups.
If your hotel values simplicity, quick onboarding, and dedicated support, HotelRunner is the clear winner. For larger properties needing comprehensive management tools and extensive integrations, HotelTime delivers unmatched flexibility and scalability.
This comparison aims to guide your decision based on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth plans. Both systems are strong contenders, but the right choice hinges on matching their strengths to your specific needs.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,HotelRunner PMS 和 HotelTime PMS 共享 26 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 访客通信(短信) |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 16 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
虽然支持团队的响应速度和乐于助人的态度值得赞赏,但一些评论指出,延长技术支持时间将进一步提升用户体验,确保随时都能获得帮助,特别是对于国际用户而言。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HotelRunner PMS 和 HotelTime PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelRunner PMS 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelTime PMS 提供 58 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelRunner PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HotelRunner PMS:否。HotelTime PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HotelRunner 的 HT Score 为 0,HOTELTIME 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问