The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 73 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payments and Guest Messaging.
innOrder 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 App download.
基于 HTR 上 73 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 6 |
在分析了 73 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 innOrder 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | #9 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | #28 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #8 2 条评价 | #3 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
When choosing a hotel guest app, your goal is to enhance guest experience, streamline operations, and boost revenue. Both Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and innOrder aim to serve these needs, but they differ significantly in features, scale, and user feedback. Crave's robust, feature-rich solution is backed by a larger user base and recent reviews, giving it a clear edge. The question is: which platform aligns best with your hotel’s specific needs?
Crave Mobile Platform and innOrder address guest engagement and service automation but do so with differing approaches. Crave offers a comprehensive suite of features tailored for larger or more complex properties, with an emphasis on full integration and customization, while innOrder emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, especially for straightforward in-room ordering. Crave’s broader feature set and regional presence contrast with innOrder’s limited integrations and smaller footprint, raising the question of scalability versus simplicity.
Crave’s platform, with a 75.16/100 HTR Score, 48 reviews, and recent data, provides a more tested and trusted solution. innOrder, with only 6 reviews and a perfect 5/5 rating, offers a lightweight alternative, but with less proven track record. The choice hinges on whether you prioritize a mature, feature-rich platform or a simple, easy-to-implement solution. So, which meets your hotel’s operational complexity and scalability needs?
If your hotel needs a versatile, highly customizable guest engagement system with extensive integrations, go with Crave Mobile Platform. Its 20 unique features—including digital menus, contactless ordering, mobile checkout, and payment integrations—are suited for upscale, branded, or large hotels aiming to maximize revenue and operational control.
If simplicity, quick deployment, and basic in-room ordering are your priorities—especially if your hotel operates at a smaller scale or in regions where ease of use is critical—innOrder is the better pick. Its straightforward interface, emphasis on fast ordering, and competitive price point make it ideal for properties seeking efficiency without complexity.
Crave scores 4.61/5 on ease of use, with many reviews praising its user-friendly interface and onboarding process, though some mention that menu customization can be complex. Its setup is comprehensive but can require time for staff training, given its extensive feature set.
innOrder, with a 5/5 ease-of-use rating, receives praise for its simplicity and fast learning curve, especially appreciated in smaller hotels or regions with limited technical support. Its streamlined web app is praised for being intuitive and quick to navigate.
Edge: innOrder.
Crave’s platform boasts 20 unique features, including contactless ordering, Apple Pay, QR codes, POS integration, and upselling, none of which are available in innOrder. Crave’s extensive feature set is designed for full-service hotels with sophisticated guest service requirements.
innOrder offers only one unique feature—app download—focused on basic in-room ordering. Its limited features mean fewer options for upselling or personalized messaging, making it less suitable for properties seeking broad engagement tools.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s customer support scores 4.79/5, and reviews cite quick, helpful responses and proactive support, with hoteliers appreciating the 24/7 helpline. Several reviews mention the team resolving issues swiftly, enhancing trust in support during critical moments.
innOrder scores slightly higher at 4.83/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its responsive, professional after-sales support. Though fewer reviews exist, the feedback indicates a high level of customer satisfaction.
Edge: innOrder.
Crave excels here, with 17 verified integrations, including Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Google Pay. These integrations enable seamless synchronization with existing hotel management systems, which is crucial for larger or multi-system operations.
innOrder currently offers no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. This makes Crave’s platform more adaptable for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s overall rating of 4.75/5 and 93% likelihood to recommend are backed by 48 reviews, with many praising its reliability and feature set. Its recent reviews reinforce its reputation among larger or upscale hotels.
innOrder, despite a perfect 5/5 rating from 6 reviews, lacks recent feedback, making its high rating less reliable for decision-making. Its small review base also means less representative perception.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s pricing starts at a $400 base fee, with no freemium or monthly per-room charges, indicating a straightforward, albeit higher, entry point. innOrder charges $300 upfront, with no ongoing monthly fees or trial options, making it slightly cheaper initially.
Exact ongoing costs for both platforms depend on implementation and scale, but Crave’s higher base price reflects its more extensive feature set.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, low-cost solution or operate a small property with minimal F&B services.
Not ideal if you require extensive integrations, advanced features, or scalability beyond basic ordering.
Crave’s platform is a versatile, feature-rich system tailored for larger, upscale, or technologically advanced hotels. Its superior integration capabilities, extensive features, and proven support make it the preferred choice for properties looking to deepen guest engagement and increase revenue.
innOrder offers a simple, cost-effective alternative, especially suitable for small to mid-sized hotels that prioritize ease of use and fast deployment over extensive features. Its limited integrations and feature set mean it’s best for straightforward in-room ordering without complex needs.
Choose Crave if your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable platform with proven support, extensive integrations, and advanced features. Opt for innOrder if you want a basic, easy-to-use system that gets the job done quickly and affordably for smaller properties or regions with limited technical support.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 innOrder 共享 5 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 移动结帐 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 innOrder 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innOrder 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innOrder 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。innOrder:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,innOrder 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问